Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T15:18:46.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bed forms due to mass transfer in turbulent flows: a kaleidoscope of phenomena

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

J. R. L. Allen
J. R. L. Allen
Affiliation:
Sedimentology Research Laboratory, Department of Geology, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper gives a brief account and interpretation of bed forms produced during mass transfer from beds of hardened Plaster of Paris (calcium sulphate) exposed to turbulent streams of water. Defects within or upon the initially plane plaster beds perturbed the profile of mass-transfer (solution) rate as the result of the setting up of separated flows. Those defects that exceeded a certain critical dimension set by flow conditions grew in length, breadth and depth into heel-shaped hollows of parabolic plan called flutes. The continued growth and eventual interference of coextensive flutes gave rise to a bed with scallops, an assemblage of intersecting, saucer-shaped depressions. Defects which fell below the critical dimension set by flow conditions grew initially in length and breadth to give long, narrow grooves lying parallel with flow, but after a sufficient time were erased so that the bed reverted to plane. Many plane beds became fashioned into continuous systems of very long furrows and ridges aligned parallel with flow and coupled with paired longitudinal vortices resembling Taylor–Görtler vortices klinematically. The dimensions and orientation of this structure suggested that Klineian streaks, which on rigid beds occur randomly in space and time, had become stabilized in space in the new context of the deformable beds. The furrows commonly experienced a higher-order instability which resulted in the production of secondary flutes and scallops similar to those resulting from pre-existing defects. All of the bed forms described are associated with separated flows, and it is suggested that separation of flow may be a phenomenon necessary for their maintenance and, in the case of flutes, perhaps also for their origin.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , 13 September 1971 , pp. 49 - 63
Copyright
© 1971 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. R. L. 1966 Note on the use of Plaster of Paris in flow visualization, and some geological applications. J. Fluid Mech., 25, 331–335.Google Scholar
Allen, J. R. L. 1969 Erosional current marks of weakly cohesive mud beds. J. Sedim. Petrol., 39, 601–623.Google Scholar
Allen, J. R. L. 1971 Transverse erosional marks of mud and rock: their physical basis and geological significance (to be published).
Baker, G. 1963 Form and sculpture of tektites. In Tektites (J. A. O'Keefe, ed.), pp. 1–24. Chicago Press.
Becker, H. A. & Massaro, T. A. 1968 Vortex evolution in a round jet. J. Fluid Mech., 31, 435–448.Google Scholar
Carey, K. L. 1966 Observed configuration and computed roughness of the underside of river ice, St. Croix River, Wisconsin. U.S. Geol. Survey Profess. Papers 550-B, B 192–198.Google Scholar
Chapman, D. R. & Larson, H. K. 1963 The lunar origin of tektites. NASA Tech. Note D-1556.Google Scholar
Curl, R. L. 1966 Scallops and flutes. Trans. Cave Research Group Great Britain, 7, 121–160.Google Scholar
Dzulynski, S. & Walton, E. K. 1965 Sedimentary Features of Flysch and Graywackes. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Galloway, T. R. & Sage, B. H. 1968 Thermal and material transfer from spheres. Prediction of local transport. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 11, 539–549.Google Scholar
Kline, S. J., Reynolds, W. C., Schraub, F. H. & Rundstadler, P. W. 1967 The structure of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech., 30, 741–173.Google Scholar
Larsen, P. A. 1969 Head losses caused by ice cover on open channeIs. J. Boston Soc. Civ. Engrs., 56, 45–67.Google Scholar
Linton, M. & Sutherland, K. L. 1960 Transfer from a sphere into a fluid in a laminar flow. Chem. Engrng Sci., 12, 214–229.Google Scholar
Nininger, H. H. 1959 Out of the Sky. New York: Dover.
Ollier, C. D. & Trattman, E. K. 1969 Geomorphology of the caves. In The Caves of Northwest Clare, Ireland (E. K. Trattman, ed.), pp. 59–95. Newton Abbot: David and Charles.
Pettijohn, F. J. & Potter, P. E. 1964 Atlas and Glossary of Primary Sedimentary Structures. Berlin: Springer.
Prandtl, L. 1952 Essentials of Fluid Dynamics. London: Blackie.
Sato, H. 1956 Experimental investigation on the transition of a laminar separated layer. J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 11, 702–709.Google Scholar
Sato, H. 1959 Further investigations on the transition of two-dimensional separated layers at subsonic speeds. J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 14, 1797–1810.Google Scholar
Williams, D. T. 1959 A fluid dynamic mechanism of meteorite pitting. Smithsonian Contributions Astrophysics, 3, 47–67.Google Scholar
Wortmann, F. X. 1969 Visualization of transition. J. Fluid Mech., 38, 473–480.Google Scholar