Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T21:37:07.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the 3-D inverse potential target pressure problem. Part 2. Numerical aspects and application to duct design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

V. Dedoussis ,
P. Chaviaropoulos  and
K. D. Papailiou
V. Dedoussis
Affiliation:
National Technical University of Athens, Laboratory of Thermal Turbomachines, PO Box 64069, 157 10 Athens, Greece Department of Industrial Management, University of Piraeus, 185 34 Piraeus, Greece
P. Chaviaropoulos
Affiliation:
National Technical University of Athens, Laboratory of Thermal Turbomachines, PO Box 64069, 157 10 Athens, Greece
K. D. Papailiou
Affiliation:
National Technical University of Athens, Laboratory of Thermal Turbomachines, PO Box 64069, 157 10 Athens, Greece
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A potential function/stream function formulation is introduced for the solution of the fully 3-D inverse potential ‘target pressure’ problem. In the companion paper (Part 1) it is seen that the general 3-D inverse problem is ill-posed but accepts as a particular solution elementary streamtubes with orthogonal cross-section. Under this simplification, a novel set of flow equations was derived and discussed. The purpose of the present paper is to present the computational techniques used for the numerical integration of the flow and geometry equations proposed in Part 1. The governing flow equations are discretized with centred finite difference schemes on a staggered grid and solved in their linearized form using the preconditioned GMRES algorithm. The geometry equations which form a set of first-order o.d.e.s are integrated numerically using a second-order-accurate space marching scheme. The resulting computational algorithm is applied to a double turning duct and a 3-D converging-diverging nozzle ‘reproduction’ test case.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 282 , 10 January 1995 , pp. 147 - 162
Copyright
© 1995 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chaviaropoulos, P., Dedoussis, V. & Papailiou, K. D. 1995 On the 3-D inverse potential target pressure problem. Part 1. Theoretical aspects and method formulation. J. Fluid Mech. 282, 131–146.Google Scholar
Chaviaropoulos, P., Giannakoglou, K. & Papailiou, K. D. 1988 A novel scalar-vector potential formulation for the numerical solution of 3D steady inviscid rotational flow problems. AIAA J. 26, 1734–1739.Google Scholar
Giannakoglou, K., Chaviaropoulos, P. & Papailiou, K. D. 1988 Acceleration of standard full-potential and elliptic Euler solvers using preconditioned generalized minimal residual techniques. In Flows in Non-rotating Turbomachinery Components (ed. U. S. Rohatgi, A. Hamed & J. H. Kim). ASME FED Vol. 69, pp. 45–52.
Rao, K. V., Steger, J. L. & Pletcher, R. H. 1987 A three-dimensional dual potential procedure for inlets and indraft wind tunnels. AIAA Paper 87-0598.
Saad, Y. & Schultz, M. M. 1983 GMRES: A generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. Department of Computer Science, Yale University Rep. YALEU/DCS/RR-254.
Stanitz, J. D. 1985 General design method for three-dimensional potential flow fields. II-Computer program DIN3D1 for simple unbranched ducts. NASA CR 3926.
Yih, C. S. 1957 Stream functions in three-dimensional flows. Houille Blanche 12, 445–450.Google Scholar
Zedan, M. & Schneider, G. E. 1983 A three-dimensional modified strongly implicit procedure for heat conduction. AIAA J. 21, 295–303.Google Scholar