Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T16:17:17.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of viscosity on gravity waves and the upper boundary condition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

Michael Yanowitch
Affiliation:
Adelphi University, Garden City, New York

Abstract

The linearized problem of two-dimensional gravity waves in a viscous incompressible stratified fluid occupying the upper half-space z > 0 is investigated. It is assumed that the dynamic viscosity coefficient μ is constant and that the density distribution ρ(z) is exponential. This leads to a fourth-order differential equation in the z co-ordinate, the coefficients of which depend on ρ(z) and on a dimensionless parameter ε which is proportional to μ/σ, σ being the frequency of the oscillation. The problem is solved for small ε. It is found that there is a region in which the solutions behave like certain solutions of the inviscid problem (with ε = 0). However, when the solutions of the inviscid problem are wave-like in z, they do not satisfy the radiation condition. This is because the viscosity, in addition to damping the motion for large z, reflects waves. The appropriate solution of the inviscid problem consists, therefore, of an incident and a reflected wave. As μ → 0, the ratio of the amplitudes of the reflected and the incident wave approaches exp (− 2π2H/Λ), where Λ is the vertical wavelength, and H the density scale height. The solution, however, does not have a limit since the reflecting layer shifts, altering the phase of the reflected wave. The results of the analysis are supplemented by a number of numerically computed solutions, which are then used to discuss the validity of the linearization.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1967 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chandrasekhar, S. 1961 Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability. Oxford University Press.
Crapper, G. D. 1958 J. Fluid Mech. 6, 51.
Eckart, C. 1960 Hydrodynamics of Oceans and Atmospheres. New York: Pergamon Press.
Eliassen, A. 1948 Geof. Publ. 17, No. 3.
Ford, W. B. 1960 Studies on Divergent Series and Summability and The Asymptotic Development of Functions Defined by Maclaurin Series. New York: Chelsea Publishing Company.
Golitsyn, G. S. 1965 Izv. Acad. Sc. USSR, Atmos. Ocean. Phys. (trans.) 1, 82.
Jacchia, L. & Kopal, Z. 1951 J. Meteor. 9, 13.
Lamb, H. 1932 Hydrodynamics, 6th ed. Cambridge University Press.
Lyra, G. 1943 Z. angew. Math. Mech. 23, 1.
Palm, E. 1953 Astr. Norvegica, 5, no. 3.
Palm, E. 1958 Q. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 84, 464.
Pekeris, C. L. 1937 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 158, 650.
Pitteway, M. L. V. & Hines, C. O. 1963 Can. J. Phys. 41, 1935.
Scorer, R. S. 1958 Q. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 84, 182.
Siebert, M. 1961 Advances in Geophysics, 7, 105188. New York: Academic Press.
Weekes, K. & Wilkes, M. V. 1947 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 192, 80.
Wilkes, M. V. 1949 Oscillations of the Earth's Atmosphere. Cambridge University Press.
Wurtele, M. 1953 Univ. Calif., Dept. Meteor., Sci. Rept. no. 3, Contract no. AF 19(122)-263.
Yanowitch, M. 1967 Can. J. Phys. To appear.