No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Noun Modifier Inflection in German: A Morphological System in Flux
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2008
Abstract
Traditionally, noun modifiers in German fall into two classes, the so-called der- and ein-words, and descriptive or attributive adjectives. In the noun phrase, members of these word classes are inflected by the addition of one or another of two sets of endings, i.e., the primary, strong, or pronominal endings, or the secondary, weak, or nominal endings, in highly predictable combinations. In the data collected by Ljungerud (1955), however, sequences of endings in noun phrases containing nine modifiers occur with noticeable departures from the norm, i.e., folgend, sämtlich, ander-, einig-, viel-, manch-, welch-, irgendwelch-, and solch-. It is concluded that the anomalous sequences of endings in phrases containing these modifers are motivated by the growing association of certain sequences of endings with the feature +/-Generality as a component of the meaning of the noun phrase as a whole.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 1990
References
WORKS CITED
Berger, Dieter et al. , eds. 1972. Duden: Zweifelsfälle der deutschen Sprache. 2nd ed. Duden, Bd. 9. Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, Hennig. 1971. Die deutsche Sprache: Gestalt und Leistung. 2nd ed. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar
Curme, George O.. 1952. A grammar of the German language. 2nd ed. New York: Frederick Ungar.Google Scholar
Darski, J. 1979. “Die Adjektivdeklination im Deutschen.” Sprachwissenschaft 4:190–205.Google Scholar
Drosdowski, Günther et al. , eds. 1984. Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. 4th ed. Der Duden in 10 Bänden, Bd. 4. Mannheim/Wien/Zürich: Bibliographisches Institut/Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Erben, Johannes. 1972. Deutsche Grammatik: Ein Abriβ, 11th ed.München: Max Hueber Verlag.Google Scholar
Fichtner, Edward G. 1979. English and German syntax: A contrastive analysis on generative-tagmemic principles. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
Fichtner, Edward G. 1982. “Finite clause negation in English and German.” In: The contrastive grammar of English and German, eds. Lohnes, Walter F. W. and Hopkins, Edwin A.. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma Publishers. Pp. 180–96.Google Scholar
Geach, Peter Thomas. 1980. Reference and generality: An examination of some medieval and modern theories. 3rd ed. Contemporary philosophy series. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Heidolph, Karl Erich et al. , eds. 1981. Grundzüge einer deutschen Grammatik. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hotzenköcherle, Rudolf. 1968. “Gegenwartsprobleme im deutschen Adjektivsystem.” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 69, 1:1–28.Google Scholar
Lederer, Herbert. 1969. Reference grammar of the German language. New York: Scribner's. (Based on Schulz-Griesbach, Grammatik der deutschen Sprache.)Google Scholar
Ljungerud, Ivar. 1955. Zur Nominalflexion in der deutschen Literatursprache nach 1900. Lunder germanistische Forschungen, 31. Lund: Gleerup; Kopenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Orr, Robert. 1982–1983. “The twofold adjective declension in Germanic and Slavic (with some reference to Baltic): A contrastive/comparative analysis.” Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 96, 1:104–18.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. Alan & Linder, Beth. 1984. “The inflection of adjectives after indefinites in written and spoken German.” Studies in descriptive German grammar. Ed. Pfeffer, J. Alan. Studies in descriptive linguistics, Vol. 12. Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag. Pp. 135–62.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Winter, Werner. 1969. “Analogischer Sprachwandel und semantische Struktur.” Folia linguistica 3:29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar