Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T09:03:26.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observation and analysis of the Mach reflection of weak uniform plane shock waves. Part 1. Observations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

J. M. Dewey
Affiliation:
University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C., Canada V8W 2Y2
D. J. McMillin
Affiliation:
University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C., Canada V8W 2Y2

Abstract

Shock fronts and fluid-particle trajectories throughout a two-dimensional shock wave flow have been measured by multiple schlieren photography in a detailed study of the Mach reflection from a 10° wedge of plane uniform shocks with Mach numbers of 1.105, 1.240 and 1.415. Correction of optical distortions throughout the field of view permitted the positions and shapes of the shock fronts and the magnitudes and directions of the particle velocities to be measured with a high degree of accuracy. No departure from self-similarity of the flow fields could be detected. The cross-sections of the reflected shocks were found to be circular and centred on a point which moved with the velocity of the flow behind the incident shock. The triple-point trajectories were linear. The velocity of the curved Mach stem shock was found to be constant at any one height above the wedge surface and to decrease monotonically with height. A deviation from perpendicularity was noticed where the Mach stems met the surface of the wedge, the shocks having a slight forward inclination of as much as 1°. The experimental results cannot be completely explained using the classical three-shock theory and an alternative model for weak Mach reflection is developed in Part 2 of this paper.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1985 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ben-Dor, G. 1980 Can. Aero. & Space J. 26, 98.
Ben-Dor, G. & Glass, I. I. 1978 AIAA J. 16, 1146.
Ben-Dor, G. & Glass, I. I. 1979 J. Fluid Mech. 92, 459.
Ben-Dor, G. & Glass, I. I. 1980 J. Fluid Mech. 96, 735.
Ben-Dor, G., Whitten, B. T. & Glass, I. I. 1979 Intl J. Heat and Fluid Flow 1. 77.
Boys, C. V. 1893 Nature 47. 440.
Dewey, J. M. 1964 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 279, 366.
Dewey, J. M. 1971 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 324, 275.
Dewey, J. M., Heilig, W., Reichenbach, H. & Walker, D. K. 1983 In Proc. 3rd Intl Symp. Flow Visualization, p. 585.
Dewey, J. M. & McMillin, D. J. 1981 Can. J. Phys. 59, 1380.
Dewey, J. M., McMillin, D. J. & Classen, D. F. 1977 J. Fluid Mech. 81. 701.
Dewey, J. M. & McMillin, D. J. 1985 J. Fluid Mech. 152, 6781.
Dewey, J. M. & Walker, D. K. 1975 J. Appl. Phys. 46, 3454.
Dewey, J. M. & Whitten, B. T. 1975 Phys. Fluids 18, 437.
Henderson, L. F. 1983 In Proc. 14th Sym. Shock Tube & Waves, p. 144.
Henderson, L. F. & Lozzi, A. 1979 J. Fluid Mech. 94, 541.
Henderson, L. F. & Siegenthaler, A. 1980 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 369, 537.
International Civil Aviation Organization Standard Atmosphere (U. S. Extension To) 1958 As quoted in Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 56th ed., F-201. CRC Press. Cleveland.
Jones, D. M., Martin, P. M. E. & Thornhill, G. K. 1951 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 209, 238.
Mach, E. 1878 Akad. Wiss. Wien 77, 1228.
Walker, D. K., Scotten, L. N. & Dewey, J. M. 1982 In. Proc. 15th Intl Cong. High Speed Photo. and Photonics, SPIE 348, 125.Google Scholar