Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T02:20:48.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Squeeze flows in liquid films bound by porous disks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2018

David C. Venerus Open the ORCID record for David C. Venerus [Opens in a new window]
David C. Venerus*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering and Center for the Molecular Study of Condensed Soft Matter, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: venerus@iit.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Squeeze flows in liquid films between a porous disk and an impermeable disk generated by the relative motion of the disks are analysed. Two configurations that differ by the arrangement of (im)permeable external surfaces that bound the porous disk (i.e. not in contact with the liquid film) are considered. Such configurations allow for bearings with tuneable load-bearing characteristics and are also encountered in joint lubrication, adhesion, printing and composite manufacturing. In the present study, flow in the porous disk is governed by Darcy’s law and flow in the liquid film is described using lubrication theory. The present analysis also allows for slip between the liquid film and porous disk. Analytical solutions of the coupled system of equations governing flow in the liquid film and the porous disk are found. Under certain conditions, somewhat unexpected flow patterns are observed in the porous disk. The load-bearing capacity for both configurations is also examined as a function of the permeability and geometry of the permeable disk.

JFM classification

Low-Reynolds-number flows: Low-Reynolds-number flows Low-Reynolds-number flows: Lubrication theory Low-Reynolds-number flows: Porous media
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 855 , 25 November 2018 , pp. 860 - 881
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2018 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ateshian, G. A. 2009 The role of interstitial fluid pressurization in articular cartilage lubrication. J. Biomech. 42, 1163–1176.Google Scholar
Beavers, G. S. & Joseph, D. D. 1967 Boundary conditions at a naturally permeable wall. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 197–207.Google Scholar
Chatraei, S. H., Macosko, C. W. & Winter, H. H. 1981 Lubricated squeezing flow: a new biaxial extensional rheometer. J. Rheol. 25, 433–443.Google Scholar
Coussot, P. 2014 Yield stress fluid flows: a review of experimental data. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 211, 31–49.Google Scholar
Elsharkawy, A. A. & Nassar, M. M. 1996 Hydrodynamic lubrication of squeeze-film porous bearings. Acta Mech. 118, 121–134.Google Scholar
Engmann, J., Servais, C. & Burbidge, A. S. 2005 Squeeze flow theory and applications to rheometry: a review. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 132, 1–27.Google Scholar
Guadarrama-Medina, T., Shiu, T.-Y. & Venerus, D. C. 2009 Direct comparison of equibiaxial elongational viscosity measurements from lubricated squeezing flow and MultiAxiales Dehnrheometer. Rheol. Acta 48, 11–17.Google Scholar
Hamrock, B. J., Schmid, S. R. & Jacobson, B. O. 2004 Fundamentals of Fluid Film Lubrication. Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Hamza, E. A. & Macdonald, D. A. 1981 A fluid film squeezed between two parallel plane surfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 109, 147–160.Google Scholar
Hou, J. S., Mow, V. C., Lai, W. M. & Holmes, M. H. 1992 An analysis of the squeeze-film lubrication mechanism for articular cartilage. J. Biomech. 25, 247–259.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. D. 1963 A study of squeezing flow. Appl. Sci. Res. 11, 148–152.Google Scholar
Karmakar, T. & Sekhar, G. P. R. 2018 Squeeze-film flow between a flat impermeable bearing and an anisotropic porous bed. Phys. Fluids 30, 043604.Google Scholar
Knox, D. J., Duffy, B. R., McKee, S. & Wilson, S. K. 2017 Squeeze-film flow between a curved impermeable bearing and a flat porous bed. Phys. Fluids 29, 023101.Google Scholar
Knox, D. J., Wilson, S. K., Duffy, B. R. & McKee, S. 2015 Porous squeeze-film flow. IMA J. Appl. Maths 80, 376–409.Google Scholar
Kompani, M. & Venerus, D. C. 2000 Equibiaxial extensional flow of polymer melts via lubricated squeezing flow. Part 1. Experimental analysis. Rheol. Acta 39, 444–451.Google Scholar
Kuzma, D. C. 1967 Fluid inertia effects in squeezed films. Appl. Sci. Res. 18, 15–20.Google Scholar
Lin, J.-R. 1996 Viscous shear effects on the squeeze-film behavior in porous circular disks. Intl J. Mech. Sci. 38, 373–384.Google Scholar
Lin, J.-R., Lu, R.-F. & Yang, C.-B. 2001 Derivation of porous squeeze-film Reynolds equations using the Brinkman model and its application. J. Phys. D 34, 3217–3223.Google Scholar
Meteen, G. H. 2002 Constant-force squeeze flow of soft solids. Rheol. Acta 41, 557–566.Google Scholar
Mick, R. M., Shiu, T.-Y. & Venerus, D. C. 2015 Equibiaxial elongational viscosity measurements of commercial polymer melts. Polym. Engng Sci. 55, 1012–1017.Google Scholar
Mick, R. M. & Venerus, D. C. 2017 A novel technique for conducting creep experiments in equibiaxial elongation. Rheol. Acta 56, 591–596.Google Scholar
Murti, P. R. K. 1974a Effect of velocity slip in an externally pressurized porous thrust bearing working with an incompressible fluid. J. Appl. Mech. 43, 404–408.Google Scholar
Murti, P. R. K. 1974b Squeeze-film behavior in porous circular disks. J. Lubr. Tech. 96, 206–209.Google Scholar
Nabhani, M., Khlifi, M. E. & Bou-Saïd, B. 2010 A general model for porous medium flow in squeezing film situations. Lubr. Sci. 22, 37–52.Google Scholar
Prakash, J. & Vij, S. K. 1974 Effect of velocity slip on porous-walled squeeze films. Wear 29, 363–372.Google Scholar
Reynolds, O. 1886 On the theory of lubrication and its application to Mr Beauchamp Tower’s experiments, including an experimental determination of the viscosity of olive oil. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 177, 157–234.Google Scholar
Sparrow, E. M., Beavers, G. S. & Huang, I. T. 1972 Effects of velocity slip on porous-walled squeeze flows. J. Lubr. Tech. 94, 260–264.Google Scholar
Stefan, J. 1874 Versuche über die scheinbare Adhäsion. Sitz. Kais. Akad. Wiss. Math. Nat. Wien 69, 713–735.Google Scholar
Venerus, D. C., Kompani, M. & Bernstein, B. 2000 Equibiaxial extensional flow of polymer melts via lubricated squeezing flow. Part 2. Flow modeling. Rheol. Acta 39, 574–582.Google Scholar
Venerus, D. C., Shiu, T.-Y., Kashyap, T. & Hosttetler, J. 2010 Continuous lubricated squeezing flow: a novel technique for equibiaxial elongational viscosity measurements on polymer melts. J. Rheol. 54, 1083–1095.Google Scholar
Verma, R. L. 1980 Effect of velocity slip in an externally pressurized porous circular thrust bearing. Wear 63, 239–244.Google Scholar
Whitaker, S. 1999 The Method of Volume Averaging. Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Wu, H. 1970 Squeeze-film behavior for porous annular disks. J. Lubr. Tech. 92, 593–596.Google Scholar
Yousefi, M., Bou-Saïd, B. & Tichy, J. 2015 Axisymmetric squeezing of a Phan-Thien and Tanner lubricant film under imposed constant load in the presence of a poroelastic medium. Lubr. Sci. 27, 505–522.Google Scholar