Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-14T21:55:31.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the rheology of a suspension of viscoelastic spheres in a viscous liquid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

R. Roscoe
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of Newcastle upon Tyne

Abstract

The stress in a suspension of incompressible deformable particles exceeds that which would exist in the pure incompressible liquid undergoing the same flow by the product of the volume concentration of the particles and the tensor $\overline{p}_{ik} - 2\eta_0 e^{-(1)}_{ik}$ where η0 is the viscosity of the pure liquid, $\overline{p}_{ik}$ is the average stress and $e^{-(1)}_{ik}$ the average rate of strain in particles in the flowing suspension. For a dilute suspension of viscoelastic spheres these tensors can be determined by using an adaptation of Jeffery's solution of the problem of an isolated rigid ellipsoid. In steady laminar flow, the material of each sphere is continuously deformed and rotates within an ellipsoidal boundary of fixed dimensions and orientation. Approximate expressions are obtained for the steady-rate viscosity and normal stress differences in terms of the dynamic viscosity and dynamic rigidity functions of the suspension. These are valid either when the rate of shear is sufficiently small or when the ratio of the dynamic viscosity of the spheres to ηo is sufficiently large. The three normal stress components are all unequal. In slow steady elongation of the suspension, the spheres suffer static deformation into prolate spheroids so the elongational viscosity depends only on their static elastic properties. It appears from the investigation of special cases, however, that this static deformation is not possible for rates of elongation above a critical value.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1967 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burgers, J. M. 1938 2nd Report on Viscosity and Plasticity, p. 128. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.
Cerf, R. 1951 J. de Chimie Physique, 48, 5984.
Cerf, R. 1952 J. Chem. Phys. 20, 395402.
Coleman, B. D. & Markovitz, H. 1964 J. Appl. Phys. 35, 19.
Dewitt, T. W., Markovitz, H., Padden, F. J. & Zapas, L. J. 1955 J. Colloid Sci. 10, 17488.
Einstein, A. 1906 Ann. Phys. Lpz. 19, 289306.
Einstein, A. 1911 Ann. Phys. Lpz. 34, 5912.
Fröhlich, H. & Sack, R. 1946 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 185, 41530.
Giesekus, H. 1962 Rheol. Acta, 2, 5062.
Jeffery, G. B. 1922 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 102, 16179.
Kirkwood, J. G. 1946 J. Chem. Phys. 14, 516.
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. 1959 Fluid Mechanics, p. 76. London: Pergamon Press.
Lodge, A. S. 1964 Elastic Liquids, p. 118. London, New York: Academic Press.
Markovitz, H. & Williamson, R. B. 1957 Trans. Soc. Rheol. 1, 2536.
Padden, F. J. & Dewitt, J. W. 1954 J. Appl. Phys. 25, 108691.
Peterson, J. M. & Fixman, M. 1963 J. Chem. Phys. 39, 251623.
Roscoe, R. 1965 Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 16, 156771.
Saito, N. 1952 J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 7, 44750.