Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T02:57:56.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On shock-induced light-fluid-layer evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2021

Yu Liang Open the ORCID record for Yu Liang [Opens in a new window]  and
Xisheng Luo Open the ORCID record for Xisheng Luo [Opens in a new window]
Yu Liang
Affiliation:
NYUAD Research Institute, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi 129188, UAE Advanced Propulsion Laboratory, Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, PR China
Xisheng Luo*
Affiliation:
Advanced Propulsion Laboratory, Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, PR China
*
†Email address for correspondence: xluo@ustc.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Shock-induced light-fluid-layer evolution is firstly investigated experimentally and theoretically. Specifically, three quasi-one-dimensional helium gas layers with different layer thicknesses are generated to study the wave patterns and interface motions. Six quasi-two-dimensional helium gas layers with diverse layer thicknesses and amplitude combinations are created to explore the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability of a light-fluid layer. Due to the multiple reflected shocks reverberating inside a light-fluid layer, the speeds of the two interfaces gradually converge, and the layer thickness saturates eventually. A general one-dimensional theory is adopted to describe the two interfaces’ motions and the layer thickness variations. It is found that, for the first interface, the end time of its phase reversal determines the influence of the reflected shocks on it. However, the reverberated shocks indeed lead to the second interface being more unstable. When the two interfaces are initially in phase, and the initial fluid layer is very thin, the two interfaces’ spike heads collide and stabilise the two interfaces. Linear and nonlinear models are successfully adopted by considering the interface-coupling effect and the reverberated shocks to predict the two interfaces’ perturbation growths in all regimes. The interfacial instability of a light-fluid layer is quantitatively compared with that of a heavy-fluid layer. It is concluded that the kind of waves reverberating inside a fluid layer significantly affects the fluid-layer evolution.

JFM classification

Compressible Flows: Shock waves
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 933 , 25 February 2022 , A10
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balakumar, B.J., Orlicz, G.C., Ristorcelli, J.R., Balasubramanian, S., Prestridge, K.P. & Tomkins, C.D. 2012 Turbulent mixing in a Richtmyer–Meshkov fluid layer after reshock: velocity and density statistics. J. Fluid Mech. 696, 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balakumar, B.J., Orlicz, G.C., Tomkins, C.D. & Prestridge, K. 2008 Simultaneous particle-image velocimetry-planar laser-induced fluorescence measurements of Richtmyer–Meshkov instability growth in a gas curtain with and without reshock. Phys. Fluids 20, 124103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouillette, M. 2002 The Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 34, 445–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budzinski, J.M., Benjamin, R.F. & Jacobs, J.W. 1994 Influence of initial conditions on the flow patters of a shock-accelerated thin fluid layer. Phys. Fluids 6, 3510–3512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimonte, G. & Ramaprabhu, P. 2010 Simulations and model of the nonlinear Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. Phys. Fluids 22, 014104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, J., Li, J., Sun, R., Zhai, Z. & Luo, X. 2019 Convergent Richtmyer–Meshkov instability of a heavy gas layer with perturbed outer interface. J. Fluid Mech. 878, 277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, R.P. 2018 High-Energy-Density Physics: Foundation of Inertial Fusion and Experimental Astrophysics. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, B.M., et al. 2021 Constraining computational modeling of indirect drive double shell capsule implosions using experiments. Phys. Plasmas 28 (3), 032709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, J.W., Jenkins, D.G., Klein, D.L. & Benjamin, R.F. 1995 Nonlinear growth of the shock-accelerated instability of a thin fluid layer. J. Fluid Mech. 295, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, J.W., Klein, D.L., Jenkins, D.G. & Benjamin, R.F. 1993 Instability growth patterns of a shock-accelerated thin fluid layer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 583–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuranz, C.C., et al. 2018 How high energy fluxes may affect Rayleigh–Taylor instability growth in young supernova remnants. Nat. Commun. 9, 1564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liang, Y., Liu, L., Zhai, Z., Si, T. & Wen, C.-Y. 2020 Evolution of shock-accelerated heavy gas layer. J. Fluid Mech. 886, A7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Y. & Luo, X. 2021 a On shock-induced heavy-fluid-layer evolution. J. Fluid Mech. 920, A13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Y. & Luo, X. 2021 b Shock-induced dual-layer evolution. J. Fluid Mech. 929, R3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Y., Zhai, Z., Ding, J. & Luo, X. 2019 Richtmyer–Meshkov instability on a quasi-single-mode interface. J. Fluid Mech. 872, 729–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindl, J., Landen, O., Edwards, J., Moses, E. & Team, N. 2014 Review of the national ignition campaign 2009–2012. Phys. Plasmas 21, 020501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, L., Liang, Y., Ding, J., Liu, N. & Luo, X. 2018 An elaborate experiment on the single-mode Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. J. Fluid Mech. 853, R2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, X., Liang, Y., Si, T. & Zhai, Z. 2019 Effects of non-periodic portions of interface on Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. J. Fluid Mech. 861, 309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meshkov, E.E. 1969 Instability of the interface of two gases accelerated by a shock wave. Fluid Dyn. 4, 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, K.A. & Blewett, P.J. 1972 Numerical investigation of the stability of a shock-accelerated interface between two fluids. Phys. Fluids 15, 753–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikaelian, K.O. 1985 Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities in stratified fluids. Phys. Rev. A 31, 410–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikaelian, K.O. 1996 Numerical simulations of Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities in finite-thickness fluid layers. Phys. Fluids 8 (5), 1269–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, D.S., et al. 2018 Design considerations for indirectly driven double shell capsules. Phys. Plasmas 25 (9), 092706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishihara, K., Wouchuk, J.G., Matsuoka, C., Ishizaki, R. & Zhakhovsky, V.V. 2010 Richtmyer–Meshkov instability: theory of linear and nonlinear evolution. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 368, 1769–1807.Google ScholarPubMed
Olmstead, D., Wayne, P., Yoo, J.-H., Kumar, S., Truman, C.R. & Vorobieff, P. 2017 Experimental study of shock-accelerated inclined heavy gas cylinder. Exp. Fluids 58 (6), 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlicz, G.C., Balakumar, B.J., Tomkins, C.D. & Prestridge, K.P. 2009 A Mach number study of the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability in a varicose, heavy-gas curtain. Phys. Fluids 21 (6), 064102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlicz, G.C., Balasubramanian, S. & Prestridge, K.P. 2013 Incident shock Mach number effects on Richtmyer–Meshkov mixing in a heavy gas layer. Phys. Fluids 25 (11), 114101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prestridge, K., Vorobieff, P., Rightley, P.M. & Benjamin, R.F. 2000 Validation of an instability growth model using particle image velocimtery measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4353–4356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayleigh, Lord 1883 Investigation of the character of the equilibrium of an incompressible heavy fluid of variable density. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 14, 170–177.Google Scholar
Richtmyer, R.D. 1960 Taylor instability in shock acceleration of compressible fluids. Commun. Pure Appl. Maths 13, 297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rightley, P.M., Vorobieff, P. & Benjamin, R.F. 1997 Evolution of a shock-accelerated thin fluid layer. Phys. Fluids 9 (6), 1770–1782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero, B.E., Poroseva, S., Vorobieff, P. & Reisner, J. 2021 Shock driven Kelvin–Helmholtz instability. AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, R., Ding, J., Zhai, Z., Si, T. & Luo, X. 2020 Convergent Richtmyer–Meshkov instability of heavy gas layer with perturbed inner surface. J. Fluid Mech. 902, A3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. 1950 The instability of liquid surfaces when accelerated in a direction perpendicular to their planes. I. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 201 (1065), 192–196.Google Scholar
Tomkins, C., Kumar, S., Orlicz, G. & Prestridge, K. 2008 An experimental investigation of mixing mechanisms in shock-accelerated flow. J. Fluid Mech. 611, 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomkins, C.D., Balakumar, B.J., Orlicz, G., Prestridge, K.P. & Ristorcelli, J.R. 2013 Evolution of the density self-correlation in developing Richtmyer–Meshkov turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 735, 288–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velikovich, A.L. & Dimonte, G. 1996 Nonlinear perturbation theory of the incompressible Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (17), 3112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhai, Z., Zou, L., Wu, Q. & Luo, X. 2018 Review of experimental Richtmyer–Meshkov instability in shock tube: from simple to complex. Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs 232, 2830–2849.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q. & Sohn, S.I. 1997 Nonlinear theory of unstable fluid mixing driven by shock wave. Phys. Fluids 9, 1106–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y. 2017 a Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instability induced flow, turbulence, and mixing. I. Phys. Rep. 720–722, 1–136.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. 2017 b Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instability induced flow, turbulence, and mixing. II. Phys. Rep. 723–725, 1–160.Google Scholar