Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T23:20:07.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surfing the edge: using feedback control to find nonlinear solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2017

A. P. Willis*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield S3 7RH, UK
Y. Duguet
Affiliation:
LIMSI-CNRS, UPR 3251, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91403, Orsay, France
O. Omel’chenko
Affiliation:
Weierstrass Institute, Mohrenstrasse 39, 10117 Berlin, Germany
M. Wolfrum
Affiliation:
Weierstrass Institute, Mohrenstrasse 39, 10117 Berlin, Germany
*
Email address for correspondence: a.p.willis@sheffield.ac.uk

Abstract

Many transitional wall-bounded shear flows are characterised by the coexistence in state space of laminar and turbulent regimes. Probing the edge boundary between the two attractors has led in the last decade to the numerical discovery of new (unstable) solutions to the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. However, the iterative bisection method used to compute edge states can become prohibitively costly for large systems. Here we suggest a simple feedback control strategy to stabilise edge states, hence accelerating their numerical identification by several orders of magnitude. The method is illustrated for several configurations of cylindrical pipe flow. Travelling waves solutions are identified as edge states, and can be isolated rapidly in only one short numerical run. A new branch of solutions is also identified. When the edge state is a periodic orbit or chaotic state, the feedback control does not converge precisely to solutions of the uncontrolled system, but nevertheless brings the dynamics very close to the original edge manifold in a single run. We discuss the opportunities offered by the speed and simplicity of this new method to probe the structure of both state space and parameter space.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Åkervik, E., Brandt, L., Henningson, D. S., Hœpffner, J., Marxen, O. & Schlatter, P. 2006 Steady solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations by selective frequency damping. Phys. Fluids 18 (6), 068102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avila, M., Mellibovsky, F., Roland, N. & Hof, B. 2013 Streamwise-localized solutions at the onset of turbulence in pipe flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (22), 224502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chandler, G. J. & Kerswell, R. R. 2013 Invariant recurrent solutions embedded in a turbulent two-dimensional Kolmogorov flow. J. Fluid Mech. 722, 554595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chantry, M., Willis, A. P. & Kerswell, R. R. 2014 Genesis of streamwise-localized solutions from globally periodic traveling waves in pipe flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (16), 164501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cvitanović, P. 2013 Recurrent flows: the clockwork behind turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 726, 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duguet, Y., Pringle, C. C. & Kerswell, R. R. 2008a Relative periodic orbits in transitional pipe flow. Phys. Fluids 20 (11), 114102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duguet, Y., Willis, A. P. & Kerswell, R. R. 2008b Transition in pipe flow: the saddle structure on the boundary of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 613, 255274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckhardt, B., Schneider, T. M., Hof, B. & Westerweel, J. 2007 Turbulence transition in pipe flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39, 447468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farazmand, M. 2016 An adjoint-based approach for finding invariant solutions of Navier–Stokes equations. J. Fluid Mech. 795, 278312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. F., Halcrow, J. & Cvitanović, P. 2008 Visualizing the geometry of state space in plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 611, 107130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itano, T. & Toh, S. 2001 The dynamics of bursting process in wall turbulence. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 70, 703716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawahara, G., Uhlmann, M. & Van Veen, L. 2012 The significance of simple invariant solutions in turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 44, 203225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerswell, R. R. 2005 Recent progress in understanding the transition to turbulence in a pipe. Nonlinearity 18 (6), R17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerswell, R. R. & Tutty, O. R. 2007 Recurrence of travelling waves in transitional pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 584, 69102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khapko, T., Duguet, Y., Kreilos, T., Schlatter, P., Eckhardt, B. & Henningson, D. S. 2014 Complexity of localised coherent structures in a boundary-layer flow. Eur. Phys. J. E 37, 32.Google Scholar
Khapko, T., Kreilos, T., Schlatter, P., Duguet, Y., Eckhardt, B. & Henningson, D. S. 2016 Edge states as mediators of bypass transition in boundary-layer flows. J. Fluid Mech. 801, R2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiser, L. & Schumann, U. 1980 Treatment of incompressibility and boundary conditions in 3-d numerical spectral simulations of plane channel flows. In Proceedings of Third GAMMA Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Mechanics, pp. 165173. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreilos, T. & Eckhardt, B. 2012 Periodic orbits near onset of chaos in plane Couette flow. J. Nonlinear Sci. 22 (4), 047505.Google ScholarPubMed
Olvera, D. & Kerswell, R. R. 2017 Optimising energy growth as a tool for finding exact coherent structures. Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 083902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panaggio, M. J. & Abrams, D. M. 2015 Chimera states: coexistence of coherence and incoherence in networks of coupled oscillators. Nonlinearity 28 (3), R67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringle, C. C., Duguet, Y. & Kerswell, R. R. 2009 Highly symmetric travelling waves in pipe flow. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 367 (1888), 457472.Google ScholarPubMed
Pyragas, K. 1992 Continuous control of chaos by self-controlling feedback. Phys. Lett. A 170 (6), 421428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, P., Mellibovsky, F. & Avila, M. 2016 Emergence of spatio-temporal dynamics from exact coherent solutions in pipe flow. New J. Phys. 18 (8), 083031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, T. M., Eckhardt, B. & Yorke, J. A. 2007 Turbulence transition and the edge of chaos in pipe flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 034502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, T. M., Gibson, J. F., Lagha, M., De Lillo, F. & Eckhardt, B. 2008 Laminar-turbulent boundary in plane Couette flow. Phys. Rev. E 78 (3), 037301.Google ScholarPubMed
Sieber, J., Omel’chenko, E. & Wolfrum, M. 2014 Controlling unstable chaos: stabilizing chimera states by feedback. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (5), 054102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skufca, J. D., Yorke, J. A. & Eckhardt, B. 2006 Edge of chaos in a parallel shear flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 174101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. R., Deusebio, E., Caulfield, C. P. & Kerswell, R. R. 2016 A new method for isolating turbulent states in transitional stratified plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 808, R1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuckerman, L. S. & Barkley, D. 2000 Bifurcation analysis for timesteppers. In Numerical Methods for Bifurcation Problems and Large-scale Dynamical Systems, pp. 453466. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viswanath, D. 2007 Recurrent motions within plane Couette turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 580, 339358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vyazmina, E.2010 Bifurcations in a swirling flow. PhD thesis, École Polytechnique, France.Google Scholar
Willis, A. P. 2017 The Openpipeflow Navier–Stokes solver. SoftwareX 6, 124127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, A. P., Cvitanović, P. & Avila, M. 2013 Revealing the state space of turbulent pipe flow by symmetry reduction. J. Fluid Mech. 721, 514540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, A. P., Short, K. Y. & Cvitanović, P. 2016 Symmetry reduction in high dimensions, illustrated in a turbulent pipe. Phys. Rev. E 93 (2), 022204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfrum, M., Omel’chenko, O. E. & Sieber, J. 2015 Regular and irregular patterns of self-localized excitation in arrays of coupled phase oscillators. J. Nonlinear Sci. 25 (5), 053113.Google ScholarPubMed