Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T18:53:13.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The stability of a water drop oscillating with finite amplitude in an electric field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

P. R. Brazier-Smith
P. R. Brazier-Smith
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado Present address: Physics Department, University of Manehester Institute of Science and Technology.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

By assuming that an uncharged drop situated in a uniform electric field E retains a spheroidal shape while oscillating about its equilibrium configuration, two approximate equations of motion are derived for the deformation ratio γ expressed as the ratio a/b of the major and minor axis of the drop. Solutions of these equations of motion indicate that the stability of a drop of undistorted radius R and surface tension T depends upon E(R/T)½ and the initial displacement of γ from its equilibrium value. The predictions of the two equations are compared to assess the accuracy of the spheroidal assumption as applied to such a dynamical situation. The analysis is used to determine the stability criterion of a drop subject to a step function field. Finally, the limit of validity of the spheroidal assumption is discussed in terms of Rayleigh's criterion for the stability of charged spherical drops. By applying Rayleigh's criterion to the poles of a spheroidal drop, the stage at which the drop departs from spheroidal form to form conical jets was approximately determined.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , 14 December 1971 , pp. 417 - 430
Copyright
© 1971 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ausman, E. L. & Brook, M. 1967 J. Geophys. Res. 72, 6131.
Billings, J. B. & Holland, D. F. 1969 J. Geophys. Res. 74, 6881.
Brazier-Smith, P. R. 1971 Phys. Fluids, 14, 1.
Brazier-Smith, P. R., Brook, M., Latham, J., Saunders, C. P. R. & Smith, M. H. 1971 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 322, 523.
Brook, M. & Latham, D. J. 1968 J. Geophys. Res. 73, 7137.
Ceandrasekhar, S. 1961 Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability. Clarendon.
Chandrasekhar, S. 1965 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 286, 1.
Chandrasekhar, S. 1969 Ellipsoidal Figures of Equilibrium. Yale University Press.
Jones, D. M. A. 1959 J. Meteorol. 16, 504.
Lamb, H. 1932 Hydrodynamics. Dover.
Macky, W. A. 1931 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 133, 565.
Nolan, J. J. 1926 Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. 37, 28.
O'Konski, C. T. & Thacher, H. C. 1953 J. Phys. Chem. 57, 955.
Rayleigh, Lord 1879 Proc. Roy. Soc. 29, 71.
Rayleigh, Lord 1882 Phil. Mag. 14, 184.
Rosenkilde, C. E. 1969 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 312, 473.
Taylor, G. I. 1964 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 280, 383.
Wilson, C. T. R. & Taylor, G. I. 1925 Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 22, 728.
Zeleny, J. 1915 Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 18, 71.
Zeleny, J. 1917 Phys. Rev. 10, 1.