Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T17:44:15.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An analytic solution for the noise generated by gust–aerofoil interaction for plates with serrated leading edges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2018

Lorna J. Ayton*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
Jae Wook Kim
Affiliation:
Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics Research Group, University Road, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
*
Email address for correspondence: L.J.Ayton@damtp.cam.ac.uk

Abstract

This paper presents an analytic solution for the sound generated by an unsteady gust interacting with a semi-infinite flat plate with a serrated leading edge in a background steady uniform flow. Viscous and nonlinear effects are neglected. The Wiener–Hopf method is used in conjunction with a non-orthogonal coordinate transformation and separation of variables to permit analytical progress. The solution is obtained in terms of a modal expansion in the spanwise coordinate; however, for low- and mid-range incident frequencies only the zeroth-order mode is seen to contribute to the far-field acoustics, therefore the far-field noise can be quickly evaluated. The solution gives insight into the potential mechanisms behind the reduction of noise for plates with serrated leading edges compared to those with straight edges, and predicts a logarithmic dependence between the tip-to-root serration height and the decrease of far-field noise. The two mechanisms behind the noise reduction are proposed to be an increased destructive interference in the far field, and a redistribution of acoustic energy from low cut-on modes to higher cut-off modes as the tip-to-root serration height is increased. The analytic results show good agreement in comparison with experimental measurements. The results are also compared against nonlinear numerical predictions where good agreement is also seen between the two results as frequency and tip-to-root ratio are varied.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© 2018 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamczyk, J. J. 1974 Passage of a swept airfoil through an oblique gust. J. Sound Aircraft 11, 281287.Google Scholar
Amiet, R. K. 1975 Acoustic radiation from an airfoil in a turbulent stream. J. Sound Vib. 41, 407420.Google Scholar
Ayton, L. J. & Chaitanya, P. 2017 Analytical and experimental investigation into the effects of leading-edge radius on gust–aerofoil interaction noise. J. Fluid Mech. 829, 780808 Google Scholar
Chaitanya, P., Narayanan, S., Joseph, P. F. & Kim, J. W.2016 Leading edge serration geometries for significantly enhanced leading edge noise reductions. In 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. AIAA Paper 2016-2736.Google Scholar
Envia, E.1988 Influence of vane sweep on rotor–stator interaction noise. PhD thesis, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Geyer, T. F., Wasala, S. H., Cater, J. E., Norris, S. E. & Sarradj, E.2016 Experimental investigation of leading edge hook structures for wind turbine noise reduction. In 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. AIAA Paper 2016-2954.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M. E. & Atassi, H. 1976 A complete second-order theory for the unsteady flow about an airfoil due to a periodic gust. J. Fluid Mech. 74, 741765.Google Scholar
Graham, R. R. 1934 The silent flight of owls. J. R. Aero. Soc. 38, 837843.Google Scholar
Haeri, S., Kim, J. W. & Joseph, P.2015 On the mechanisms of noise reduction in aerofoil–turbulence interaction by using wavy leading edges. In 21st AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. AIAA Paper 2015-3269.Google Scholar
Huang, X. 2017 Theoretical model of acoustic scattering from a flat plate with serrations. J. Fluid Mech. 819, 228257.Google Scholar
Kim, J. W. 2013 Quasi-disjoint pentadiagonal matrix systems for the parallelization of compact finite-difference schemes and filters. J. Comput. Phys. 241, 168194.Google Scholar
Kim, J. W., Haeri, S. & Joseph, P. F. 2016 On the reduction of aerofoil–turbulence interaction noise associated with wavy leading edges. J. Fluid Mech. 792, 526552.Google Scholar
Kim, J. W., Lau, A. S. H. & Sandham, N. D. 2010a Boundary conditions for airfoil noise due to high-frequency gusts. Periodica Engineering 6, 244253.Google Scholar
Kim, J. W., Lau, A. S. H. & Sandham, N. D. 2010b Proposed boundary conditions for gust–airfoil interaction noise. AIAA J. 48, 27052709.Google Scholar
Kim, J. W. & Morris, P. J. 2002 Computation of subsonic inviscid flow past a cone using high-order schemes. AIAA J. 40, 19611968.Google Scholar
Lilley, G. M.1998 A study of the silent flight of the owl. In 4th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. AIAA Paper 1998-2340.Google Scholar
Lockard, D. P. & Morris, P. J. 1998 Radiated noise from airfoils in realistic mean flows. AIAA J. 36, 907914.Google Scholar
Lyu, B. & Azarpeyvand, M. 2017 On the noise prediction for serrated leading edges. J. Fluid Mech. 826, 205234.Google Scholar
Mathews, J. & Peake, N. 2018 An analytically-based method for predicting the noise generated by the interaction between turbulence and a serrated leading edge. J. Sound Vib. 422, 506525.Google Scholar
Myers, M. R. & Kerschen, E. J. 1995 Influence of incidence angle on sound generation by airfoils interacting with high-frequency gusts. J. Fluid Mech. 292, 271304.Google Scholar
Narayanan, S., Chaitanya, P., Haeri, S., Joseph, P. F., Kim, J. W. & Polacsek, C. 2015 Airfoil noise reductions through leading edge serrations. Phys. Fluids 27, 025109.Google Scholar
Peake, N. & Parry, A. B. 2012 Modern challenges facing turbomachinery aeroacoustics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 44, 227248.Google Scholar
Turner, J. M. & Kim, J. W. 2017 Aeroacoustic source mechanisms of a wavy leading edge undergoing vortical disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 811, 582611.Google Scholar