Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T15:21:13.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Near-wall measurements in a three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 1997

DEBORA A. COMPTON
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, Boston MA 02215, USA
JOHN K. EATON
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305, USA

Abstract

An experiment was performed to measure near-wall velocity and Reynolds stress profiles in a pressure-driven three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer. An initially two-dimensional boundary layer (Reθ≈4000) was exposed to a strong spanwise pressure gradient. At the furthest downstream measurement locations there was also a fairly strong favourable streamwise pressure gradient.

Measurements were made using a specially designed near-wall laser-Doppler anemometer (LDA), in addition to conventional methods. The LDA used short focal length optics, a mirror probe suspended in the flow, and side-scatter collection to achieve a measuring volume 35 μm in diameter and approximately 65 μm long.

The data presented include mean velocity measurements and Reynolds stresses, all extending well below y+=10, at several profile locations. Terms of the turbulent kinetic energy transport equation are presented at two profile locations. The mean flow is nearly collateral (i.e. W is proportional to U) at the wall. Turbulent kinetic energy is mildly suppressed in the near-wall region and the shear stress components are strongly affected by three-dimensionality. As a result, the ratio of shear stress to turbulent kinetic energy is suppressed throughout most of the boundary layer. The angles of stress and strain are misaligned, except very near the wall (around y+=10) where the angles nearly coincide with the mean flow angle. Three-dimensionality appears to mildly reduce the production of turbulent kinetic energy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)