Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T08:50:48.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Korteweg-de Vries equation and water waves. Part 3. Oscillatory waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2006

Joseph L. Hammack  and
Harvey Segur
Joseph L. Hammack
Affiliation:
Coastal and Oceanographic Engineering Laboratory, Department of Engineering Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville Present address: Aeronautical Research Associates of Princeton, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey.
Harvey Segur
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Clarkson College of Technology, Potsdam, New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Water-wave experiments are presented showing the evolution of finite amplitude waves in relatively shallow water when no solitons are present. In each case, the initial wave is rectangular in shape and wholly below the still water level; the amplitude of the wave is varied. The asymptotic solution of the Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) equation in the absence of solitons (Ablowitz & Segur 1976) is compared with observed evolution. In addition, the asymptotic solution of the linearized KdV equation (a linear dispersive model) is compared with both the KdV solution and experiments. This comparison is a natural consequence of the fact that, in the absence of solitons, the asymptotic solutions of the KdV equation and its linearized version are qualitatively similar. Both the experiments and the model equations suggest that the asymptotic wave structure consists of a negative triangular wave, travelling with a speed (gh)½, followed by a train of modulated oscillatory waves which travel more slowly. Quantitative comparisons are made for the amplitude, shape and decay rate of the leading wave and the amplitude, dominant wavenumbers and velocities of the trailing wave groups. Over the parameter range of the experiments, asymptotic KdV theory predicts more closely the observed behaviour. The leading wave is observed to decay more rapidly than the trailing wave groups; hence the leading wave becomes less prominent with time. This is in agreement with the KdV solution, whereas just the opposite is predicted by linear theory. Linear predictions for the trailing wave groups are accurate only when they agree with the KdV predictions. Both models predict the evolution of short waves in the trailing wave region. When the short waves are unstable (k gt; 1·36), either group disintegration or focusing into envelope solitons is possible. Both of these phenomena are observed in the experiments; neither is predicted by long-wave models. The nonlinear Schrödinger equation is reviewed and tested as a model of these unstable wave groups. There is some evidence that the KdV equation and the nonlinear Schrödinger equation can be patched together to provide an asymptotic description of these unstable groups.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 84 , Issue 2 , 30 January 1978 , pp. 337 - 358
Copyright
© 1978 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ablowitz, M. J., Kaup, D. J., Newell, A. C. & Segur, H. 1974 The inverse scattering transform – Fourier analysis for nonlinear problems. Stud. Appl. Math. 53, 249–315.Google Scholar
Ablowitz, M. J. & Segur, H. 1977 Asymptotic solutions of the Korteweg–de Vries equation. Stud. Appl. Math. (to appear).Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1967 Instability of periodic wave trains in nonlinear dispersive systems. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 299, 59–75.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. & Feir, J. E. 1967 The disintegration of wave trains on deep water. J. Fluid Mech. 27, 417–430.Google Scholar
Feir, J. E. 1967 Discussion: some results from wave pulse experiments. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 299, 54–58.Google Scholar
Hammack, J. L. 1973 A note on tsunamis: their generation and propagation in an ocean of uniform depth. J. Fluid Mech. 60, 769–799.Google Scholar
Hammack, J. L. & Segur, H. 1974 The Korteweg–de Vries equations and water waves. Part 2. Comparison with experiments. J. Fluid Mech. 65, 289–314.Google Scholar
Hammack, J. L. & Segur, H. 1978 Modelling criteria for long water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 84, 359–373.Google Scholar
Hasimoto, H. & Ono, H. 1972 Nonlinear modulation of gravity waves. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 33, 805–811.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, H. & Jeffreys, B. S. 1972 Methods of Mathematical Physics, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, J.-J. & Kim, S. T. 1978 A viscous model for the propagation of nonlinear dispersive long waves. Submitted to J. Fluid Mech.Google Scholar
Schiff, L. I. 1968 Quantum Mechanics, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Segur, H. 1973 The Korteweg–de Vries equation and water waves. Part 1. Solution of the equation. J. Fluid Mech. 59, 721–736.Google Scholar
Whitham, G. B. 1967 Nonlinear dispersion of water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 27, 399–412.Google Scholar
Yuen, H. C. & Lake, B. M. 1975 Nonlinear deep-water waves: theory and experiment. Phys. Fluids 18, 956–960.Google Scholar
Zakharov, V. E. & Shabat, A. B. 1972 Exact theory of two-dimensional self focusing and one-dimensional self modulation of waves in nonlinear media. Sov. Phys., J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 34, 62–69.Google Scholar