Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T07:48:07.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Middle Verbs in Icelandic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Madelyn Kissock
Madelyn Kissock
Affiliation:
Harvard UniversityDepartment of Linguistics77 Dunster StreetCambridge, MA 02138 [kissock@fas.harvard.edu]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper presents an account of st-(middle) verbs in Icelandic that treats -st as the head of a functional phrase-object agreement (AgrO)- and argues that, consequently, st-formation is a syntactic rather than a lexical process. Supporting evidence includes the fact that -st is a clitic rather than an inflectional or derivational element attached to the verb. This analysis has the advantage that st-verbs, which on the surface appear disparate in their interpretation (e.g., reflexive vs. passive), can be unified under a single syntactic operation. The differences in interpretation fall out from argument structure properties of individual verbs. A consistent mapping between morphology and syntax is obtained.*

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , Spring 1997 , pp. 1 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Åfarli, Tor A. 1992. The syntax of Norwegian passive constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1990. The grammar of Icelandic verbs in -st. In Maling and Zaenen (eds.), 235–73.Google Scholar
Andrews, A. D. 1971. Case agreement of predicate modifiers in Ancient Greek. Linguistic Inquiry 2.127–51.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1985. The Mirror Principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16.373–415.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1992. Why unaccusative verbs can't dative shift. NELS 23.33–97.Google Scholar
Belletti, A. and Rizzi, L.. 1988. Psych-verbs and theta-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6.291–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bures, Anton. 1992. Re-cycling expletive (and other) sentences. Unpublished ms., MIT.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. by Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel J., 1–51. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris and Thráinsson, H.. 1993. Object shift in double object constructions and the theory of case. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 19.131–74.Google Scholar
du Plessis, J. A. and Visser, M.. 1992. Xhosa syntax. Pretoria: Via Afrika.Google Scholar
Fagan, Sarah. 1991. The Unaccusative Hypothesis and a reflexive construction in German and Dutch. Stœfcrœft: Studies in Germanic linguistics, ed. by Antonsen, Elmer H. and Hock, Hans Henrich, 39–54. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fagan, Sarah. 1992. The syntax and semantics of middle constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, E. V. 1927. An introduction to Old Norse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel J.. 1987. A view from the middle. (MIT lexicon working papers, 10). Cambridge, MA: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.Google Scholar
Hale, Mark and Reiss, Charles. 1996. The Subset Principle and acquisition of the phonological inventory. Paper presented at the Seventh Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America,Ohio State University,May 10–12, 1996.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 1986. Word order and syntactic features in the Scandinavian languages and English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders and Platzack, Christer. 1995. The role of inflection in Scandinavian syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, Dianne. 1992. Checking theory and nominative case in Icelandic. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 1.175–96.Google Scholar
Jonas, Dianne and Bobaljik, Jonathan D.. 1993. Specs for subjects: The role of TP in Icelandic. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 19.59–98.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1989. Facets of past participle agreement in Romance. Dialect variation in the theory of grammar, ed. by Beninca, P., 85–103. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissock, Madelyn. 1991. Sanskrit middle verbs. To appear in Agreement in South Asian Languages. Papers from the 20th Annual Conference on South Asia—Symposium on Agreement in South Asian Languages, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 11 1–2, 1991, ed. by M. Verma.Google Scholar
Kissock, Madelyn. 1995. Reflexive-middle constructions and verb raising in Telugu. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Klaiman, M. H. 1991. Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan. 1991. Of nominative and dative: The Icelandic middle. To appear in Íslenskt mál.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.). 1990. Modern Icelandic syntax. (Syntax and semantics, 24.) San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1991. Case and licensing. Proceedings of the 8th Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, ed. by Westphal, G., Ao, B., and Chaie, H.-R., 234–53. Baltimore: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1995. The minimalist program. Government and binding theory and the minimalist program, ed. by Webelhuth, G., 349–82. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Noreen, Adolf. 1923. Altnordische Grammatik. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Ottósson, Kjartan. 1989. The anticausative middle and other voices of Icelandic. Unpublished ms., University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
Ottósson, Kjartan. 1992. The Icelandic middle voice. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1993. Coordination, ATB-extractions, and the identification of pro. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 3.153–80.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór. 1992. Verbal syntax and case in Icelandic. Reykjavík: University of Iceland.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1993. On the structure of infinitival complements. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 3.181–213.Google Scholar
Valfells, Sigriður. 1970. Middle voice in Icelandic. The Nordic languages and modern linguistics, ed. by Benediktsson, H., 1.551–71. Reykjavík: Vísindafélag Íslendinga.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie and Maling, Joan. 1990. Unaccusative, passive and quirky case. In Maling, and Zaenen, (eds.), 137–52.Google Scholar