Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-23T00:38:58.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tearing of an aligned vortex by a current difference in two-layer quasi-geostrophic flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

J. S. Marshall  and
B. Parthasarathy
J. S. Marshall
Affiliation:
Department of Ocean Engineering, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA
B. Parthasarathy
Affiliation:
Department of Ocean Engineering, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A study of two-layer quasi-geostrophic vortex flow is performed to determine the effect of a current difference between the layers on a vortex initially extending through both layers. In particular, the conditions under which the vortex can resist being torn by the current difference are examined. The vortex evolution is determined using versions of the contour dynamics and discrete vortex methods which are modified for two-layer quasi-geostrophic flows. The vortex response is found to depend upon the way in which the current difference between the layers is maintained. In the first set of flows studied, the current difference is generated by a (stronger) third vortex in the upper layer located at a large distance from the (weaker) vortex under study. Flows of this type are important for understanding the interactions of vortices of different sizes in geophysical turbulence. A set of flows is also considered in which an ambient geostrophic current difference is produced by a non-uniform background potential vorticity field. In this case, an additional (secondary) flow field about the vortex patch in each layer is generated by redistribution of the ambient potential vorticity field.

It is found that a vortex that initially extends through both layers will undergo a periodic motion, in which the two parts of the initial vortex in the different layers (called the ‘upper’ and ‘lower’ vortices) oscillate about each other, provided that the current difference between the layers is less than a critical value. When the current difference exceeds this critical value, the upper and lower vortices separate permanently and the initial vortex is said to ‘tear’. The effects of various dimensionless parameters that characterize the flow are considered, including the ratio of core radius to internal Rossby radius, the ratio of layer depths and the ratio of the strengths of the upper and lower vortices. These parameters affect both the critical current difference for tearing and the deformation of the vortex cores by their interaction. It is found that for small values of inverse internal Rossby deformation radius, calculations with circular non-deformable vortices (convected at their centrepoints) give results in good agreement with the contour dynamics simulations, since the vortex deformation is small. The results of the study will be useful in determining the conditions under which large geophysical vortex structures, such as cyclones and ocean rings, can extend to large heights (depths) even though the mean winds (currents) in the ambient flow change significantly along the vortex length.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 255 , October 1993 , pp. 157 - 182
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aref, H. & Pomphrey, N. 1982 Integrable and chaotic motions of four vortices. I. The case of identical vortices. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 380, 359–387.Google Scholar
Eide, L. I. 1979 Evidence of a topographically trapped vortex on the Norwegian continental shelf. Deep-Sea Res. 26, 601–621.Google Scholar
Flierl, G. R. 1987 Isolated eddy models in geophysics. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 19, 493–530.Google Scholar
Flierl, G. R. 1988 On the instability of geostrophic vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 197, 349–388.Google Scholar
Gordon, A. L. 1978 Deep Antarctic convection west of Maud Rise. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 8, 600–612.Google Scholar
Griffiths, R. W. & Hopfinger, E. J. 1986 Experiments with baroclinic vortex pairs in a rotating fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 173, 501–518.Google Scholar
Griffiths, R. W. & Hopfinger, E. J. 1987 Coalescing of geostrophic vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 178, 73–97.Google Scholar
Gryanik, V. M. 1983 Dynamics of singular geostrophic vortices in a two-layer model of the atmosphere (or ocean). Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 19, 171–179.Google Scholar
Helfrich, K. R. & Send, U. 1988 Finite-amplitude evolution of two-layer geostrophic vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 197, 331–348.Google Scholar
Hogg, N. G. 1973 The preconditioning phase of MEDOC 1969 – II. Topographic effects. Deep-Sea Res. 20, 449–459.Google Scholar
Hogg, N. G. & Stommel, H. M. 1985 The heton, an elementary interaction between discrete baroclinic vortices, and its implications concerning eddy heat-flow. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 397, 1–20.Google Scholar
Killworth, P. D. 1979 On ‘chimney’ formations in the ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 9, 531–554.Google Scholar
Moore, D. W. & Saffman, P. G. 1971 Structure of a line vortex in an imposed strain. In Aircraft Wake Turbulence (ed. J. H. Olsen A. Goldburg & M. Rogers), pp. 339–353. Plenum.
Moore, D. W. & Saffman, P. G. 1975 The density of organized vortices in a turbulent mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 69, 465–473.Google Scholar
Orszag, S. A. & Gottlieb, D. 1980 In Approximation Methods for Navier–Stokes Problems. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 771, pp. 381–398. Springer.
Pedlosky, J. 1979 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. Springer.
Polvani, L. M. 1991 Two-layer geostrophic vortex dynamics. Part 2. Alignment and two-layer V-states. J. Fluid Mech. 225, 241–270.Google Scholar
Polvani, L. M., Zabusky, N. J. & Flierl, G. R. 1989 Two-layer geostrophic vortex dynamics. Part 1. Upper-layer V-states and merger. J. Fluid Mech. 205, 215–242.Google Scholar
Pullin, D. I. 1992 Contour dynamics methods. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 24, 89–115.Google Scholar
Reznik, G. M. 1992 Dynamics of singular vortices on a beta-plane. J. Fluid Mech. 240, 405–432.Google Scholar