Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T23:53:05.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wave capture and wave–vortex duality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2005

OLIVER BÜHLER
Affiliation:
Center for Atmosphere Ocean Science at the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, NY 10012, USA
MICHAEL E. McINTYRE
Affiliation:
Centre for Atmospheric Science at the Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Rd., Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK

Abstract

New and unexpected results are presented regarding the nonlinear interactions between a wavepacket and a vortical mean flow, with an eye towards internal wave dynamics in the atmosphere and oceans and the problem of ‘missing forces’ in atmospheric gravity-wave parametrizations. The present results centre around a pre-wave-breaking scenario termed ‘wave capture’, which differs significantly from the standard such scenarios associated with critical layers or mean density decay with altitude. We focus on the peculiar wave–mean interactions that accompany wave capture. Examples of these interactions are presented for layerwise-two-dimensional, layerwise-non-divergent flows in a three-dimensional Boussinesq system, in the strong-stratification limit.

The nature of the interactions can be summarized in the phrase ‘wave–vortex duality’, whose key points are firstly that wavepackets behave in some respects like vortex pairs, as originally shown in the pioneering work of Bretherton (1969), and secondly that a collection of interacting wavepackets and vortices satisfies a conservation theorem for the sum of wave pseudomomentum and vortex impulse, provided that the impulse is defined appropriately. It must be defined as the rotated dipole moment of the Lagrangian-mean potential vorticity (PV). This PV differs crucially from the PV evaluated from the curl of either the Lagrangian-mean or the Eulerian-mean velocity. The results are established here in the strong-stratification limit for rotating (quasi-geostrophic) as well as for non-rotating systems. The concomitant momentum budgets can be expected to be relatively complicated, and to involve far-field recoil effects in the sense discussed in Bühler & McIntyre (2003). The results underline the three-way distinction between impulse, pseudomomentum, and momentum. While momentum involves the total velocity field, impulse and pseudomomentum involve, in different ways, only the vortical part of the velocity field.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)