Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T09:58:24.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Upstream influence of a dipole in rotating flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

John W. Miles
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, La Jolla

Abstract

McIntyre (1972) has demonstrated that transient nonlinear self-interactions among the lee waves downstream of an obstacle in an axisymmetric, inviscid, rotating flow yield a columnar disturbance that moves upstream of the obstacle. This disturbance is calculated for a dipole, the moment of which increases slowly from 0 to a3, in a tube of radius R as a function of δ = a/R and K = 2ΩR/U (Ω and U being angular and axial velocities in basic flow). The asymptotic limit δ ↓ 0 with kK δ fixed, which is relevant for typical laboratory configurations and for the abstraction of unbounded flow, yields: (a) an upstream velocity with an axial peak of u0 = 0·011k5 δ U and a first zero at a radius of 2·8U/Ω; (b) an upstream energy flux of roughly $- \frac{3}{2}\pi\rho U^2 R^2 u_0$; (c) an upstream impulse flux of 0·20D (D = wave drag on dipole). The results (a) and (b), albeit based on the hypothesis of small disturbances, suggest that nonlinear self-interactions among the lee waves could be responsible for upstream blocking. The results (a) and (c) imply that, although upstream influence is absent from an unbounded (δ = 0) flow in the sense that the axial velocity vanishes like δ, it is present in the sense that approximately one-fifth of the impulse flux associated with the wave drag appears in the upstream flow.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1972 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benjamin, T. B. 1970 Upstream influence J. Fluid Mech. 40, 4979.Google Scholar
Goldstein, S. 1938 Modern Developments in Fluid Mechanics. Oxford University Press.
Long, R. R. 1953 Steady motion around a symmetrical obstacle moving along the axis of a rotating fluid J. Meteor. 10, 197203.Google Scholar
Maxworthy, T. 1970 The flow created by a sphere moving along the axis of a rotating, slightly viscous fluid: a Proudman—Taylor problem. J. Fluid Mech. 40, 453479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, M. E. 1972 On Long's hypothesis of no upstream influence in uniformly stratified or rotating flow J. Fluid Mech. 52, 209243.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1969 The lee-wave régime for a slender body in a rotating flow J. Fluid Mech. 36, 265288.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1970a The lee-wave régime for a slender body in a rotating flow. Part 2 J. Fluid Mech. 42, 201206.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1970b The oseenlet as a model for separated flow in a rotating viscous liquid J. Fluid Mech. 42, 207217.Google Scholar
Watson, G. N. 1945 A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions. Cambridge University Press.