Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T01:52:56.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flow past a thin, inflated lenticular aerofoil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2006

B. G. Newman
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
M.-C. Tse
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

Abstract

A study has been made of the flow past thin, inflated lenticular aerofoils at zero angle of incidence. The configuration is an idealization of the flow past long low inflated buildings when the effects of the earth's boundary layer are neglected. It is shown theoretically, and confirmed experimentally, that the non-dimensional tension coefficient in the inflated membranes comprising the aerofoil is a unique function of the internal pressure coefficient divided by the square root of the excess-length ratio. This applies for excess length ratios up to at least 0·05 which corresponds to a thickness-to-chord ratio, wind off, of 0·28. The aerofoil is found to become unstable at negative internal pressures corresponding to tension coefficients of approximately 0·4.

The theory has also been used to predict the shape of the aerofoil and the pressure distribution over it. With increasing wind speed at positive internal pressures, the membrane theoretically changes shape from a circular arc to a form involving inflexion points and in all cases the contours are symmetrical about the half-chord point. The non-dimensional membrane slope at the leading and trailing edges agrees fairly well with the experimental values. However, the measured pressure distributions show some fore-and-aft asymmetry and the maximum thickness is slightly downwind of the half-chord point. Nevertheless the comparison between theory and experiment is satisfactory for small values of the excess-length ratio.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1980 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Goland, D. 1980 Two-dimensional inflated buildings in a cross wind. M.Eng. thesis. McGill University.
Herzog, T. 1976 Pneumatic Structures. Oxford University Press.
Kamrass, M. 1954 Wind-tunnel tests on a 1/24th scale model air-supported radome and tower. Cornell Aero. Lab. Rep. UB-909-D-1.Google Scholar
Milne Thomson, L. N. 1958 Theoretical Aerodynamics, 3rd. MacMillan.
Nielsen, J. N. 1963 Theory of flexible aerodynamic surfaces. Trans. A.S.M.E. E, J. Appl. Mech. 30, 435442.Google Scholar
Niemann, H. J. 1972 Wind tunnel experiments on aeroelastic models of air-supported structures. Proc. Int. Symp. on Pneumatic Structures, Delft, paper 5–11.
Pankhurst, R. C. & Holder, D. W. 1952 Wind-Tunnel Technique. London: Pitman.
Simiu, E. & Scanlan, R. H. 1978 Wind Effects on Structures. Wiley.
Thwaites, B. 1960 Incompressible Aerodynamics. Oxford University Press.
Thwaites, B. 1961 The aerodynamic theory of sails. I. Two-dimensional sails. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 261, 402422.Google Scholar
Wygnanski, I. & Gartshore, I. S. 1963 General description and calibration of the McGill 17 in. $30 in. blower cascade wind tunnel. McGill Univ. Mech. Engng Res. Lab. Tech. Note 63-7.Google Scholar