Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T02:21:40.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Slow viscous flow due to motion of an annular disk; pressure-driven extrusion through an annular hole in a wall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

A. M. J. Davis
A. M. J. Davis
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, University of Alabama. Tuscaloosa, AL 3587–0350, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The description of the slow viscous flow due to the axisymmetric or asymmetric translation of an annular disk involves the solution of respectively one or two sets of triple integral equations involving Bessel functions. An efficient method is presented for transforming each set into a Fredholm integral equation of the second kind. Simple, regular kernels are obtained and the required physical constants are readily available. The method is also applied to the pressure-driven extrusion flow through an annular hole in a wall. The velocity profiles in the holes are found to be flatter than expected with correspondingly sharper variation near a rim. For the sideways motion of a disk, an exact solution is given with bounded velocities and both components of the rim pressure singularity minimized. The additional drag experienced by this disk when the fluid is bounded by walls parallel to the motion is then determined by solving a pair of integral equations, according to methods given in an earlier paper.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 231 , October 1991 , pp. 51 - 71
Copyright
© 1991 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Collins, W. D. 1963 A note on the axisymmetric Stokes flow of viscous fluid past a spherical cap. Mathematika 10, 72–79.Google Scholar
Cooke, J. C. 1963 Triple integral equations. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths 16, 193–203.Google Scholar
Dagan, Z., Weinbaum, S. & Pfeffer, R. 1982 An infinite series solution for the creeping motion through an orifice of finite length. J. Fluid Mech. 115, 505–523.Google Scholar
Davis, A. M. J. 1985 Axisymmetric Stokes flow past a spherical hollow boundary and concentric sphere. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths 38, 537–559.Google Scholar
Davis, A. M. J. 1990 Stokes drag on a disk sedimenting towards a plane or with other disks; additional effects of a side wall or free surface. Phys. Fluids A2, 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, A. M. J. 1991a Stokes drag on a narrow annular disk sedimenting in the presence of fixed boundaries or other disks. Phys. Fluids A 3, 249–257.Google Scholar
Davis, A. M. J. 1991b Shear flow disturbance due to a hole in the plane. Phys. Fluids A3, 478–480.Google Scholar
Dorrepaal, J. M. 1976 Asymmetric Stokes flow past a spherical cap. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 27, 739–747.Google Scholar
Dorrepaal, J. M., O'Neill, M. E. & Ranger, K. B. 1976 Axisymmetric Stokes flow past a spherical cap. J. Fluid Mech. 75, 273–286.Google Scholar
El-Gendi, S. E. 1969 Chebyshev solution of differential, integral and integro-differential equations. Computer J. 12, 282–287.Google Scholar
Ganatos, P., Pfeffer, R. & Weinbaum, S. 1980 A strong interaction theory for the creeping motion of a sphere between plane parallel boundaries. Part 2: Parallel motion. J. Fluid Mech. 99, 755–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goren, S. & O'Neill, M. E. 1980 Asymmetric creeping motion of an open torus. J. Fluid Mech. 101, 97–110.Google Scholar
Gradshteyn, I. S. & Ryzhik, I. M. 1980 Tables of Integrals, Series and Products (enlarged edition, ed. A. Jeffrey). Academic.
Happel, J. & Brenner, H. 1973 Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics. Noordhoff.
Hasimoto, H. 1958 On the flow of a viscous fluid past a thin screen at small Reynolds numbers. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 13, 633–639.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, H. 1981 Axisymmetric Stokes flow due to a Stokeslet near a hole in a plane wall. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 50, 4068–4070.Google Scholar
Karrila, S. J. & Kim, S. 1989 Integral equations of the second kind for Stokes flow: direct solution for physical variables and removal of inherent accuracy limitations. Chem. Engng Commun. 82, 123–161.Google Scholar
Lasso, I. A. & Weidman, P. D. 1986 Stokes drag on hollow cylinders and conglomerates. Phys. Fluids 29, 3921–3934.Google Scholar
Leppington, F. G. & Levine, H. 1972 Some axially symmetric potential problems. Proc. Edin. Math. Soc. 18, 55–76.Google Scholar
Liron, X. & Mochan, S. 1976 Stokes flow for a stokeslet between two parallel flat plates. J. Engng Maths 10, 287–303.Google Scholar
Majumdar, S. R. & O'Neill, M. E.1977 On axisymmetric Stokes flow past a torus. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 28, 541–550.Google Scholar
Miyazaki, T. & Hasimoto, H. 1984 The motion of a small sphere in fluid near a circular hole in a plane wall. J. Fluid Mech. 145, 201–221.Google Scholar
Payne, L. E. & Pell, W. H. 1960 On Stokes flow about a torus. Mathematika 7, 78–92.Google Scholar
Price, T. C. 1985 On axisymmetric Stokes flow past a finite circular pipe. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 36, 346–357.Google Scholar
Ranger, K. B. 1978 The circular disk straddling the interface of a two-phase flow. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 4, 263–277.Google Scholar
Roger, R. P. & Hussey, R. G. 1982 Stokes drag on a flat annular ring. Phys. Fluids 25, 915–922.Google Scholar
Sampson, R. A. 1891 On Stokes' current function. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 182, 449–518.Google Scholar
Sneddon, I. N. 1966 Mixed Boundary Value. Problems in Potential Theory. North Holland.
Spence, D. A. 1970 A Wiener—Hopf solution to the triple integral equations for the electrified disc in a coplanar gap. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 68, 529–545.Google Scholar
Stewartson, K. 1983 On mass flux through a torus in Stokes flow. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 34, 567–574.Google Scholar