Introduction

Satellite images reveal a region in the western part of the Greenland ice sheet that is darker than the surrounding ice (e.g. Reference Oerlemans and VugtsOerlemans and Vugts, 1993;Reference Van de Wal and OerlemansVan de Wal and Oerlemans, 1994) (Fig. 1). Previous studies suggested that accumulation of meltwater at the ice surface caused this darkening, as a result of slow internal drainage of water due to cold ice and low supraglacial drainage caused by a low surface slope (e.g. Reference Knap and OerlemansKnap and Oerlemans, 1996; Reference GreuellGreuell, 2000). However, as the dark region compared with the brighter reference ice shows a spectral pattern typical of ice containing more debris, higher concentrations of dust in the ice are a more plausible cause for the surface darkening (Reference Wientjes and OerlemansWientjes and Oerlemans, 2010). As the dark region is found every summer in the same position at some distance from the margin, it seems not only to be caused by recent windblown material from the tundra or by recent dry and wet deposition. Another possible mechanism via which the dust could reach the dark region is glacial transport, after settling higher on the ice sheet in the accumulation zone (Fig. 2). Wavy patterns in the dark region observed on Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) images confirm the outcropping of stratified ice layers in the dark region (Reference Wientjes and OerlemansWientjes and Oerlemans, 2010). Reference Wientjes, Van de Wal, Reichart, Sluijs and OerlemansWientjes and others (2011) investigated surface dust from the dark region as well as from the reference ice and observed that it mainly has the same composition, mostly mineral dust and microbes. They also found strong indications that this dust has a local origin, probably the West Greenland tundra.

Fig. 1. Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) image from 9 August 2007, band 2 (841–876 nm), showing the dark region in the melt zone of the Greenland ice sheet (adapted from Reference Wientjes and OerlemansWientjes and Oerlemans, 2010). S: Sukkertoppen Iskappe; K: Kangerlussuaq; P: Paakitsoq area. S1 and S3 represent sampling locations from the reference ice, and S7 and S8 sampling locations from the dark region. Geographical coordinates are shown along the axes.

Fig. 2. Schematic overview of possible mechanisms by which dust can reach the ablation zone of an ice sheet (modified after Reference Wientjes, Van de Wal, Reichart, Sluijs and OerlemansWientjes and others, 2011). The red arrows indicate recent dry or wet deposition from the atmosphere and recent wind-blown material from the nearby tundra, whereas the blue arrows represent particle trajectories in the ice. In both cases, the material can originally have the same source, but the age will be different. ELA indicates the equilibrium-line altitude, and the black line at the surface indicates the dark region.

Owing to the flow pattern in an ice sheet, a horizontal surface ice profile in the ablation zone perpendicular to the margin corresponds with a vertical ice core in the accumulation zone and therefore represents a timeline (e.g. Reference Reeh, Thomsen and ClausenReeh and others, 1987). This implies that the closer to the margin, the older the ice is. For this reason we assume that the sharp transition between the dark region and the brighter ice represents an isochrone and that higher amounts of dust originate from a period when more material settled on the ice (e.g. colder periods when more dust reached the ice sheet due to drier and windier conditions). However, it is not very likely that the dark region originates from a glacial, because the dark region is situated several kilometres to tens of kilometres from the margin. This is supported by observations near Paakitsoq, where Pleistocene ice was observed only very close to the margin (Reference Reeh, Oerter and ThomsenReeh and others, 2002;Reference Petrenko, Severinghaus, Brook, Reeh and SchaeferPetrenko and others, 2006).

In order to find out in which period the dust was deposited on the ice sheet, ¹⁴C dating of water-insoluble carbonaceous particles in the ice seems a suitable method (e.g. Reference JenkJenk and others, 2006, Reference Jenk2007). Promising results have been obtained even for low carbon concentrations (5100 mg C) (Reference JenkJenk and others, 2009), although Reference SiglSigl and others (2009) claim that the application of this method is of limited use for polar ice due to the very low concentrations of carbonaceous particles. However, as the dark region contains high amounts of dust, we expected that high enough amounts of carbonaceous particles have been deposited as well to enable application of the ¹⁴C dating technique. Part of the methodology involves separating the total carbonaceous matter in organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC). The OC fraction contains low to medium molecular weight compounds, which are emitted directly to the atmosphere or generated from gaseous precursors as secondary organic aerosol (SOA). Since the combustion of fossils fuels was low in pre-industrial times, OC was predominantly emitted from vegetation (Reference JenkJenk and others, 2006), implying that this biogenic carbon has the ¹⁴C/¹²C ratio of the living biosphere at the time of photosynthesis. The EC fraction consists of highly polymerized hydrocarbons and is separated from OC by its thermal properties. In principle it represents the same fractions as black carbon (BC). It is formed through incomplete combustion processes from natural biomass burning or more recently from anthropogenic sources. Because the source material for EC could be formed some time before burning, it can lead to radiocarbon ages that are older than their time of emission into the atmosphere (referred to as the inbuilt age). EC could therefore have a different ¹⁴C/¹²C ratio than the ¹⁴C/¹²C ratio of OC at the time of combustion. These different ages can also occur for material on the Greenland ice sheet. For example, if the carbonaceous material on the ice originates from wood fires (e.g. Reference Chylek, Johnson, Damiano, Taylor and ClementChylek and others, 1995), EC can have slightly older ages than OC. To account for these types of effects, we distinguish between OC and EC and both fractions were treated separately.

The main goals of this paper are to show evidence for the presence of old dust in the dark region, to reveal the period (Late Holocene) in which this old dust settled on the ice sheet and to discuss if high concentrations of carbonaceous material might contribute to the presence of the dark region. We describe the OC and EC concentrations from ice collected in the dark region as well as from reference ice outside the dark region and compare them with values in the literature. In contrast to our expectation, most samples have low carbon concentrations. We present the radiocarbon ages as far as they could be determined given these low carbon concentrations. Finally, we present conclusions from both the concentrations and the dates.

Ice Samples

The ice cores from the dark region were sampled with a simple Polar Ice Coring Office (PICO) drill during two different field campaigns (for the exact locations and sample characteristics, see Fig. 1 ;Table 1). In April 2008 three ice cores were drilled, consisting of different pieces. The longest ice core of ~2 m was retrieved at Site 7. This core was divided into two samples, S7-1 and S7-2. Two smaller ice cores of ~0.8 m were drilled at Site 8. These were treated as separate samples S8-1 and S8-2. The upper part of sample S8-2, a piece of ~15 cm, contained cracks and holes (Fig. 3) and thus was not used for further analyses as such holes were in contact with the present atmosphere, potentially leading to a ¹⁴C age not representative of the ice sample. In September 2009 we drilled three small cores of ~0.2-0.3 m at Site 8, which were treated as one sample (S8-3). In addition we drilled six cores each ~0.25-0.35 m and one of ~0.6 m at Site 7. The cores were drilled several metres apart from each other. Although these cores appeared normal in the field, during sample preparation we discovered very small melt holes in the ice which contained dark material at the bottom (Fig. 3). These holes were most likely formed by surface material that was melted into the ice, a phenomenon known as cryoconite holes. They have diameters of a few millimetres and depths between 5 and >20cm for the different cores. The holes have the same depth (within 1 cm) for each single core. This indicates that the surface debris melts in the ice until a certain depth is reached. Such an equilibrium depth for cryoconite holes has been observed before (e.g. Reference GribbonGribbon, 1979). Because the holes seemed to be in contact with the present atmosphere and because the material at the bottom was likely to be modern, they could influence the radiocarbon dating of the dust. We therefore decided not to use the pieces affected by the cryoconite holes and cut these pieces off directly below the melt holes. The remaining parts were treated as one large sample, S7-3. Hence, samples S8-1, S8-3 and S7-1 contained ice from directly below the surface, in contrast to the other three samples (S7-2, S7-3 and S8-2).

Fig. 3. (a, b) The uppermost piece of sample S8-2, with holes and cracks in the ice. (c) One of the cores at S7-3, with melt holes and debris at ~10cm depth.

Table 1. Overview of the sample characteristics. Numbers of cores and final pieces as well as the net weight forming a sample that was used for the analyses are given

Four reference samples were taken from several pieces of two deeper ice cores (S1 and S3) that were drilled in 1995 in brighter ice located closer to the ice-sheet margin than the dark region. Samples S1-1 and S1-2 were obtained from one core at Site 1 and samples S3-1 and S3-2 from one core at Site 3. These samples contained ice from a depth of several metres.

Method

The ice cores were prepared following the method described by Reference JenkJenk and others (2007). During preparation the outer parts of the ice cores (including the upper centimetres of the surface) were removed and several cracks in the cores were cut out to avoid possible contamination. In the next step they were rinsed with ultrapure water (Milli-Q, 18Mficm). After melt, the samples were filtered using freshly preheated quartz fibre filters (Pallflex Tissuquartz, 2500QAO-UP). Afterwards, the filters were acidified with 50 pi of 0.2 M HCl to remove carbonates. Samples were prepared in laminar flow boxes and all materials used were made of quartz, glass, stainless steel or Teflon.

For the separation of OC and EC, the THEODORE (two- step heating system for the EC/OC determination of radiocarbon in the environment) system was used, as described by Reference SzidatSzidat and others (2004). Hereby, the samples were combusted under a stream of oxygen at 340°C for 10min (for OC) and at 650°C for 12 min (for EC). The CO₂ formed during combustion was cryogenically trapped and sealed in glass ampoules. OC and EC concentrations were determined by manometry.

The final ¹⁴C analyses were performed using a 200kV compact radiocarbon accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) system (Reference Synal, Stocker and SuterSynal and others, 2007) with a gas ion source (Ruff and others, 2007) at ETH Zurich, Switzerland. This system, the Mini Radiocarbon Dating System (MICADAS), allows for direct measurement of the gaseous samples. The results were expressed as f _M (fraction of modern carbon), which is 1 for modern carbon and 0 for fossil carbon. To determine possible contamination during the different steps of the sample processing, procedural blanks were analysed. Therefore artificial ice blocks of frozen ultrapure water were treated and measured in the same way as real ice samples. For details of the procedural blank used in this study see Reference SiglSigl and others (2009). The correction finally applied to the AMS results due to this procedural blank is

(1)

where f_M denotes the ¹⁴C/¹²C ratio observed relative to the ratio of the year 1950, f_{M initial} the value before correction for the procedural blank and m_c the carbon mass separated for AMS analysis.

The obtained ¹⁴C ages were calibrated using the OxCalv4.1.7 software (2010 update of Reference Bronk RamseyBronk Ramsey, 2001) with the IntCal09 calibration curve (Reference ReimerReimer and others, 2009), with the exception of over-modern values (f_M>1) which were calibrated using the Bomb04NH1curve (Reference Hua and BarbettiHua and Barbetti, 2004).

Carbon Concentrations

OC And EC Measurements

The OC and EC concentrations of the different samples are shown in Table 2. Samples S8-1, S8-3, S7-1, S1-1 and S1-2 have high OC concentrations relative to the other samples. The samples from the dark region with high OC concentrations, S8-1, S8-3 and S7-1, contain ice from directly below the surface. The other samples from the dark region, S8-2, S7-2 and S7-3, have much lower OC concentrations, indicating that the high OC concentrations are not part of the outcropping ice but originate from the surface. Microorganisms that live on the ice have likely formed the high amounts of OC (e.g. Reference Stibal, Lis, Lawson, Mak, Wadham and AnesioStibal and others, 2010). This organic debris must have penetrated into the ice by melting from the surface, although the parts of the samples with visible melt holes were removed. The two samples from Site 7 without high OC concentrations, S7-2 and S7-3, show OC concentrations that are similar to each other, although S7-3 consists of different smaller ice cores cut off directly below the visible melt holes, whereas S7-2 is the lowermost part of one ice core at ~90cm depth. This indicates that below the melt holes, the concentration of OC is the same, independent of depth. The same applies to the concentrations of EC. Therefore, the carbonaceous particles below the melt holes seem to be all outcropping and hence transported through the ice sheet.

Table 2. Particulate OC and EC concentrations in the ice samples

Both reference samples that contain high OC concentrations are from Site 1. The filtering of these two samples indicated fine mud-like material in the meltwater. In addition, these samples were taken from several metres below the surface but contain small stone-like particles. This indicates that they probably contain moraine or bedrock entrained debris, which is plausible as Site 1 is located very near the ice margin on an outlet glacier. Because the ice sheet was smaller in the past (e.g. Reference Van Tatenhove, Van der Meer and KosterVan Tatenhove and others, 1996), it is reasonable to assume that the bedrock close to the present margin was covered with vegetation and therefore still contains organic material. Basally entrained material in these samples explains why the OC concentration is significantly higher than for the other samples taken at some depth below the surface.

The EC concentrations of the samples containing surface material are slightly higher relative to the other samples, probably due to the fact that together with the organic debris, EC particles from the surface melted into the ice. If we compare the different samples from the dark region without surface material, we observe that S8-2 has slightly higher OC and EC concentrations than S7-2 and S7-3. A possible explanation is that the outcropping ice at Site 8 has higher impurity concentrations; however, with only one sample from Site 8 at some depth, it is hard to draw firm conclusions.

In order to compare the amounts of carbonaceous particles in the outcropping ice between the dark region and the reference ice, we use the reference samples from Site 3 and samples S7-2, S7-3 and S8-2 from the dark region. The other samples seem to contain either material melted from the surface or basally entrained material. Figure 4 shows OC and EC concentrations averaged for the samples from Site 7 (S7-2 and S7-3) and Site 3 (S3-1 and S3-2). Although clearly based on a limited number of values, Figure 4 shows that the concentrations of glacially transported particles are higher in the dark region relative to the reference ice. We excluded S8-2 from this figure, as it was taken from another location and has different carbon concentrations. However, a figure including S8-2 shows quantitatively the same results.

Fig. 4. Averaged OC and EC concentrations from two samples from the dark region (S7) and from two samples of the reference ice (S3). Error bars represent one standard deviation.

In summary, we conclude that samples from directly below the surface contain high amounts of mostly OC, which seems to melt down from the surface. For the samples taken at some depth below the surface, the carbonaceous particles are transported through the ice sheet. Samples from Site 1 probably contain basally entrained material. If we compare the samples from different locations, we observe that the concentration of glacially transported carbonaceous particles is larger in the dark region than in the reference ice.

Comparing OC and EC concentrations with ice-core and snow samples

Based on the hypothesis of high amounts of outcropping dust in the dark region (Reference Wientjes and OerlemansWientjes and Oerlemans, 2010), we expected that the dark region also contains high amounts of carbonaceous particles. Although the measurements reveal that carbon concentrations in this region are significantly higher than in the surrounding reference ice, our initial assumption of high carbon concentrations turned out to be incorrect. To interpret these results in the context of general carbonaceous particle deposition on the Greenland ice sheet, we compare our findings with values from other locations reported in the literature.

The OC concentrations of our samples seem to be generally low compared with reported values from the Greenland ice sheet, except for the samples from directly below the surface (S8-1, S8-3, S7-1). Reference Hagler, Bergin, Smith, Dibb, Anderson and SteigHagler and others (2007) presented water-insoluble particulate OC concentrations of 11.9 μg kg^-1 in fresh snow and 3.1-8.4 μgkg^-1 in snow from previous years at Summit. Differences in the analytical method and, more likely, a modern and anthropogenic character of this OC might contribute to the differences between these values and the concentration of our samples. Another possibility for these different concentrations could be post-depositional processes (Reference Hagler, Bergin, Smith, Dibb, Anderson and SteigHagler and others, 2007). Reference JenkJenk (2006) observed OC concentrations in the Paakitsoq area of 3.5 μgkg^-1 for ice from 11.5 ka bp (Younger Dryas transition), 3.9 μg kg^-1 for ice from 12.6 ka BP (Younger Dryas) and 4.7 μgkg^-1 for ice from 14.7 ka BP (Older Dryas). These samples are all from glacial periods in which dryer and windier conditions accounted for high amounts of particles deposited on the ice sheet. This is confirmed by the fact that some of the samples were taken from visible dirt bands in the ice. Reference SiglSigl and others (2009) presented OC concentrations from eight Greenland Ice Core Project (GRIP) ice-core samples from different time intervals which together cover most of the Holocene. Two of these samples have very high OC concentrations of 20 and 43 μgkg^-1, whereas the other six have concentrations between 2.1 and 7.1 μgkg^-1 (average 3.5 μgkg^-1). The OC concentration of sample S8-2 in this study has a comparable concentration of 3.9μgkg^-1. However, the OC concentrations of the other samples that were taken at some depth (S7-2, S7-3, S3-1 and S3-2) are clearly lower. Both our samples and the samples from Reference SiglSigl and others (2009) are from the Holocene age and were analysed using the same method. Therefore we assume that the differences are due to the different locations on the ice sheet from which the respective ice originated, as GRIP is located at Summit (Fig. 1). As the exact processes leading to OC deposition on the Greenland ice sheet are not fully understood, explanations for these differences can only be speculative. Different sources (terrestrial vegetated areas as well as oceans), atmospheric transport routes and precipitation patterns and amounts possibly contributed to different deposition rates. Because particulate OC can be either emitted directly to the atmosphere or formed from gaseous precursors, varying chemical processes induced by different conditions might also play a role.

EC is assumed to be chemically inert, allowing for a better comparison. The EC concentrations in the samples in this study are generally in the same range as other values observed for the Greenland ice sheet (Table 3). In the Paakitsoq area, EC concentrations of 4.1 and 5.2_gkg^-1 were reported for the Younger and Older Dryas, respectively, using the same method as used here (Reference JenkJenk, 2006). These concentrations are slightly higher than in the samples in this study, again probably because the samples from Reference JenkJenk (2006), unlike the samples in this study, are from glacial periods with well-known high dust deposition on the Greenland ice sheet. Reference ChylekChylek and others (1987) presented concentrations of 1.1 and 2.5 μgL^-1 for two ice samples with ages of ~6 and ~4 ka, respectively, and 2.1 and 2.6μgL^-1 for recent snow from Camp Century. GISP2 ice-core samples (near Summit) were investigated by Reference Chylek, Johnson, Damiano, Taylor and ClementChylek and others (1995), who reported a concentration of 2.1 μgkg^-1 in samples from AD320-330, a period with frequent extensive forest fires. This value reduces to 1.7μgkg^-1 when two large forest fires are left out of the analyses. The same authors presented a value of 2.0μgkg^-1 for recent snow, also at GISP2. Reference Chylek, Johnson and WuChylek and others (1992) reported an average of 1.53 μgkg^-1 from 22 ice-core samples from Dye-3, varying from 0.1 to 3.2 μgkg^-1, covering the period 3380-100 BP. Two slightly higher values of 4.3 and 8.5 μgkg^-1 were observed near Dye-3 for samples from a snow pit collected by Reference Clarke and NooneClarke and Noone (1985), but investigation of seven other samples from this location revealed maximum EC concentrations between 1.1 and 6.2 μgkg^-1. The averaged maximum value for all nine samples is 4.2 μgkg^-1, but real EC concentrations are probably lower. Recent snow from Summit revealed concentrations of 0.16-1.21 μgkg^-1 (Reference Hagler, Bergin, Smith, Dibb, Anderson and SteigHagler and others, 2007). Higher concentrations of 4.2-30.1 μgkg^-1 were observed for the same location by Reference Slater, Currie, Dibb and BennerSlater and others (2002), but they explained that these higher values might be a result of the measurement method used. As the EC concentrations in our samples are not specifically high, the dark region does not seem to be caused by periods with high deposition of EC particles, as in extreme forest fires.

Table 3. Elemental carbon concentrations from the Greenland ice sheet

Anthropogenic sources could also account for higher amounts of EC deposition on the ice sheet, although the findings in the literature discussed above show little difference between concentrations from pre-industrial ice and modern snow. Reference McConnellMcConnell and others (2007) presented a continuous record of BC concentrations from 1788 to 2002 at D4, a location in the accumulation zone of the Greenland ice sheet (71.4° N, 44.0° W). This record shows that BC concentrations, although highly variable in time, increased strongly after 1850 as a result of industrial emissions, followed by lower values after about 1950. Reference McConnellMcConnell and others (2007) reported an average pre-industrial BC concentration of 1.7 mgkg^-1, an average concentration of 4.0 μgkg^-1 for 1851-1951 and an average concentration of 2.3 μgkg^-1 for 1952-2002 (Table 3). These findings are in general agreement with those in the literature discussed above. Investigations by Reference McConnellMcConnell and others (2007) at D5 (68.5° N, 42.9° W), a location in the accumulation zone eastward of the dark region, show similar changes in BC. As the concentrations of glacially transported carbonaceous particles in the samples in this study agree most favourably with the pre-industrial values observed by Reference McConnellMcConnell and others (2007), we conclude that our samples are not anthropogenic. This is in agreement with the distance of tens of kilometres from Sites 7 and 8 to the equilibrium line, as material in the outcropping ice from these Site cannot have travelled such long distances through the ice sheet from the industrial revolution until now.

Based on these comparisons we conclude that the concentrations of outcropping OC in our samples are relatively low compared with findings in the literature, for different reasons, whereas the outcropping EC concentrations agree well with other values from the Greenland ice sheet. Therefore, we can exclude extensive deposition of carbonaceous particles in the accumulation zone as a cause for the dark region.

Radiocarbon Dating

Because the amount of carbonaceous particles in most of the ice samples is very low, the measurement uncertainty becomes high and therefore the obtained ages cover relatively wide intervals. Table 4 presents an overview of the results, including the measurement errors. Owing to the low carbon concentrations, only a limited number of samples could be dated and therefore the results should be considered as first evidence.

Table 4. Radiocarbon ages of carbonaceous particles from West Greenland. Absolute uncertainties indicate the 1σrange. Calibrated ages are given within the 2_range. Calibrated ages are defined as modern where they are younger than AD 1950

The OC from the samples containing ice directly below the surface is modern. This is in agreement with the presence of microorganisms near the ice surface, as discussed in the previous section. The EC from S8-1 seems to be slightly older than the modern ages of the OC fraction. As it is likely that this material also originated from the surface, this might be due to the inbuilt age of the radiocarbon age of the EC (Reference GavinGavin, 2001) or partly because the measurement error is larger. The ages of the OC and EC of S8-2, a sample at some depth below the surface, indicate that this sample is not modern. This confirms our hypothesis that old material is outcropping in this area. The EC appears to be younger than the OC for S8-2, contrary to the common idea that EC is either the same age as OC or is older due to the inbuilt age (e.g. Reference SiglSigl and others, 2009). Although the presence of peaty particles might influence the age of the OC, this effect should be limited because their amounts will be small and wind-blown material will originate from upper soil layers. As the calibrated periods for each fraction in this sample partly overlap, it is likely that both EC and OC have the same age within their uncertainties. This results in an age between 2000 and 660 bp, in the Late Holocene.

During the Holocene, eolian activity in the ice-free areas of West Greenland has been variable. Reference Willemse, Koster, Hoogakker and Van TatenhoveWillemse and others (2003) reported that, in the Kangerlussuaq tundra, regional silts were deposited continuously since 4750 BPand the bulk of eolian sands before 3400 bp and after 550 bp, but they also found indications for extreme phases of eolian activity prior to 3500 BP, around 3250 and 2800 BP and between 1600 and 520 bp. This last period of increased eolian activity coincides with the age we reconstructed for the glacially transported material in sample S8-2 (2000-660 BP). Reference Eisner, Tornqvist, Koster, Bennike and Van LeeuwenEisner and others (1995) investigated a sediment record from a lake in the Kangerlussuaq region and reported continuous eolian sand and silt depositions since 5000 bp, with a significant increase since ~1000¹⁴C bp (provided without error). This increase is likely due to a higher sediment supply caused by a larger ice-free area. Note that the ¹⁴C ages of the OC and EC in our sample S8-2 are 1720 ± 560 BP and 970 ± 530 BP, respectively, which coincides with the period presented by Reference Eisner, Tornqvist, Koster, Bennike and Van LeeuwenEisner and others (1995). Although not proven, we assume that in periods when the regional situation and climate conditions allow high eolian activity in the tundra, higher fluxes of eolian dust reach the ice sheet.

The OC from the reference sample S1-1 is older than the outcropping material from Site 8. This is to be expected as Site 1 is located closer to the margin and the ice at this site is therefore older. However, in the previous section we concluded that organic material in this sample was likely picked up from the bedrock. In that case, not only glacially transported material from the accumulation zone, but also basally entrained organic debris has been dated. The age observed for this sample agrees well with the period when the bedrock was exposed and vegetation could have grown there. For example, Reference Van Tatenhove, Van der Meer and KosterVan Tatenhove and others (1996) reported circumstantial evidence that the ice-sheet margin retreated tens of kilometres behind its present position during the Holocene climatic optimum in this area. Reference Weidick, Oerter, Reeh, Thomsen and ThoringWeidick and others (1990) state that the tundra near Jakobshavn Isbræ was more ice-free than at present, at least in the period 2700-4700 BP. As our samples are from an area close to this region, it is likely that these conclusions also hold for our sampling sites. The age for our Site 1 sample, 27414080 bp, agrees well with these findings.

In summary, we can distinguish between modern carbon introduced by melting from the surface ice in the upper parts of our cores and older glacially transported material in samples taken at some depth. The observed radiocarbon age for probably vegetated bedrock material agrees well with the period of exposed tundra for this site. In addition, the radiocarbon ages for the outcropping material agree well with findings in the literature for high eolian activity. Therefore, we may conclude that the radiocarbon ages confirm our assumption of a Holocene age for the original deposition of the outcropping material in the dark region, during periods when higher amounts of local dust were available.

Conclusions

Although we have a limited number of samples, and carbon concentrations in the outcropping ice are lower than expected, we can draw some important conclusions. Samples of ice from directly below the surface show high concentrations of modern OC. This is probably caused by the presence of microbes on the ice surface. Modern material melted into the ice to an equilibrium depth, even though melt holes are not always visible. Ice beneath this equilibrium depth contains low concentrations of carbonaceous particles. These concentrations are independent of depth, indicating that the material is transported through the ice. This is confirmed by the only sample taken at some depth that could be dated, which revealed that the carbon in this sample is not modern and settled on the ice sheet during the Late Holocene.

The dust from our reference ice at Site 1, a site close to the margin, seems to contain basally entrained material. Therefore, the age of the OC (4080-2741 bp) does not represent the date of uptake by the ice, but the time of growth of vegetation on the bedrock. The bedrock was ice- free at least during the period 4700-2700 bp (Reference Weidick, Oerter, Reeh, Thomsen and ThoringWeidick and others, 1990). The radiocarbon age of this sample coincides with this period when the bedrock was likely exposed and biological activity was possible.

The concentrations of glacially transported OC in our samples seem to be lower than for other Holocene samples from GRIP. It is not clear why this is the case, but different locations and therefore other sources, transport routes and deposition processes might be an explanation. Both OC and EC concentrations of the glacially transported material in our samples are slightly lower than concentrations for the Younger and Older Dryas in the nearby Paakitsoq area. This indicates that less organic material settled in the accumulation zone relative to glacial periods. The outcropping material in our samples reveals EC concentrations in the same order of magnitude as generally observed in ice cores from the Holocene age in Greenland. Hence, the dark region seems not to be caused by periods of high EC deposition on the ice sheet, such as by extensive forest fires or anthropogenic emissions, but rather by periods with high mineral dust fluxes. During periods in which higher amounts of eolian mineral dust from the tundra settled on the ice sheet, EC and OC fluxes, even if they are small, can be increased as well. This is confirmed by higher concentrations of carbonaceous particles in ice samples from the dark region relative to reference ice samples. In addition, the age for the outcropping carbon coincides with independent reported values (Reference Eisner, Tornqvist, Koster, Bennike and Van LeeuwenEisner and others, 1995;Reference Willemse, Koster, Hoogakker and Van TatenhoveWillemse and others, 2003) for a likely increased eolian activity in the nearby tundra. This completes the findings of Reference Wientjes, Van de Wal, Reichart, Sluijs and OerlemansWientjes and others (2011), who revealed that surface dust in the dark region consists mainly of minerals and microbes and who presented strong indications that the dust causing the dark region has a local source, based on geochemical analyses.

Measurements of absolute concentrations of outcropping mineral dust in the ice could confirm their higher amounts in the dark region. As we only succeeded in dating one sample with outcropping material, more radiocarbon measurements with larger samples to obtain higher amounts of carbon are required to find out more about the exact period when the dust settled on the ice sheet. Differences in dust fluxes during the Holocene induced by variable local conditions seem to contribute to outcropping dust layers and therefore to albedo variations observed in the ablation zone at present, which affect present-day melt rates.