Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-jhxnr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T06:16:27.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flow structure behind two staggered circular cylinders. Part 1. Downstream evolution and classification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2008

J. C. HU
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
Y. ZHOU*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: mmyzhou@polyu.edu.hk

Abstract

Flow structures, Strouhal numbers and their downstream evolutions in the wake of two-staggered circular cylinders are investigated at Re=7000 using hot-wire, flow-visualization and particle-image velocimetry techniques. The cylinder centre-to-centre pitch, P, ranges from 1.2d to 4.0d (d is the cylinder diameter) and the angle (α) between the incident flow and the line through the cylinder centres is 0° ~ 90°. Four distinct flow structures are identified at x/d ≥ 10 (x is the downstream distance from the mid-point between the cylinders), i.e. two single-street modes (S-I and S-II) and two twin-street modes (T-I and T-II), based on Strouhal numbers, flow topology and their downstream evolution. Mode S-I is further divided into two different types, i.e. S-Ia and S-Ib, in view of their distinct vortex strengths. Mode S-Ia occurs at P/d ≤ 1.2. The pair of cylinders behaves like one single body, and shear layers separated from the free-stream sides of the cylinders roll up, forming one street of alternately arranged vortices. The street is comparable to that behind an isolated cylinder in terms of the topology and strength of vortices. Mode S-Ib occurs at α ≤ 10° and P/d > 1.5. Shear layers separated from the upstream cylinder reattach on or roll up to form vortices before reaching the downstream cylinder, resulting in postponed flow separation from the downstream cylinder. A single vortex street thus formed is characterized by significantly weakened vortices, compared with Mode S-Ia. Mode S-II is identified at P/d=1.2~2.5 and α>20° or 1.5≤P/d≤4.0 and 10° < α≤20°, where both cylinders generate vortices, with vortex shedding from the upstream cylinder at a much higher frequency than from the downstream, producing two streets of different widths and vortex strengths at x/d≤5.0. The two streets interact vigorously, resulting in a single street of the lower-frequency vortices at x/d≥10. The vortices generated by the downstream cylinder are significantly stronger than those, originating from the upstream cylinder, in the other row. Mode T-I occurs at P/d≥2.5 and α=20°~88°; the two cylinders produce two streets of different vortex strengths and frequencies, both persisting beyond x/d=10. At P/d≥2.5 and α≥88°, the two cylinders generate two coupled streets, mostly anti-phased, of the same vortex strength and frequency (St≈0.21), which is referred to as Mode T-II. The connection of the four modes with their distinct initial conditions, i.e. interactions between shear layers around the two cylinders, is discussed.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akbari, M. H. & Price, S. J. 2005 J. Fluids Struct. 20, 533554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alam, M. M. & Sakamoto, H. 2005 J. Fluids Struct. 20, 425449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bearman, P. W. & Wadcock, A. J. 1973 J. Fluid Mech. 61, 499511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, Z. F. & Sun, T. F. 1999 J. Wind Engng Indust. Aerodyn. 80, 287309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, Z. F., Sun, T. F., He, D. X. & Zhang, L. L. 1993 J. Wind Engng Indust. Aerodyn. 49, 379388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, J. C., Zhou, Y. & Dalton, C. 2006 Exps. Fluids 40, 116118.Google Scholar
Huang, J. F., Zhou, Y. & Zhou, T. M. 2006 Exps. Fluids 40, 884896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishigai, S., Nishikawa, E., Nishimura, E. & Cho, K. 1972 Bull. JSME 15, 949956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishigai, S., Nishikawa, E. & Yagi, E. 1973 In Pro. Symp. on Marine Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 1-5-2–1-5-33.Google Scholar
Igarashi, T. 1981 Bull. JSME 24, 323331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Igarashi, T. 1984 Bull. JSME 27, 23802387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H. J. & Durbin, P. A. 1988 J. Fluid Mech. 196, 431448.Google Scholar
Kiya, M., Arie, M., Tamura, H. & Mori, H. 1980 Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 102, 166173.Google Scholar
Kolár, V., Lyn, D. A. & Rodi, W. 1997 J. Fluid Mech. 346, 201237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahir, N. & Rockwell, D. 1996 J. Fluids Struct. 10, 473489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, S. J. 1976 Aero. Q. 27, 154168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, S. J. & Païdoussis, M. P. 1984 J. Wind Engng Indust. Aerodyn. 17, 329347.Google Scholar
Raffel, M., Willert, C. E. & Kompenhans, J. 1998 Particle Image Velocity: A Practical Guide. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, D. & Richards, M. D. 2003 J. Fluids Struct. 17, 345350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, D., Price, S. J. & Païdoussis, M. P. 2000 J. Fluid Mech. 411, 263303.Google Scholar
Sumner, D., Wong, S. S. T., Price, S. J. & Païdoussis, M. P. 1999 J. Fluids Struct. 13, 309338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, D., Richard, M. D. & Akosile, O. O. 2005 J. Fluids Struct. 20, 255276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, T. F., Gu, Z. F., He, D. X. & Zhang, L. L. 1992 J. Wind Engng Indust. Aerodyn. 41, 577588.Google Scholar
Suzuki, N., Sato, H., Iuchi, M. & Yamamoto, S. 1971 In Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures, Intl Wind Conf., Tokyo, Part II, pp. 20-1–20-10.Google Scholar
Wang, H. F., Zhou, Y., Chan, C. K. & Lam, K. S. 2006 Phys. Fluids 18, 065106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z. J. & Zhou, Y. 2005 Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow. 26, 362377.Google Scholar
Williamson, C. H. K. 1985 J. Fluid Mech. 159, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, G. & Zhou, Y. 2004 Exps. Fluids 37, 248256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, S. J., Zhou, Y. & So, R. M. C. 2003 Phys. Fluids 15, 12141219.Google Scholar
Zdravkovich, M. M. 1977 Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 199, 618633.Google Scholar
Zdravkovich, M. M. 1985 J. Sound Vib. 101, 511521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zdravkovich, M. M. 1987 J. Fluids Struct. 1, 239261.Google Scholar
Zdravkovich, M. M. & Pridden, D. L. 1977 J. Indust. Aerodyn. 2, 255270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H. J. & Zhou, Y. 2001 Phys. Fluids 13, 36753686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y. & Yiu, M. W. 2006 J. Fluid Mech. 548, 1748.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y., Wang, Z. J., So, R. M. C., Xu, S. J. & Jin, W. 2001 J. Fluid Mech. 443, 197229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., Zhang, H. J. & Yiu, M. W. 2002 J. Fluid Mech. 458, 303332.Google Scholar