Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T10:16:01.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taylor dispersion of orientable Brownian particles in unbounded homogeneous shear flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

I. Frankel  and
H. Brenner
I. Frankel
Affiliation:
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
H. Brenner
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The physical- and orientation-space transport of non-spherical, generally non-neutrally buoyant, Brownian particles in unbounded homogeneous shear flows is analysed with the goal of studying the respective effects of the orientational degrees of freedom of such particles upon their sedimentation and dispersion rates. In particular, the present contribution concentrates on the interaction between the Taylor dispersion mechanism (arising from coupling between the orientational dependence of the particle's translational velocity and the stochastic sampling of the orientation space via rotary Brownian diffusion) and the shear velocity field.

Making use of a recent extension of generalized Taylor dispersion theory to homogeneous (unbounded) shear flows, the mean transport process in physical space is modelled by a convection–diffusion problem characterized by a pair of constant phenomenological coefficients, provided that the eigenvalues of the (constant) undisturbed velocity gradient are purely imaginary. The latter phenomenological coefficients – namely, U*, the average ‘slip velocity’ vector (of the particles relative to the ambient fluid), and D*, the dispersivity dyadic or, equivalently, the pair of dyadics $\bar{\bm M}$ and DC (or $\bar{\bm D}^c$), the average mobility and the Taylor (or modified Taylor) dispersivity, respectively – are evaluated both asymptotically (in the respective limits of small and large rotary Peclét numbers) as well as numerically (for arbitrary Peclét numbers).

It is established that (up to a scalar multiplication factor, independent of Peclét number) the anisotropic portion of the average mobility is formally equivalent to the direct diffusive contribution to the particle stress in the context of suspension rheology.

The analysis focuses mainly on the case of simple shear flow. The approximate calculation in the limit of large Peclét numbers, Pe [Gt ] 1, which makes extensive use of the ‘natural coordinates’ along Jeffery orbits previously introduced by Leal & Hinch, verifies that, if the external force is non-orthogonal to the direction along which (undisturbed) fluid velocity variations occur, two of the eigenvalues of Dc are proportional to Pe; moreover, one of these O(Pe) eigenvalues is negative. When the external force is parallel to the latter direction, the negative eigenvalue corresponds to the principal direction of contraction in the shear velocity field; this thus relates the non-positive nature of DC to the interaction between the Taylor dispersion mechanism and the (deterministic) convection within the shear field.

Explicit results for the variation of the dyadics $\bar{\bm M}$, Dc and $\bar{\bm D}^{c}$ jointly with the respective magnitude of the shear rate and the deviation of the particle geometry from a spherical shape are presented for spheroidal particles. Among other things, it is demonstrated that the proposed definition of the modified Taylor dispersivity coefficient, $\bar{\bm D}^{c}$, does indeed yield a non-negative dyadic.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 255 , October 1993 , pp. 129 - 156
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K. 1956 On steady laminar flow with closed streamlines at large Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 177–190.Google Scholar
Bird, R. B., Armstrong, R. C. & Hassager, O. 1987 Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids. Vol. 1: Fluid Mechanics 2nd edn. Wiley.
Brenner, H. 1964a The Stokes resistance of an arbitrary particle – III Shear fields. Chem. Engng. Sci. 19, 631–651.Google Scholar
Brenner, H. 1964b The Stokes resistance of an arbitrary particle – IV Arbitrary fields of flow. Chem. Engng Sci. 19, 703–727.Google Scholar
Brenner, H. 1967 Coupling between the translational and rotational Brownian motions of rigid particles of arbitrary shape. Part II. General theory. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 23, 407–436.Google Scholar
Brenner, H. 1972 Suspension rheology. Prog. Heat Mass Transfer 5, 89–129.Google Scholar
Brenner, H. 1974 Rheology of a dilute suspension of axisymmetric Brownian particles. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 1, 195–341.Google Scholar
Brenner, H. 1979 Taylor dispersion in systems of sedimenting nonspherical Brownian particles I. Homogeneous, centrosymmetric, axisymmetric particles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 71, 189–208.Google Scholar
Brenner, H. 1980 A general theory of Taylor dispersion phenomena. PhysicoChem. Hydrodyn. 1, 91–123.Google Scholar
Brenner, H. 1982 A general theory of Taylor dispersion phenomena II. An extension. PhysicoChem. Hydrodyn. 3, 139–157.Google Scholar
Brenner, H. & Condiff, D. W. 1972 Transport mechanics in systems of orientable particles III. Arbitrary particles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 41, 228–274.Google Scholar
Brenner, H. & Condiff, D. W. 1974 Transport mechanics in systems of orientable particles IV. Convective transport. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 47, 199–264.Google Scholar
Burgers, J. M. 1938 In second report on viscosity and plasticity. Verhandelingen Koninkl. Ned. Akad. Wetenschap. 16 (§ 1, Chap. 3), 113–184Google Scholar
Cerda, C. M. & Ven, T. G. M. van de 1983 Translational diffusion of axisymmetric particles in shear flow. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 93, 54–62.Google Scholar
Dufty, J. W. 1984 Diffusion in shear flow. Phys. Rev. A 30, 1465–1476.Google Scholar
Elrick, D. E. 1962 Source functions for diffusion in uniform shear flow. Austral. J. Phys. 15, 283–288.Google Scholar
Foister, R. T. & Ven, T. G. M. van de 1980 Diffusion of Brownian particles in shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 96, 105–132.Google Scholar
Frankel, I. & Brenner, H. 1991 Generalized Taylor dispersion phenomena in unbounded homogeneous shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 230, 147–181.Google Scholar
Frankel, N. & Acrivos, A. 1968 Heat and mass transfer from small spheres and cylinders freely suspended in shear flow. Phys. Fluids 11, 1913–1918.Google Scholar
Giesekus, H. 1962 Elasto-viskose Flüssigkeiten, für die in stationären Schichtströmungen sämtliche Normalspannungskompenenten verscheiden grosse sind. Rheol. Acta 2, 50–62.Google Scholar
Hess, S. & Rainwater, J. C. 1984 Diffusion in laminar flow: Shear rate dependence of correlation functions and of effective transport coefficients. J. Chem. Phys. 80, 1295–1303.Google Scholar
Hinch, E. J. & Leal, L. G. 1972 The effect of Brownian motion on the rheological properties of a suspension of non-spherical particles. J. Fluid Mech. 52, 683–712.Google Scholar
Jeffery, G. B. 1922 The motion of ellipsoidal particles immersed in a viscous fluid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 102, 161–179.Google Scholar
Krushkal, E. M. & Gallily, I. 1984 On the orientation distribution function of nonspherical aerosol particles in a general shear flow I. The laminar case. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 99, 141–152.Google Scholar
Leal, L. G. & Hinch, E. J. 1971 The effect of weak Brownian rotations on particles in shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 46, 685–703.Google Scholar
Leighton, D. T. 1989 Diffusion from an initial point distribution in an unbounded simple shear flow. PhysicoChem. Hydrodyn. 11, 377–386.Google Scholar
Peterlin, A. 1938 Über die Viskosität von verdunnten Lösungen und Suspensionen in Abhangigheit von der Teilchenforme. Z. Phys. 111, 232–263.Google Scholar
San Miguel, M. & Sancho, J. M. 1979 Brownian motion in shear flow Physica A 99, 357–364.Google Scholar
Sarman, S., Evans, D. J. & Cummings, P. T. 1991 Comment on: Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics calculation of self-diffusion in a non-Newtonian fluid subject to a Couette strain field. J. Chem. Phys. 95, 8675–8676.Google Scholar
Scheraga, H. A. 1955 Non-Newtonian viscosity of solutions of ellipsoidal particles. J. Chem. Phys. 23, 1526–1532.Google Scholar
Scheraga, H. A., Edsall, J. T. & Gadd, J. O. 1951 Double refraction of flow: numerical evaluation of extinction angle and birefringence as a function of velocity gradient. J. Chem. Phys. 19, 1101–1108.Google Scholar
Stewart, W. E. & Sorensen, J. P. 1972 Hydrodynamic interaction effects in rigid dumbbell suspensions. II. Computations for steady shear flow. Trans. Soc. Rheol. 16, 1–13.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1953 Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 219, 186–203.Google Scholar