Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T11:32:32.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2020

Amanda Edmonds*
Affiliation:
Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3
Pascale Leclercq
Affiliation:
Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3
*
*Corresponding author. Email: amanda.edmonds@univ-montp3.fr

Abstract

This special issue of the Journal of French Language Studies participates in the ‘methodological turn’ (Byrnes, 2013) in the field of Second Language Acquisition (SLA), by presenting five original articles that focus on different methodological issues in studies on various aspects of the acquisition of French as an additional language. We highlight the contributions of the five articles and situate them within the larger discussion on research methodology. We end by arguing for the need for additional attention to methodology in SLA.

Type
Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Byrnes, H. (2013). Notes from the editor. The Modern Language Journal, 97 (4): 825827.Google Scholar
Cuxac, C. (2014). Langues des signes : une modélisation sémiologique. La Nouvelle Revue de l’Adaptation et de la Scolarisation, 64: 6579.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1 (2): 131149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gudmestad, A. and Edmonds, A. (eds). (2018). Critical Reflections on Data in Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2012). The construct of language proficiency in the study of bilingualism from a cognitive perspective. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15 (2): 422433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joigneaux, C. (2013). La littératie précoce. Ce que les enfants font avec l’écrit avant qu’il ne leur soit enseigné. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 185: 117161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, W. and Perdue, C. (1997). The Basic Variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research, 13 (4): 301347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson-Hall, J. and Plonsky, L. (2015). Reporting and interpreting quantitative research findings: What gets reported and recommendations for the field. Language Learning, 65, Supp. 1: 127159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leclercq, P., Edmonds, A. and Hilton, H. (eds.), (2014). Measuring L2 Proficiency: Perspectives from SLA. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeser, M. J. and Sunderman, G. L. (2016). Methodological implications of working memory tasks for L2 processing research. In: Granena, G., Jackson, D. O. and Yilmaz, Y. (eds), Cognitive Individual Differences in Second Language Processing and Acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 89104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, E., Mackey, A. and Plonsky, L. (2016). The IRIS Repository: Advancing research practice and methodology. In: Mackey, A. and Marsden, E. (eds), Advancing Methodology and Practice: The IRIS Repository of Instruments for Research into Second Languages. New York: Routledge, pp. 121.Google Scholar
Marsden, E., Morgan-Short, K., Thompson, S. and Abugaber, D. (2018). Replication in second language research: Narrative and systematic reviews and recommendations for the field. Language Learning, 68 (2): 321391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. (2005). Methodology, epistemology, and ethics in instructed SLA research: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 89: 317327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. (2014). Study quality in quantitative L2 research (1990–2010): A methodological synthesis and call for reform. Modern Language Journal, 98: 450470.Google Scholar
Porte, G. and McManus, K. (2018). Doing Replication Research in Applied Linguistics. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. (1994). Assessment of L2 proficiency in second language acquisition research. Language Learning, 44: 307336.Google Scholar
Thomas, M. (2006). Research synthesis and historiography: The case of assessment in second language proficiency. In: Norris, J. M. and Ortega, L. (eds.), Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 279298.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input Processing and Grammar Instruction in Second Language Acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar