Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T14:15:29.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Upstream propagation of unsteady disturbances in supersonic boundary layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

Wilhelm Schneider
Affiliation:
DFVLR-Institut für Theoretische Gasdynamik, Aachen, Germany Present address: Institut fur Gasdynamik und Thermodynamik, Technische Hochschule Wien, Karlsplatz, A-1040 Wien, Austria.

Abstract

It is shown that weak harmonic waves can propagate upstream in a supersonic stream along a plane wall over distances that are very large in comparison with the boundary-layer thickness. These waves are characterized by small reduced frequencies, large wavelengths and small phase velocities. Results are presented for the flow along a single plane wall and also for the flow between two plane parallel plates (channel flow).

The progressive-wave solutions are found by asymptotic expansions for small disturbances, large Reynolds numbers of the basic flow, and small reduced frequencies of the unsteady disturbances. It turns out that, as in the corresponding steady theory, four flow regions have to be distinguished: a middle layer which embraces most of the boundary layer; an inner layer near the wall; the outer flow field; and a transition layer between the middle layer and the outer layer. A quasi-steady treatment of the middle, transitional and outer layers is appropriate. Unsteady effects originate in the inner layer.

The relative importance of viscosity and unsteady effects with regard to the waves is characterized by a dimensionless parameter N which is the product of certain powers of the reduced frequency and the Reynolds number. For N → ∞ and a single wall, Lighthill's steady theory of upstream influence in supersonic boundary layers is recovered as a limiting case of the present theory.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1974 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. 1965 Handbook of Mathematical Functiom. Dover.
Dore, B. D. 1967 The upstream influence ahead of a weak, uniformly moving shock or expansive wave. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 20, 333345Google Scholar
Inger, G. R. & Williams, E. P. 1972 Subsonic and supersonic boundary-layer flow past a wavy wall. A.I.A.A. J. 10, 636642Google Scholar
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. 1959 Fluid Mechanics, p. 261. Pergamon.
Lighthill, M. J. 1953 On boundary layers and upstream influence. 11. Supersonic flows without separation. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 217, 468507.Google Scholar
Mcclure, J. D. 1962 On perturbed boundary layer flows. Fluid Dyn. Res. Lab. M.I.T., Rep. no. 62-2.Google Scholar
Müller, E.-A. 1953 Theoretische Untersuchungen über die Wechselwirkung zwischen einer einfallenden kleinen Störung und der Grenzschicht bei schnell strömenden Gaaen. Thesis, University of Gottingen.
Müller, E.-A. 1955 Theoretische Untersuchungen über die Wechselwirkung zwischen einem einfallenden schwachen VerdichtungstoB und der laminaren Grenzschicht in einer füberschallstromung. In 50 Jahre Grenzschichtforschzeng (ed. H. Görtler and W. Tollmien), pp. 343363. Vieweg.
Stewartson, K. 1964 The Theory of Laminar Boundary Layers in Compressible Fluids, § 7.3. Oxford University Press.
Van Dyee, M. 1964 Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics. Academic.