Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T05:32:53.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Inner Makeup of Definite Determiners: The Case of Germanic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2013

Dorian Roehrs
Dorian Roehrs*
Affiliation:
University of North Texas
*
Department of World Languages, Literatures, and Cultures, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #311127, Denton, Texas, 76203-5017, USA, [roehrs@unt.edu]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper studies the internal structure of definite articles and demon-stratives in twelve Germanic languages. Examining synchronic and diachronic data as well as systematic gaps, it seeks to illuminate the nature of definiteness markers and inflections, d- and -er in German d-er ‘the' and d-ies-er ‘this', with the goal of identifying some consequences for the syntax of the determiner phrase as a whole. Arguing that definite-ness markers are semantically vacuous elements, the paper proposes that articles involve an inflectional head in the syntax and demonstratives consist of an inflectional and a deictic head. Isomorphic correspondences between overt components and abstract syntactic structure may be partially or completely “masked” by postsyntactic operations.*

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , December 2013 , pp. 295 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abney, Steven. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Haegeman, Liliane, & Stavrou, Melita. 2007. Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderssen, Merete. 2005. The acquisition of compositional definiteness in Norwegian. Tromsø, Norway: University of Tromsø dissertation.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef, Bader, Markus, & Meng, Michael. 2001. Morphological underspecification meets oblique case: Syntactic and processing effects in German. Lingua 111. 465–514.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Judy B. 1997. Demonstratives and reinforcers in Romance and Germanic languages. Lingua 102. 87–113.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Judy B. 2008. English th-Forms. Essays on nominal determination. From morphology to discourse management, ed. by Høeg Müller, Henrik & Klinge, Alex, 213–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Judy B., Cowart, Wayne, & McDaniel, Dana. 1999. Bare singular effects in genitive constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 30. 493–502.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David, & Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1998. Two heads aren't always better than one. Syntax 1. 37–71.Google Scholar
Braune, Wilhelm, & Ebbinghaus, Ernst A.. 1981. Gotische Grammatik. 19th edn. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Braune, Wilhelm, & Eggers, Hans. 1987. Althochdeutsche Grammatik. 14th edn. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Brugè, Laura. 1996. Demonstrative movement in Spanish: A comparative approach. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 6. 1–61.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. Minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Martin, Roger, Micheals, David, & Uriagereka, Juan, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, & Lasnik, Howard. 1977. Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 425–504.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1994. On the evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP. Paths towards Universal Grammar. Studies in honor of Richard S. Kayne, ed. by Cinque, Guglielmo, Koster, Jan, Pollock, Jean-Yves, Rizzi, Luigi, & Zanuttini, Raffaella, 85–110. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2010. The syntax of adjectives. A comparative study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corver, Norbert. 1997. The internal structure of the Dutch extended adjectival projection. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15. 289–368.Google Scholar
Corver, Norbert. 2006. Proleptic agreement as a good design property. Studies on agreement, ed. by Costa, João & Cristina Figueiredo Silva, Maria, 47–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corver, Norbert, & van Koppen, Marjo. 2011. NP-ellipsis with adjectival remnants: A micro-comparative perspective. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29. 371–421.Google Scholar
Crisma, Paola. 2011. The emergence of the definite article in English. Sleeman & Perridon 2011, 175–192.Google Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie, & Wiltschko, Martina. 2002. Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33. 409–442.Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1993. The internal structure of noun phrases in the Scandinavian languages. A comparative study. Lund, Sweden: University of Lund dissertation.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives. Form, function, and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den. 2005. Comparative correlatives comparatively. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 497–532.Google Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den. 2006. Relators and linkers. The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Bruce. 1994. Afrikaans. König & van der Auwera 1994, 478–504.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68. 81–138.Google Scholar
Duden. 1995. Die Grammatik, vol. 4. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Embick, David, & Noyer, Rolf. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32. 555–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van. 2004. Grammaticalization as economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van. 2007. The definiteness cycle in Germanic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 19. 275–308.Google Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van. 2011. The linguistic cycle. Language change and the language faculty. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana. 1996. Is there a FocusP and a TopicP in the noun phrase structure? University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 6. 105–128.Google Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana. 1997. The categorial status of determiners. The new comparative syntax, ed. by Haegeman, Liliane, 95–123. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Green, John N. 1988. Spanish. The Romance languages, ed. by Harris, Martin & Vincent, Nigel, 79–130. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 2005. Words and structure. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1994. Introduction to government and binding theory. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1997. Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30. 425–449.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris, & Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. The view from building 20. Essays in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. by Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel K., 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris, & Marantz, Alec. 1994. Some key features of distributed morphology. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21. 275–288.Google Scholar
Harbert, Wayne. 2007. The Germanic languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, James W. 1991. The exponence of gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 22. 27–62.Google Scholar
Harris, Martin, & Vincent, Nigel. 1988. The Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. The diachronic externalization of inflection. Linguistics 31. 279–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazout, Ilan. 2004. The syntax of existential constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 35. 393–430.Google Scholar
Heck, Fabian, Müller, Gereon, & Trommler, Jochen. 2008. A phase-based approach to Scandinavian definiteness marking. Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. by Chang, Charles B. & Haynie, Hannah J., 226–233. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Ionin, Tania. 2006. This is definitely specific: Specificity and definiteness in article systems. Natural Language Semantics 14. 175–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Neil G. 2005. Yiddish. A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Neil G., Prince, Ellen F., & van der Auwera, Johan. 1994. Yiddish. König & van der Auwera 1994, 388–419.Google Scholar
Julien, Marit. 2002. Determiners and word order in Scandinavian DPs. Studia Linguistica 56. 264–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julien, Marit. 2005. Nominal phrases from a Scandinavian perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kahn, Lily. 2012. Colloquial Yiddish. The complete course for beginners. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Katzir, Roni. 2011. Morphosemantic mismatches, structural economy, and licensing. Linguistic Inquiry 42. 45–82.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 2005. On parameters and on principles of pronunciation. Organizing grammar. Studies in honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, ed. by Broekhuis, Hans, Corver, Norbert, Huybregts, Riny, Kleinhenz, Ursula, & Koster, Jan, 289–299. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S., & Pollock, Jean-Yves. 2010. Notes on French and English demonstratives. Structure preserved: Studies in syntax for Jan Koster, ed. by Zwart, Jan-Wouter & de Vries, Mark, 215–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kester, Ellen-Petra. 1996. The nature of adjectival inflection. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht University dissertation.Google Scholar
Klinge, Alex. 2008. Stating the case for þ- root and hw- root determiners. Essays on nominal determination. From morphology to discourse management, ed. by Høeg Müller, Henrik & Klinge, Alex, 233–263. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard, & van der Auwera, Johan. 1994. The Germanic languages. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. 1981. Restricting the theory of transformations: A case study. Explanations in linguistics, ed. by Hornstein, Norbert & Lightfoot, David, 152–173. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard, & Uriagereka, Juan. 1988. A course in GB syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lederer, Herbert. 1969. Reference grammar of the German language (based on Grammatik der deutschen Sprache by Dora Schulz & Heinz Griesbach). New York, NY: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Leu, Thomas. 2007. These HERE demonstratives. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 13. 141–154.Google Scholar
Leu, Thomas. 2008. The internal syntax of determiners. New York, NY: New York University dissertation.Google Scholar
Leu, Thomas. 2010. Generalized x-to-C in Germanic. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University. Available at http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001030 (March 2010).Google Scholar
Lockwood, W. B. 1955. An introduction to modern Faroese. København: Ejnar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Lohrmann, Susanne. 2010. The structure of the DP and its reflex in Scandinavian. Stuttgart, Germany: University of Stuttgart dissertation.Google Scholar
Lohrmann, Susanne. 2011. A unified structure for Scandinavian DPs. Sleeman & Perridon 2011, 111–125.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25. 609–665.Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, Rebecca. 2011. Basic Yiddish. A grammar and workbook. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H. 1991. Morphology. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 2002. What happened to English? Diachronica 19. 217–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ness, Silke van. 1994. Pennsylvania German. König & van der Auwera 1994, 420–438.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew. 2011. Marked targets versus marked triggers and impoverish-ment of the dual. Linguistic Inquiry 42. 413–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noreen, Adolf. 1970. Altnordische Grammatik I. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann, Wiehl, Peter, & Grosse, Siegfried. 1989. Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik. 23rd edn. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Perridon, Harry C. B. 1997. Is the definite article in Jutlandic a borrowing from Low German? Multilingua 16. 351–363.Google Scholar
Perridon, Harry. 2002. Dialects and written language in Old Norse II: Old Danish and Old Swedish. The Nordic languages. An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic languages, vol 1, ed. by Bandle, Oskar, Braunmüller, Kurt, Håkon Jahr, Ernst, Karker, Allan, Naumann, Hans-Peter, & Teleman, Ulf, 1018–1027. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ponelis, Fritz. 1993. The development of Afrikaans. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 1966. On the so-called pronouns in English. Nineteenth monograph on language and linguistics, ed. by Dinneen, F., 177–206. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Prokosch, Eduard. 1938. A comparative Germanic grammar. Baltimore, MD: The Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Putnam, Michael T. 2006. Those there demonstratives—demonstrative reinforcer constructions in Pennsylvania German. Leuvense Bijdragen 95. 159–177.Google Scholar
Riemsdijk, Henk van. 1998. Head movement and adjacency. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16. 633–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan. 2002. The noun phrase. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roehrs, Dorian. 2005. Pronouns are determiners after all. The function of function words and functional categories, ed. by den Dikken, Marcel & Tortora, Christina, 251–285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Roehrs, Dorian. 2006. The morpho-syntax of the Germanic noun phrase: Determiners MOVE into the determiner phrase. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University dissertation.Google Scholar
Roehrs, Dorian. 2009. Demonstratives and definite articles as nominal auxiliaries. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roehrs, Dorian. 2010. Demonstrative-reinforcer constructions. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 13. 225–268.Google Scholar
Roehrs, Dorian, & Julien, Marit. 2012. Attributive adjectives in German and Norwegian: Two types of weak endings. Paper presented at the 27th Comparative Germanic Syntax Workshop held at Yale University, May 31–June 1, 2012.Google Scholar
Santelmann, Lynn. 1993. The distribution of double determiners in Swedish: Den support in D0. Studia Linguistica 47. 154–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauerland, Uli. 1996. The late insertion of Germanic inflection. Unpublished manuscript, MIT. Available at http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/dm/sauerland-lateinsertion.pdf (August 2008).Google Scholar
Schaechter, Mordkhe. 2003. Yiddish II. An intermediate and advanced textbook. 4th edn. New York, NY: Yiddish Language Resource Center, League for Yiddish, Inc.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 1999. La flexion de l'adjectif en allemand: La morphologie de haut en bas. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 28. 115–132. Available at: http://rlv.revues.org/document1216.html.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Wilhelm, Langner, Helmut, & Richard Wolf, Norbert. 2000. Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. 8th edn. Stuttgart: S. Hirzel Verlag.Google Scholar
Schoorlemmer, Erik. 2009. Agreement, dominance and doubling. The morphosyntax of DP. Leiden, The Netherlands: University of Leiden dissertation.Google Scholar
Schoorlemmer, Erik. 2012. Definiteness marking in Germanic: Morphological variations on the same syntactic theme. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 15. 107–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SigurÐsson, Halldór Ármann. 2006. The Icelandic noun phrase: Central traits. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 121. 193–236.Google Scholar
Sleeman, Petra, & Perridon, Harry (eds.). 2011. The noun phrase in Romance and Germanic: Structure, variation, and change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 1991. Morphological theory. An introduction to word structure in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, Donald. 2001. The Great Gender Shift and the attrition of neuter nouns in West Germanic: The example of German. New insights in Germanic II, ed. by Rauch, Irmengard & Carr, Gerald F., 201–224. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Swart, Henriëtte de, Winter, Yoad, & Zwarts, Joost. 2007. Bare nominals and reference to capacities. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25. 195–222.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1994. Icelandic. König & van der Auwera 1994, 142–189.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander. 2004. Rolling up the Scandinavian noun phrase. Paper presented at the 27th GLOW Colloquium at Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, April 19–21, 2004.Google Scholar
Vater, Heinz. 1984. Determinantien und Quantoren im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 3. 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, Nigel. 1988. Latin. The Romance languages, ed. by Harris, Martin & Vincent, Nigel, 26–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel. 1997. The emergence of the D-system in Romance. Parameters of morphosyntactic change, ed. by van Kemenade, Ans & Vincent, Nigel, 149–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vries, Jan de. 1962. Altnordisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. 2nd edn. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1999. College Yiddish. 6th edn. New York, NY: YIVO Institute for Jewish Research.Google Scholar
Wiener, Leo. 1893. On the Judaeo-German spoken by the Russian Jews. The American Journal of Philology 14. 41–67.Google Scholar
Wiese, Richard. 1988. The proper treatment of inflection in the German article system. Wiener Linguistische Gazette, Beiheft [Supplement] 7. 32–34.Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina. 1998. On the syntax and semantics of (relative) pronouns and determiners. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2. 143–181.Google Scholar
Zucker, Sheva. 1994. Yiddish. An introduction to the language, literature, and culture, vol. 1. New York, NY: The Workmen's Circle/Arbeter Ring.Google Scholar