Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T06:31:59.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi decrease Meloidogyne enterolobii infection of Guava seedlings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2020

C.S.B. de Sá Open the ORCID record for C.S.B. de Sá [Opens in a new window]  and
M.A.S. Campos Open the ORCID record for M.A.S. Campos [Opens in a new window]
C.S.B. de Sá
Affiliation:
Collegiate of Biological Sciences, University of Pernambuco Campus Petrolina, BR 203, Km 2, Petrolina, Pernambuco56328-903, Brazil Postgraduate Program in Environmental Science and Technology for the Semiarid, PPGCTAS, University of Pernambuco Campus, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil
M.A.S. Campos*
Affiliation:
Collegiate of Biological Sciences, University of Pernambuco Campus Petrolina, BR 203, Km 2, Petrolina, Pernambuco56328-903, Brazil Postgraduate Program in Environmental Science and Technology for the Semiarid, PPGCTAS, University of Pernambuco Campus, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: M.A.S. Campos, E-mail: maryluce.campos@upe.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Guava (Psidium guajava L.) production is prominent in the irrigated fruit growing area of Brazil. However, the parasite Meloidogyne enterolobii (a phytonematode) has caused a decrease in guava production. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are known to be beneficial to plants; however, their ability to protect plants against nematodes such as M. enterolobii remains poorly known. This study aimed to monitor M. enterolobii infection in guava seedlings inoculated with three AMF species. After AMF inoculation, the seedlings were grown in sterile soil for 60 days before inoculation with 2000 M. enterolobii eggs. Plant growth parameters, mycorrhizal colonization and the number of Meloidogyne in the roots were determined over time (30 and 60 days after Meloidogyne inoculation). The AMF enhanced guava seedling growth, and reduced the amount of Meloidogyne in the roots at 30 and 60 days after nematode inoculation, indicating that these AMF species could serve as biocontrol agents of M. enterolobii in guava cultivation.

Keywords

Irrigated fruit growingSan Francisco Valleyphytonematodearbuscular mycorrhizal fungiplant pathology
Type
Short Communication
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 94 , 2020 , e183
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azcón-Aguilar, C and Barea, JM (1996) Arbuscular mycorrhizas and biological control of soil-borne plant pathogens – an overview of the mechanisms involved. Mycorrhiza 6, 457–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borowicz, V (2001) Do arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter plant-pathogen relations? Ecology 82, 3057–3068.Google Scholar
Byrd, DW Jr and Barker, TK (1983) An improved technique for cleaning and staining plant tissue for detection of nematodes. Journal of Nematology 15, 142–143.Google Scholar
Campos, MAS (2020) Bioprotection by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plants infected with Meloidogyne nematodes: a sustainable alternative. Crop Protection 135, 105203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos, MAS, Silva, FSB, Yano-Melo, AM, Melo, NF, Pedrosa, EMR and Maia, LC (2013) Responses of Guava plants to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil infested with Meloidogyne enterolobii. Plant Pathology Journal 29(3), 242–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campos, MAS, Silva, FSB, Yano-Melo, AM, Melo, NF and Maia, LC (2017) Application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi during the acclimatization of Alpinia purpurata to induce tolerance to Meloidogyne arenaria. Plant Pathology Journal 33(3), 329–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carneiro, RMDG, Moreira, WA, Almeida, MRA and Gomes, ACMM (2001) Primeiro registro de Meloidogyne enterolobii em goiabeiras no Brasil. Nematologia Brasileira 25, 223–228.Google Scholar
Dehne, HW (1982) Interactions between vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and pathogens. Phytopathology 72, 1115–1119.Google Scholar
Ferreira, BS, Santana, MV, Macedo, RS, Silva, JO, Carneiro, MAC and Rocha, MR (2018) Co-occurrence patterns between plant-parasitic nematodes and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are driven by environmental factors. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 265, 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giovannetti, M and Mosse, B (1980) An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytologist 84, 489–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussey, RS and Barker, KR (1973) A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique. Plant Disease Report 57, 1025–1028.Google Scholar
Ingham, RE (1988) Interactions between nematodes and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 24, 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, AR, Javed, N, Javed, N, Sahi, ST, Mukhtar, T, Khan, SA and Ashraf, W (2017) Glomus mosseae (Gerd and Trappe) and Neemex reduce invasion and development of Meloidogyne incognita. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 49(3), 841–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lot, L and Ferraz, JV (2007) Boas perspectivas para fruta de mesa. pp. 314–318in Anuário de Agricultura Brasileira (Agrianual). Brasília, Brazil, Agra FNP, Instituto Ifnp.Google Scholar
Phillips, JM and Hayman, DS (1970) Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 55, 157–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiavo, JA and Martins, MA (2002) Produção de mudas de goiabeira (Psidium guajava L.) inoculadas com fungo micorrízico arbuscular Glomus clarum, em substrato agroindustrial. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 24, 519–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, PS and Sharma, AK (2015) Application of arbuscular mycorrhizal for managing root-knot disease in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) under glass-house conditions in Pantnagar. India. African Journal of Microbiology Research 9(7), 463–468.Google Scholar
Sharma, IP and Sharma, AK (2017a) Physiological and biochemical changes in tomato cultivar PT-3 with dual inoculation of micorrhiza and PGPR against root-knot nematode. Symbiosis 71, 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, IP and Sharma, AK (2017b) Co-inoculation of tomato with na arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus improves plant immunity and reduces root-knot nematode infection. Rhizosphere 4, 25–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddiqui, ZA and Mahmood, I (1998) Effect of plant growth promoting bacterium, an AM fungus and soil types on the morphometrics and reproduction of Meloidogyne javanica on tomato. Applied Soil Ecology 8, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statsoft (1997) Statistica for Windows. Tulsa (CD-ROM).Google Scholar
Suresh, CK, Bagyaraj, DJ and Reddy, DDR (1985) Effect of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza on survival, penetration and development of root-knot nematode in tomato. Plant and Soil 87, 305–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vos, C, Geerinckx, K, Mkandawire, R, Panis, B, De Waele, D and Elsen, A (2012) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi affect both penetration and further life stage development of root-knot nematodes in tomato. Mycorrhiza 22, 157–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vos, C, Schouteden, N, van Tuinen, D, Chatagnier, O, Elsen, A, De Waele, D, Panis, B and Gianinazzi-Pearson, V (2013) Mycorrhiza-induced resistance against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita involves priming of defense gene responses in tomato. Soil Biology Biochemistry 60, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar