Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T06:20:57.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydrodynamic diffusion of a sphere sedimenting through a dilute suspension of neutrally buoyant spheres

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Robert H. Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0424, USA
N. A. Hill
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematical Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

Abstract

The motion of a heavy sphere sedimenting through a dilute background suspension of neutrally buoyant spheres is analysed for small Reynolds number and large Péclet number. For this particular problem, it is possible not only to calculate the mean velocity of the heavy particle, but also the variance of the velocity and the coefficient of hydrodynamic diffusivity. Pairwise, hydrodynamic interactions between the heavy sphere and the background sphere are considered exactly using volume integrals and a trajectory analysis. Explicit formulae are given for the two limiting cases when the radius of the heavy sphere is much greater and much less than that of the background spheres, and numerical results are given for moderate size ratios. The mean velocity is relatively insensitive to the ratio of the radius of the background spheres to that of the heavy sphere, unless this ratio is very large, whereas the hydrodynamic diffusivity increases rapidly as the radius ratio is increased. The predictions are in reasonable agreement with the results of falling-ball rheometry experiments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1992 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acrivos, A., Batchelor, G. K., Hinch, E. J. & Mauri, R. 1992 Longitudinal shear-induced diffusion of spheres in a dilute suspension. J. Fluid Mech. (submitted).Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1972 Sedimentation in a dilute dispersion of spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 52, 269272.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1982 Sedimentation in a dilute polydisperse system of interacting spheres. Part 1. General theory. J. Fluid Mech. 119, 379408.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. & Wen, C.-S. 1982 Sedimentation in a dilute polydisperse system of interacting spheres. Part 2. Numerical results. J. Fluid Mech. 124, 495528.Google Scholar
Brenner, H., Graham, A. L., Abbott, J. R. & Mondy, L. A. 1990 Theoretical basis for fallingball rheometry in suspensions of neutrally buoyant spheres. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 16, 579596.Google Scholar
Caflisch, R. E. & Luke, J. H. C. 1985 Variance in the sedimentation speed of a suspension. Phys. Fluids 28, 759760.Google Scholar
Davis, R. H. 1984 The rate of coagulation of a dilute polydisperse system of sedimenting spheres. J. Fluid Mech 145, 179199.Google Scholar
Davis, R. H. & Hassen, M. A. 1988 Spreading of the interface at the top of a slightly polydisperse sedimenting suspension. J. Fluid Mech. 196, pp. 107134. Corrigendum J. Fluid Mech. 202 (1989), 598–599.Google Scholar
Feuillebois, F. 1984 Sedimentation in a dispersion with vertical inhomogeneities. J. Fluid Mech. 139, 145171.Google Scholar
Fuentes, Y. O., Kim, S. & Jeffrey, D. J. 1988 Mobility functions for two unequal viscous drops in Stokes flow. I. Axisymmetric motions. Phys. Fluids 31, 24452455.Google Scholar
Fuentes, Y. O., Kim, S. & Jeffrey, D. J. 1989 Mobility functions for two unequal viscous drops in Stokes flow. II. Asymmetric motions. Phys. Fluids A 1, 6176.Google Scholar
Ham, J. M. & Homsy, G. M. 1988 Hindered settling and hydrodynamic dispersion in quiescent sedimenting suspensions. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 14, 533546.Google Scholar
Happel, J. & Brenner, H. 1973 Mechanics of Fluids and Transport Processes, 2nd revised edn. Martinus Nijhoff.
Hinch, E. J. 1977 An averaged-equation approach to particle interactions in a fluid suspension. J. Fluid Mech. 83, 695720.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, D. J. & Onishi, Y. 1984 Calculation of the resistance and mobility functions for two unequal rigid spheres in low-Reynolds-number flow. J. Fluid Mech. 139, 261290.Google Scholar
Kim, S. & Karrila, S. J. 1991 Microhydrodynamics: Principles and Selected Application. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Koch, D. L. & Brady, J. F. 1985 Dispersion in fixed beds. J. Fluid Mech. 154, 399427.Google Scholar
Koch, D. L. & Shaqfeh, E. S. G. 1991 Screening in sedimenting suspensions. J. Fluid Mech. 224, 275303.Google Scholar
Milliken, W. J., Mondy, L. A., Gottlieb, M., Graham, A. L. & Powell, R. L. 1989 The effect of the diameter of falling balls on the apparent viscosity of suspensions of spheres and rods. PhysicoChem. Hydrodyn. 11, 341355.Google Scholar
Mondy, L. A., Graham, A. L. & Jensen, J. L. 1986 Continuum approximations and particle interactions in concentrated suspensions. J. Rheol. 30, 10311051.Google Scholar
Mondy, L. A., Ingber, M. S. & Dingman, S. E. 1991 Boundary element method simulations of a ball falling through quiescent suspensions. J. Rheol. (submitted).Google Scholar
Shaqfeh, E. S. G. & Koch, D. L. 1988 The effect of hydrodynamic interactions on the orientation of axisymmetric particles flowing through a fixed bed of spheres or fibers. Phys. Fluids 31, 728743.Google Scholar
Shaqfeh, E. S. G. & Koch, D. L. 1990 Orientational dispersion of fibers in extensional flows. Phys. Fluids A 2, 10771093.Google Scholar