Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T20:13:28.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wave-activity conservation laws and stability theorems for semi-geostrophic dynamics. Part 1. Pseudomomentum-based theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Paul J. Kushner
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S 1A7
Theodore G. Shepherd
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S 1A7

Abstract

There exists a well-developed body of theory based on quasi-geostrophic (QG) dynamics that is central to our present understanding of large-scale atmospheric and oceanic dynamics. An important question is the extent to which this body of theory may generalize to more accurate dynamical models. As a first step in this process, we here generalize a set of theoretical results, concerning the evolution of disturbances to prescribed basic states, to semi-geostrophic (SG) dynamics. SG dynamics, like QG dynamics, is a Hamiltonian balanced model whose evolution is described by the material conservation of potential vorticity, together with an invertibility principle relating the potential vorticity to the advecting fields. SG dynamics has features that make it a good prototype for balanced models that are more accurate than QG dynamics.

In the first part of this two-part study, we derive a pseudomomentum invariant for the SG equations, and use it to obtain: (i) linear and nonlinear generalized Charney–Stern theorems for disturbances to parallel flows; (ii) a finite-amplitude local conservation law for the invariant, obeying the group-velocity property in the WKB limit; and (iii) a wave-mean-flow interaction theorem consisting of generalized Eliassen–Palm flux diagnostics, an elliptic equation for the stream-function tendency, and a non-acceleration theorem. All these results are analogous to their QG forms.

The pseudomomentum invariant – a conserved second-order disturbance quantity that is associated with zonal symmetry – is constructed using a variational principle in a similar manner to the QG calculations. Such an approach is possible when the equations of motion under the geostrophic momentum approximation are transformed to isentropic and geostrophic coordinates, in which the ageostrophic advection terms are no longer explicit. Symmetry-related wave-activity invariants such as the pseudomomentum then arise naturally from the Hamiltonian structure of the SG equations. We avoid use of the so-called ‘massless layer’ approach to the modelling of isentropic gradients at the lower boundary, preferring instead to incorporate explicitly those boundary contributions into the wave-activity and stability results. This makes the analogy with QG dynamics most transparent.

This paper treats the f-plane Boussinesq form of SG dynamics, and its recent extension to β-plane, compressible flow by Magnusdottir & Schubert. In the limit of small Rossby number, the results reduce to their respective QG forms. Novel features particular to SG dynamics include apparently unnoticed lateral boundary stability criteria in (i), and the necessity of including additional zonal-mean eddy correlation terms besides the zonal-mean potential vorticity fluxes in the wave-mean-flow balance in (iii).

In the companion paper, wave-activity conservation laws and stability theorems based on the SG form of the pseudoenergy are presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1995 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, D. G. 1983 A finite-amplitude Eliassen-Palm theorem in isentropic coordinates. J. Atmos. Sci. 40, 18771883.Google Scholar
Andrews, D. G., Holton, J. R. & Leovy, C. B. 1987 Middle Atmosphere Dynamics. Academic Press.
Andrews, D. G. & Mcintyre, M. E. 1976 Planetary waves in horizontal and vertical shear: the generalized Eliassen-Palm relation and the mean zonal acceleration. J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 20312048.Google Scholar
Andrews, D. G. & Mcintyre, M. E. 1978 Generalized Eliassen-Palm and Charney-Drazin theorems for waves on axisymmetric mean flows in compressible atmospheres. J. Atmos. Sci. 35, 175185.Google Scholar
Arnol'D, V. I. 1966 On an a priori estimate in the theory of hydrodynamical stability. Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Matematika, 54 ((5), 35. (English transl. Am. Math. Soc. Transl., Series 2, 79, 267-269 (1969).)Google Scholar
Barth, J. A., Allen, J. S. & Newberger, P. A. 1990 On intermediate models for barotropic continental shelf and slope flow fields: Part II, comparison of numerical model solutions in doubly-periodic domains. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 20, 10441076.Google Scholar
Bretherton, F. P. 1966 Critical layer instability in baroclinic flows. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 92, 325334.Google Scholar
Bretherton, F. P. & Garrett, C. J. R. 1968 Wavetrains in inhomogeneous moving media. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., A 302, 529554.Google Scholar
Chynoweth, S. & Sewell, M. J. 1989 Dual variables in semigeostrophic theory. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., A 424, 155186.Google Scholar
Craig, G. C. 1993 A scaling for the three-dimensional semigeostrophic approximation. J. Atmos. Sci. 50, 33503355.Google Scholar
Dunkerton, T. J., Hsu, C.-P. F. & Mcintyre, M. E. 1981 Some Eulerian and Lagrangian diagnostics for a model stratospheric warming. J. Atmos. Sci. 38, 819843.Google Scholar
Edmon, H. J., Hoskins, B. J. & Mcintyre, M. E. 1980 Eliassen-Palm cross sections for the troposphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 26002616.Google Scholar
Eliiassen, A. 1948 The quasi-static equations of motion. Geofys. Publ. 17, No. 3.
Eliassen, A. 1983 The Charney-Stern theorem on barotropic-baroclinic instability. Pure Appl. Geophys. 121, 563572.Google Scholar
Held, I. M. & Hoskins, B. J. 1985 Large-scale eddies and the general circulation of the atmosphere. Adv. Geophys., 28A, 331.Google Scholar
Holm, D. D., Marsden, J. E., Ratiu, T. & Weinstein, A. 1985 Nonlinear stability of fluid and plasma equilibria. Phys. Rep. 123, 1116.Google Scholar
Hoskins, B. J. 1975 The geostrophic momentum approximation and the semi-geostrophic equations. J. Atmos. Sci. 32, 233242.Google Scholar
Hoskins, B. J. 1983 Modelling of the transient eddies and their feedback on the mean flow. In Large-Scale Dynamical Processes in the Atmosphere (ed. B. J. Hoskins & R. P. Pearce), pp. 169199. Academic Press.
Hoskins, B. J. & Bretherton, F. P. 1972 Atmospheric frontogenesis models: mathematical formulation and solution. J. Atmos. Sci. 29, 1137.Google Scholar
Hoskins, B. J., Mcintyre, M. E. & Robertson, A. W. 1985 On the use and significance of isentropic potential-vorticity maps. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 111, 877946.Google Scholar
Kushner, P. J. 1993 Nonlinear stability and wave, mean-flow interaction in semi-geostrophic theory. In Ninth Conf. on Atmospheric and Oceanic Waves and Stability. Preprint volume, pp. 363366. American Meteorological Society.
Kushner, P. J. 1995 A generalized Charney-Stern theorem for semi-geostrophic dynamics. Tellus (In press).
Kushner, P. J. & Shepherd, T. G. 1995 Wave-activity conservation laws and stability theorems for semi-geostrophic dynamics. Part 2. Pseudoenergy-based theory. J. Fluid Mech. 290, 105129.Google Scholar
Lorenz, E. N. 1955 Available potential energy and the maintenance of the general circulation. Tellus 7, 157167.Google Scholar
Lu, C. D. 1993 Balanced dynamics for three dimensional curved flows. PhD dissertation, Colorado State University.
Magnusdottir, G. & Schubert, W. H. 1990 The generalization of semi-geostrophic theory to the β-plane. J. Atmos. Sci. 47, 17141720 (referred to herein as MSc90).Google Scholar
Magnusdottir, G. & Schubert, W. H. 1991 Semigeostrophic theory on the hemisphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 48, 14491456.Google Scholar
Mcintyre, M. E. & Shepherd, T. G. 1987 An exact local conservation theorem for finite-amplitude disturbances to non-parallel shear flows, with remarks on Hamiltonian structure and on Arnol'd's stability theorems. J. Fluid Mech. 181, 527565.Google Scholar
Mcwilliams, J. C. & Gent, P. R. 1980 Intermediate models of planetary circulations in the atmosphere and ocean. J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 16571678.Google Scholar
Purser, R. J. & Cullen, M. J. P. 1987 A duality principle in semi-geostrophic theory. J. Atmos. Sci. 44, 34493468.Google Scholar
Randel, W. J. & Held, I. M. 1991 Phase speed spectra of transient eddy fluxes and critical layer absorption. J Atmos. Sci. 48, 688697.Google Scholar
Roulstone, I. & Norbury, J. 1994 A Hamiltonian structure with contact geometry for the semi-geostrophic equations. J. Fluid Mech. 272, 211233.Google Scholar
Salmon, R. 1985 New equations for nearly geostrophic flow. J. Fluid Mech. 153, 461477.Google Scholar
Salmon, R. 1988a Semigeostrophic theory as a Dirac-bracket projection.. J. Fluid Mech. 196, 345358.Google Scholar
Salmon, R. 1988b Hamiltonian fluid mechanics.. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 225256.Google Scholar
Sewell, M. J. & Roulstone, I. 1993 Anatomy of the canonical transformation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Land., A 345, 577598.Google Scholar
Shepherd, T. G. 1988 Nonlinear saturation of baroclinic instability. Part I: The two-layer model. J. Atmos. Sci. 45, 20142025.Google Scholar
Shepherd, T. G. 1989 Nonlinear saturation of baroclinic instability. Part II: Continuously stratified fluid. J. Atmos. Sci. 46, 888907 (referred to herein as S89).Google Scholar
Shepherd, T. G. 1990 Symmetries, conservation laws, and Hamiltonian structure in geophysical fluid dynamics. Adv. Geophys. 32, 287338.Google Scholar
Shepherd, T. G. 1993 Nonlinear saturation of baroclinic instability. Part III: Bounds on the energy. J. Atmos. Sci. 50, 26972709.Google Scholar
Snyder, C., Skamarock, W. & Rotunno, R. 1991 A comparison of primitive-equation and semigeostrophic simulations of baroclinic waves. J. Atmos. Sci. 48, 21792194.Google Scholar
White, A. A. 1977 Modified quasi-geostrophic equations using geometric height as vertical coordinate. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 103, 383396.Google Scholar
Whitham, G. B. 1965 A general approach to linear and nonlinear dispersive waves using a Lagrangian. J. Fluid Mech. 22, 273283.Google Scholar