Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T14:17:11.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The transition from roll to square-cell solutions in Rayleigh–Bénard convection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

D. R. Jenkins  and
M. R. E. Proctor
D. R. Jenkins
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, England
M. R. E. Proctor
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider three-dimensional finite-amplitude thermal convection in a fluid layer with boundaries of finite conductivity. Busse & Riahi (1980) and Proctor (1981) showed that the preferred planform of convection in such a system is a square-cell tesselation provided that the boundaries are much poorer conductors than the fluid, in contrast to the roll solutions which are obtained for perfectly conducting boundaries. We determine here the conductivity of the boundaries at which the preferred planform changes from roll to square-cell type. We show that, for low-Prandtl-number fluids (e.g. mercury), square-cell solutions are realized only when the boundaries are almost insulating; while, for high-Prandtl-number fluids (e.g. silicone oils), square-cell solutions are stable when the boundaries have conductivity comparable to that of the fluid.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 139 , February 1984 , pp. 461 - 471
Copyright
© 1984 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Busse, F. H. & Riahi, N. 1980 Nonlinear convection in a layer with nearly insulating boundaries J. Fluid Mech. 96, 243–256.Google Scholar
Chapman, C. J. & Proctor, M. R. E. 1980 Nonlinear Rayleigh—Bénard convection between poorly conducting boundaries J. Fluid Mech. 101, 759–782.Google Scholar
Hurle, D. T. J., Jakeman, E. & Pike, E. R. 1967 On the solution of the Bénard problem with boundaries of finite conductivity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond A 296, 469–475.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, H. 1926 The stability of a layer heated from below Phil. Mag. 2, 833–844.Google Scholar
Malkus, W. V. R. & Veronis, G. 1958 Finite amplitude cellular convection J. Fluid Mech. 4, 225–260.Google Scholar
Proctor, M. R. E. 1981 Planform selection by finite-amplitude thermal convection between poorly conducting slabs J. Fluid Mech. 113, 469–485.Google Scholar
Riahi, N. 1983 Nonlinear convection in a porous layer with finite conductivity boundaries J. Fluid Mech. 129, 153–171.Google Scholar
Schluter, A., Lortz, D. & Busse, F. 1965 On the stability of steady finite amplitude convection J. Fluid Mech. 23, 129–144.Google Scholar
Sparrow, E. M., Goldstein, R. J. & Jonsson, V. H. 1964 Thermal instability in a horizontal fluid layer: effect of boundary conditions and nonlinear temperature profile. J. Fluid Mech. 18, 513–513.Google Scholar
Whitehead, J. A. & Chan, G. L. 1976 Stability of Rayleigh—Bénard convection rolls and bimodal flow at moderate Prandtl number Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 1, 33–49.Google Scholar