Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-r7bls Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-18T22:00:15.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two-layer shallow-water dam-break solutions for non-Boussinesq gravity currents in a wide range of fractional depth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2011

MARIUS UNGARISH
MARIUS UNGARISH*
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel
*
†Email address for correspondence: unga@cs.technion.ac.il
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider the dam-break initial stage of propagation of a gravity current released from a lock of length x0 and height h0 into an ambient fluid in a channel of height H*. The system contains heavy and light fluids, of densities ρH and ρL, respectively. When the Reynolds number is large, the resulting flow is governed by the parameters R = ρL/ρH and H = H*/h0. We focus attention on non-Boussinesq effects, when the parameter R is not close to 1; in this case significant differences appear between the ‘light’ (top surface) current and the ‘heavy’ (bottom) current. We use a shallow-water two-layer formulations. We show that ‘exact’ solutions of the thickness and speed of the current and ambient can be obtained by the method of characteristics. However, this requires a careful matching with the conditions at the front (ambient) and the back (reservoir). We show that a jump, instead of a rarefaction wave, propagates into the reservoir when H < Hcrit(R), and solutions for these jumps are presented and discussed. The theory is applied to the full-depth lock-exchange H = 1 problem, and the results are compared with previous hydraulic models. The application of the theory is also illustrated for more general cases H > 1, including comparisons with the one-layer model results of Ungarish (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 579, 2007, p. 373).

Overall, the shallow-water two-layer theory yields consistent, self-contained, and physically acceptable analytical solutions for the dam-break problem over the full physical range of the R and H parameters, for both light-into-heavy and heavy-into-light gravity currents. The solution can be closed without adjustable constants or predetermined properties of the flow field. The thickness solution is formally valid until the jump, or rarefaction wave, hits the backwall; the speed of propagation prediction is valid until this reflected wave hits the nose, i.e. until the end of the slumping stage. This theory is a significant extension of the Boussinesq problem (recovered by the present solution for R = 1), which elucidates the non-Boussinesq effects during the first stage of propagation of lock-released gravity currents.

JFM classification

Geophysical and Geological Flows: Gravity currents
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 675 , 25 May 2011 , pp. 27 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baines, W. D., Rottman, J. W. & Simpson, J. E. 1985 The motion of constant-volume air cavities in horizontal tubes. J. Fluid Mech. 161, 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1968 Gravity currents and related phenomena. J. Fluid Mech. 31, 209–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birman, V. K., Martin, J. E. & Meiburg, E. 2005 The non-Boussinesq lock exchange problem. Part 2. High-resolution simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 537, 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonometti, T. & Balachandar, S. 2010 Slumping of non-Boussinesq gravity currents of various initial fractional depths: a comparison between direct numerical simulations and a recent shallow-water model. Comput. Fluids 39, 729–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonometti, T., Balachandar, S. & Magnaudet, J. 2008 Wall effects in non-Boussinesq density currents. J. Fluid Mech. 616, 445–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, Z. & Meiburg, E. 2010 Internal bores: an improved model via a detailed analysis of the energy budget. J. Fluid Mech. (submitted).Google Scholar
Etienne, J., Hopfinger, E. J. & Saramito, P. 2005 Numerical simulations of high density ratio lock-exchange flows. Phys. Fluids 17 (3), 036601–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gröbelbauer, H. P., Fanneløp, T. K. & Britter, R. E. 1993 The propagation of intrusion fronts of high density ratios. J. Fluid Mech. 250, 669–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, A. J. 2006 Lock-release gravity currents and dam-break flows. J. Fluid Mech. 569, 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, A. J. & Pritchard, D. 2004 The effects of hydraulic resistance on dam-break and other shallow inertial flows. J. Fluid Mech. 501, 179–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, J. J. & Chyou, Y.-P. 1991 On the hydraulic lock-exchange problem. ZAMP 42, 874–910.Google Scholar
Klemp, J. B., Rotunno, R. & Skamarock, W. C. 1994 On the dynamics of gravity currents in a channel. J. Fluid Mech. 269, 169–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemp, J. B., Rotunno, R. & Skamarock, W. C. 1997 On the propagation of internal bores. J. Fluid Mech. 331, 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, R. J., Rottman, J. W. & Linden, P. F. 2005 The non-Boussinesq lock exchange problem. Part 1. Theory and experiments. J. Fluid Mech. 537, 101–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rottman, J. & Simpson, J. 1983 Gravity currents produced by instantaneous release of a heavy fluid in a rectangular channel. J. Fluid Mech. 135, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotunno, R., Klemp, J. B., Bryan, G. H. & Muraki, D. J. 2011 Models of non-Boussinesq lock-exchange flow. J. Fluid Mech. 275, 1–26.Google Scholar
Ungarish, M. 2007 A shallow water model for high-Reynolds gravity currents for a wide range of density differences and fractional depths. J. Fluid Mech. 579, 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungarish, M. 2008 Energy balances and front speed conditions of two-layer models for gravity currents produced by lock release. Acta Mechanica 201, 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungarish, M. 2009 An Introduction to Gravity Currents and Intrusions. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungarish, M. 2010 a Energy balances for gravity currents with a jump at the interface produced by lock release. Acta Mechanica 211, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungarish, M. 2010 b The propagation of high-Reynolds-number non-Boussinesq gravity currents in axisymmetric geometry. J. Fluid Mech. 643, 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungarish, M. & Zemach, T. 2005 On the slumping of high-Reynolds-number gravity currents in two-dimensional and axisymmetric configurations. Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids 24, 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitham, G. B. 1974 Linear and Nonlinear Waves. Wiley.Google Scholar