Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T12:33:49.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Venus de Milo and the Apollo of Cyrene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Extract

At the recent temporary rearrangement of the sculpture galleries of the British Museum a cast of the Aphrodite was accidentally placed by the side of the large Apollo discovered at Cyrene by the British excavating party. This Apollo has, it appears to me, suffered from an inadequate appreciation of later Greek art, especially of the Eastern schools, and it has been a victim to our poverty in descriptive terms. By this poverty Greek sculptures which are later than what has been supposed a ‘good period’ are all swept up together as ‘Roman’. Roman Art at the simplest is quite the most difficult to determine because so little of it was truly and characteristically Roman. The term is used as of local significance, then in an imperial sense and again of an undefined span of time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1919

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Compare the Venus of Capua which is practically a copy of the Venus de Milo; also the Victory of the Trajan column.

2 Two herms were discovered but a socket in the plinth of the statue shows that only one figure or object was associated with it.

3 See Reinach's Répertoire for other figures.

4 The hair of this Venus de Medici was gilt.