Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T08:20:00.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The syntax of negation. By Liliane Haegeman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. Pp. xv, 335. Hardcover. $69.95.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Wim Klooster
Affiliation:
University of AmsterdamNederlandse TaalkundeSpuistraat134 1012 VB AmsterdamThe Netherlands [wim.klooster@let.uva.nl]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brody, Michael. 1990. Some remarks on the focus field in Hungarian. University College London Working Papers in Linguistics, 201–25.Google Scholar
Brody, Michael. 1993. Lexico-logical form—a radically minimalist theory. Unpublished ms.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. 1985. Affectivity, modality and complement selection. Unpublished ms.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane and Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1991. Negative heads and the Neg Criterion. The Linguistic Review 8.233–52.Google Scholar
Klima, Edward S. 1964. Negation in English. The structure of language, ed. by Fodor, Jerry A. and Katz, Jerold J., 246323. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Laka, Mugarza, Miren, Itziar. 1990. Negation in syntax: On the nature of functional categories and projections. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. 1974. Analyses of negation in English. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
May, Robert. 1985. Logical form: Its structure and derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar