Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-23T02:10:56.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The unsteady lift on a swept blade tip

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

N. Peake
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK

Abstract

Highly swept blades are now commonly used in modern aeroengines, and in this paper we solve a model problem of relevance to the understanding and prediction of noise generation by the interaction between incident vortical disturbances and such a blade. In order to include the potentially significant effects of the blade-tip region, we consider a (semi-infinite span) quarter-plane aligned at a non-zero sweep angle to supersonic mean flow, with a single harmonic gust incident on the quarterplane from upstream. The solution is completed using a novel application of the Wiener–Hopf technique, in which the usual factorisation is carried out with respect to two independent complex variables separately, and closed-form expressions for the practically important lift per unit span are derived for both the subsonic and the supersonic leading-edge regimes. The dependence of the unsteady response on the sweep angle and the gust wavenumbers is examined, and in particular we demonstrate that the magnitude of the effects of the tip region is significantly reduced by increasing the blade sweep or by considering gusts of higher frequency. It also becomes clear that the magnitude of the unsteady response can be either decreased or increased by sweeping the blade, in a way which proves highly dependent on the particular values of the flow parameters. In addition, we consider the two critical values of the gust trace speed along the leading edge which correspond to the sonic velocities in the two spanwise directions, and for which the chordwise oscillation of the unsteady lift distribution on an infinite-span blade vanishes. In these two cases, the lift per unit span (integrated over the infinite chord) is clearly singular, but we demonstrate that the effect of including the blade tip is to smooth out just one of these singularities, and replace it instead by a relatively large, but finite, value.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1994 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. G. 1968 Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover.
Adamczyk, J. J. 1974 Passage of a swept airfoil through an oblique gust J. Aircraft 11, 281287.Google Scholar
Amiet, R. K. 1976 High frequency thin-airfoil theory for subsonic flow. AIAA J. 14, 10761082.Google Scholar
Crighton, D. G. 1985 The Kutta condition in unsteady flow Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 17, 411445.Google Scholar
Envia, E. & Kerschen, E. J. 1984 Noise produced by the interaction of a rotor wake with a swept stator blade. AIAA Paper 84-326.
Goldstein, M. E. 1976 Aeroacoustics. McGraw Hill.
Hanson, D. B. 1980 Influence of propeller design parameters on far-field harmonic noise in forward flight. AIAA J. 18, 13131319.Google Scholar
Landahl, M. T. 1989 Unsteady Transonic Flow. Cambridge University Press.
Martinez, R. & Widnall, S. E. 1980 Unified aerodynamic-acoustic theory for a thin rectangular wing encountering a gust. AIAA J. 18, 636645.Google Scholar
Martinez, R. & Widnall, S. E. 1983 Aerodynamic theory for wing with side edge passing subsonically through a gust. AIAA J. 21, 808815.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1951 The oscillating rectangular airfoil at supersonic speeds Q. Appl. Maths 9, 4765.Google Scholar
Noble, B. 1958 Methods Based on the Wiener-Hopf Technique. Pergamon.
Peake, N. 1992 Unsteady transonic flow past a quarter-plane J. Fluid Mech. 244, 377404.Google Scholar
Peake, N. 1993 The interaction between a steady jet flow and a supersonic blade tip J. Fluid Mech. 248, 543566.Google Scholar