Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T02:32:52.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The North-West Frontier of Attica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Lilian Chandler
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Of all the states in ancient Greece, Attica seems to have had the most interesting and complete system of land defences. A chain of important fortresses, of most of which there are still considerable remains, follows the line of the Kithairon–Parnes range: Eleutherai, Oinoe, Panakton, Phyle, Dekeleia, Aphidna and Rhamnous. It may appear at first that this series of strongholds was designed expressly to mark off Athenian territory, but whilst incidentally and in large measure they served this end, in origin they were intended rather to defend the various roads from Attica into Boeotia. A fresh examination of these forts and their relation to the Attic frontier may be of some service and interest.

The natural boundary of Attica on the N.W. is the mountain ridge which begins on the Halkyonian sea-coast behind Aigosthena and continues almost due eastward to the Straits of Euboea, reaching the sea at Cape Kalamos. It is not surprising, therefore, to learn that the early tradition made the Megarid and Attica into a single kingdom. Plato, describing an idealised primitive Attica, gives as the boundaries the Isthmus and the heights of Kithairon and Parnes extending down to the sea, with Oropos on the right and the Asopos on the left.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Hellenic Studies , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , 1926 , pp. 1 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Strabo, p. 392.

2 Kritias, 110 D.

3 Iliad, ii. 546.

4 Loc. cit.

5 Cp. the inscription on Hadrian's gate at Athens.

6 P. 395.

7 Wasps, 1223.

8 Hermes, xx. (1886), pp. 91–115.

9 Iliad, ii. 498.

10 ix. 20.

11 Hermes, loc. cit.

12 Sub voc.

13 ii. 23.

14 Bury, , History of Greece, p. 151.Google Scholar

15 Frazer, , note on Pausanias, i. 34, 1.Google Scholar

16 xiv. 17, 3.

17 P. 403.

18 i. 34, 1.

19 Frazer, loc. cit.; Milchhöfer, Karten von Attika, Erläuternder Text.

20 xxxv. 51.

21 iv. 91 et seq.

22 Loc. cit.

23 pro Euxenippo, p. 41.

24 Skala Oropou figured in recent history when the late King Constantine made it his port of embarkation on his way to exile in Switzerland in June 1917.

25 vii. 19.

26 Sub voc.

27 ix. 15.

28 Op. cit.

29 Demi of Attica, p. 123.

30 Apophthegmata, Peisistratos.

31 Diodoros, xiv. 32.

32 Plutarch, , Demetrios, p. 23.Google Scholar

33 See Arch. Anz. 1892, p. 10.

34 Grèce, Guide Joanne, p. 190.

35 Demosth., de Corona, p. 238.

36 Op. cit.

37 P. 404.

38 v. 3, 39–42.

39 Thuc., v. 3, 39.

40 I.G. ii. 1217.

41 Plutarch, , Demetrios, p. 23, 16.Google Scholar

42 Sub voc.

43 Sub voc.

44 De Falsa Leg., p. 446 (326).

45 See below.

46 I.G. ii. 5, 834 b.

47 Plato, , Scholiast ad Symp., p. 208 D.Google Scholar

48 I.G. ii. 5, 614 b.

49 Theb. xii. 619.

50 v. 74.

51 ii. 18.

52 Thuc. viii. 98.

53 i. 38, 8.

54 apud Athenaeum, xi. 486 D.

55 iii. 55.

56 P. 412.

57 Farnell, , Cults of the Greek States, v. p. 116.Google Scholar

58 Apollodoros, III. v. 5.

59 Suppl. p. 757.

60 ix. 1.

61 Eurip. frag. 179 (Nauck).

62 ii. 18; viii. 98.

63 Ap. Strab. p. 393.

64 Diodoros, xiii. 65.

65 Themistocles, 13.

66 Bibliotheca, 534 a, 12 et seq.

67 Sub voc.

68 v. 74.

69 Thuc. i. 103.

70 Thue. iv. 66 et seq.

71 Demosth., de Corona, p. 238.

72 Herod., v. 62; Aristotle, , Ath. Pol. p. 19 (ed. Kenyon, ).Google Scholar

73 Thuc., vii. 19.

74 Philoehoros ap. Strab. p. 397.

75 Note on Pausanias, iii. 8, 6.

76 Karten von Attika, Erl. Text.

77 Athenaion, iii. 1874, p. 126.

78 Leake, Demi, seems to infer this identification.

79 Finlay, G., ‘On the Position of Aphidna,’ in Transactions of the Royal Society of Literature, 1839.Google Scholar

80 Wide, S., Ath. Mitt. xxi. 385.Google Scholar

81 Herod., ix. 73.

82 Demosth., de Corona, p. 238.

83 Arch. Anz. 1892, p. 122.

84 Schneider, G. J. in Berl. Philolog. Wochenschr. 1884, p. 1306.Google Scholar

85 Schneider, loc. cit.

86 Milchhöfer, Karten von Attika, Erl. Text.