Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T03:01:13.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The interaction between stirring and osmosis. Part 1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2006

T. J. Pedley
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge

Abstract

When pure solvent is separated from a solution of non-zero concentration Cb by a semi-permeable membrane, permeable to solvent (water) but not to solute, water flows osmotically across the membrane towards the solution. Its velocity J is given by J = PΔC, where P is a constant and ΔC is the concentration difference across the membrane. Because the osmotic flow advects solute away from the membrane, ΔC is usually less than Cb, by a factor γ which depends on the thickness of and flow in a concentration boundary layer. In this paper the layer is analysed on the assumption that the stirring motions in the bulk solution, which counter the osmotic advection, can be represented as two-dimensional stagnation-point flow. The steady-state results are compared with those of the standard physiological model in which the layer has a given thickness δ and the osmotic advection is countered only by diffusion. It turns out that the standard theory, although mechanistically inadequate, accurately predicts the value of γ over a wide range of values of the governing parameter β = PCbδ/D (where D is the solute diffusivity) if δ is given by \[ \delta = 1.59\bigg(\frac{D}{\nu}\bigg)^{\frac{1}{3}}\bigg(\frac{\nu}{\alpha}\bigg)^{\frac{1}{2}}, \] where ν is the kinematic viscosity of the fluid and α is the stirring parameter. The final approach to the steady state is also analysed, and it is shown to be achieved in a time scale (D/ν)1/3k′ where k′ is a dimensionless number whose dependence on β is computed. Moreover, if β exceeds a certain critical value (≈ 10), the approach to the steady state is not monotonic but takes the form of a damped oscillation (in practice, however, β is unlikely to rise significantly above 1). The theory is extended to the case where the solute concentration is non-zero on both sides of the membrane and in that case it is shown that J is bounded as β → ∞.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1980 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. 1964 Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Washington: National Bureau of Standards.
Dainty, J. 1963 Water relations of plant cells. Adv. Bot. Res. 1, 279326.Google Scholar
Derzansky, L. J. & Gill, W. N. 1974 Mechanisms of brine-side mass transfer in a horizontal reverse osmosis tubular membrane. A.I.Ch.E. J. 20, 751761.Google Scholar
Everitt, C. T. & Haydon, D. A. 1969 Influence of diffusion layers during osmotic flow across bimolecular lipid membranes. J. Theor. Biol. 22, 919.Google Scholar
Hendricks, T. J. & Williams, F. A. 1971 Diffusion-layer structure in reverse osmosis channel flow. Desalination 9, 155180.Google Scholar
Hill, A. E. 1979 Osmosis. Q. Rev. Biophys. 12, 6799.Google Scholar
House, C. R. 1974 Water Transport in Cells and Tissues. London: E. Arnold.
Johnson, A. R. & Acrivos, A. 1969 Concentration polarisation in reverse osmosis under natural convection. Ind. Engng Chem. Fund. 8, 359361.Google Scholar
Lerche, D. 1976 Temporal and local concentration changes in diffusion layers at cellulose membranes due to concentration differences between the solutions on both sides of the membranes. J. Memb. Biol. 27, 193205.Google Scholar
Pedley, T. J. & Fischbarg, J. 1978 The development of osmotic flow through an unstirred layer. J. Theor. Biol. 70, 426446.Google Scholar
Pedley, T. J. & Fischbarg, J. 1980 Unstirred layer effects in osmotic water flow across gallbladder epithelium. J. Memb. Biol. 54, 89102.Google Scholar
Pretsch, J. 1944 Die laminare Grenzschichte bei starkem Absaugen und Ausblasen. Untersuch. Mitt. deutsch. Luftfahrtf. no. 3091.Google Scholar
Proudman, I. 1960 An example of steady laminar flow at large Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 9, 593602.Google Scholar
Rosenhead, L. 1963 Laminar Boundary Layers. Clarendon.
Schafer, J. A., Patlak, C. S. & Andreoli, T. E. 1974 Osmosis in cortical collecting tubules. J. Gen. Physiol. 64, 201227.Google Scholar
Schlichting, H. & Bussman, K. 1943 Exakte Lösungen für die laminare Reibungsschicht mit Absaugung und Ausblasen. Schr. dtsch. Akad. Luftfahrtf. B 7, 2569.Google Scholar