Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T23:25:29.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the outer-edge problem of a hypersonic boundary layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

Richard S. Lee
Affiliation:
McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Company-Western Division, Santa Monica, California
H. K. Cheng
Affiliation:
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

Abstract

Existing analytical treatments of the hypersonic strong interaction problem adopt the two-region structure of the classical boundary-layer theory; however, the uneven heating and external vorticity created by the highly curved, leading-edge shock wave leads to the question of the uniform validity of the boundary-layer approximation near the boundary-layer edge. Recently Bush (1966), using a non-linear viscosity-temperature law (μ ∞ Tω, ω < 1) instead of the linear one (μ ∞ T) used by previous investigators, demonstrated the need to analyze separately a transitional layer intermediate between the inviscid region and the boundary layer. In this paper, an asymptotic analysis of the Navier-Stokes equations in von Mises's variables, allowing a three-region structure, is carried out for the case of μ ∞ T. Results, with the second-order effects associated with heating and vorticity accounted for, show that a separate analysis of the transitional region is not strictly necessary in this case, and hence the equivalence of the two-region approach is confirmed. On the other hand, it is shown that the second-order boundary-layer correction owing to the heating and vorticity effects, not considered by Bush, is necessary in order to determine a uniformly valid temperature distribution in the physical variables. Numerical results for an insulated and a cold flat plate, considerably different from those of others, are obtained.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1969 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aroesty, J. 1964 Slip flow and hypersonic boundary layers AIAA J. 2, 189.Google Scholar
Bush, W. B. 1966 Hypersonic strong-interaction similarity solutions for flow past a flat plate J. Fluid Mech. 25, 51.Google Scholar
Cheng, H. K., Hall, J. G., Golian, T. C. & Hertzberg, A. 1961 Boundary-layer displacement and leading-edge bluntness effects in high-temperature hypersonic flow J. aeronaut. Sci. 28, 353.Google Scholar
Lees, L. 1953 On the boundary-layer equations in hypersonic flow and their approximate solutions J. aeronaut. Sci. 20, 143.Google Scholar
Lees, L. 1956 Influence of the leading-edge shock waves on the laminar boundary layer at hypersonic speeds J. aeronaut. Sci. 23, 594.Google Scholar
Matveeva, N. S. & Sychev, V. V. 1965 On the theory of strong interaction of the boundary layer with an inviscid hypersonic flow PMM 29, 644.Google Scholar
Oguchi, H. 1958 First-order approach to a strong interaction problem in hypersonic flow over an insulated flat plate. Aeronautical Research Institute University of Tokyo, Report no. 330.Google Scholar
Stewartson, K. 1955 On the motion of a flat plate at high speeds in a viscous compressible fluid, II. Steady motion J. aeronaut. Sci. 22, 303.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, M. D. 1962 Higher approximations in boundary-layer theory. Part 1. General analysis J. Fluid Mech. 14, 161.Google Scholar