^{page 89 note 1} A very few illustrations must suffice. ЄΛ(αιος) (p. 63) should be ЄΛ(αία), (p. 65) , (p. 89) , and (p. 90) ; (p. 52) stands for rather than for , (p. 71) for rather than for (p. 62) for rather than for (p. 38) should be (cf. p. 62); (p. 66) appears in Dunaud's publication (Rev. Bibl. 1933, 248 no. 73Google Scholar) as (sic), but the facsimile clearly shows , i.e. ; the reading (BCH XIII. 344Google Scholar) gives rise to the entries (p. 70) and C (p. 100), whereas a glance at the later and better publication of the inscription in question (IG xii(7). 412) shows that we must read , the having been originally omitted and later inserted above the line.

^{page 89 note 2} In a letter to myself.