Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T10:57:37.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Subharmonic resonance of Venice gates in waves. Part 1. Evolution equation and uniform incident waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 1997

PAOLO SAMMARCO
Affiliation:
Present address: DITS, University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’, Italy. Parsons Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
HOANG H. TRAN
Affiliation:
Parsons Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
CHIANG C. MEI
Affiliation:
Parsons Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

Abstract

For flood protection against storm tides, barriers of box-like gates hinged along a bottom axis have been designed to span the three inlets of the Venice Lagoon. While on calm days the gates are ballasted to rest horizontally on the seabed, in stormy weather they are raised by buoyancy to act as a dam which is expected to swing to and fro in unison in response to the normally incident sea waves. Previous laboratory experiments with sinusoidal waves have revealed however that neighbouring gates oscillate out of phase, at one half the wave frequency, in a variety of ways, and hence would reduce the effectiveness of the barrier. Extending the linear theory of trapped waves by Mei et al. (1994), we present here a nonlinear theory for subharmonic resonance of mobile gates allowed to oscillate about a vertical plane of symmetry. In this part (1) the evolution equation of the Landau–Stuart type is first derived for the gate amplitude. The effects of gate geometries on the coefficients in the equation are examined. After accounting for dissipation effects semi-empirically the theoretical results on the equilibrium amplitude excited by uniform incident waves are compared with laboratory experiments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)