Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T00:28:19.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the dynamics of starting plumes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2017

N. Bhamidipati
Affiliation:
BP Institute, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0EZ, UK
Andrew W. Woods
Affiliation:
BP Institute, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0EZ, UK

Abstract

We explore the dynamics of starting plumes by analysis of a series of new small-scale laboratory experiments combined with a theoretical model for mass, momentum, and buoyancy conservation. We find that the head of the plume ascends with a speed which is approximately 0.6 times the characteristic speed of the fluid in the following steady plume, in accord with Turner (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 13 (03), 1962, pp. 356–368), and so the fluid released from the source eventually catches the head of the flow. On reaching the top of the plume it recirculates and mixes in the plume head. We estimate that approximately $0.61\pm 0.04$ of the total buoyancy released from the source accumulates in the plume head, with the remainder in the following steady plume. Using measurements of the volume of the head, we estimate that a fraction $0.16\pm 0.08$ of the volume of the head is entrained directly from the ambient, with the remainder of the fluid in the head being supplied by the following steady plume. These results imply that the buoyancy force exerted on the plume head plus the momentum flux supplied by the following plume exceeds the rate of change of momentum of the plume head even including the added mass of the plume head. We propose that the difference is associated with a drag force resulting from the displacement of ambient fluid around the plume head. Using our experimental data, we estimate that the drag coefficient $C_{d}$ has a value $4.2\pm 1.4$, with the range in values associated with the uncertainty in our estimate of entrainment of fluid directly into the plume head. As a test, the proposed model is shown to provide a reasonable description of a starting plume rising through a stratified environment in the region below the maximum height of rise of the associated steady plume, although, above this point, the shape of the plume head changes and the model breaks down.

Type
Rapids
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Delichatsios, M. A. 1979 Time similarity analysis of unsteady buoyant plumes in neutral surroundings. J. Fluid Mech. 93 (02), 241250.Google Scholar
Middleton, J. H. 1975 The asymptotic behaviour of a starting plume. J. Fluid Mech. 72 (04), 753771.Google Scholar
Morton, B. R., Taylor, G. & Turner, J. S. 1956 Turbulent gravitational convection from maintained and instantaneous sources. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 234 (1196), 123.Google Scholar
Ohl, C. D., Tijink, A. & Prosperetti, A. 2003 The added mass of an expanding bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 482, 271290.Google Scholar
Rocco, S. & Woods, A. W. 2015 Dispersion in two-dimensional turbulent buoyant plumes. J. Fluid Mech. 774, R1.Google Scholar
Scase, M. M., Aspden, A. J. & Caulfield, C. P. 2009 The effect of sudden source buoyancy flux increases on turbulent plumes. J. Fluid Mech. 635, 137169.Google Scholar
Scase, M. M., Caulfield, C. P., Dalziel, S. B. & Hunt, J. C. R. 2006 Time-dependent plumes and jets with decreasing source strengths. J. Fluid Mech. 563, 443461.Google Scholar
Scorer, R. S. 1997 Dynamics of Meteorology and Climate. Wiley.Google Scholar
Turner, J. S. 1957 Buoyant vortex rings. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 239 (1216), 6175.Google Scholar
Turner, J. S. 1962 The starting plume in neutral surroundings. J. Fluid Mech. 13 (03), 356368.Google Scholar
Woods, A. W. 2010 Turbulent plumes in nature. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 391412.Google Scholar