Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T23:28:24.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative Studies on the Helminth Fauna of Native and Introduced Domestic Fowls in Ghana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

J. K. M. Hodasi
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana

Extract

1. One hundred and eight native domestic fowls and the same number of introduced birds were killed and examined for helminth parasites between July 1965 and April 1966.

2. Eighteen species of helminths were found in the native birds as opposed to ten in the introduced ones.

3. A detailed comparison of the incidence and intensity of is infection of the different species of parasites in each type of fowl given.

4. The frequency distribution of the number of species of helminths in both types of chickens follows a normal distribution, reflecting the multiple infection in the birds. The frequency distribution of the number of individuals of any one species approximately fits a negative binomial distribution.

5. In general, the native birds were found to be more heavily infected than the introduced ones. This is probably related to differences in host resistance, diet, sanitation and the type of poultry husbandry practised.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bliss, C. I. and Fisher, R. A., 1953.—“Fitting the negative binomial distribution to biological data and note on the efficient fitting of the negative binomial.” Biometrics, 9, 176200.Google Scholar
Fain, A., 1955.—“Sur un nouveau gonglonème, G. congolense n.sp., parasite de la poule, du canard, et des gallinacès sauvages au Congo Belge et au Ruanda-Urundi.” Revue Zool. Bot. afr., 51, 110.Google Scholar
Gedoelst, L., 1916.—“Notes sur la faune parasitaire du Congo Beige.” Revue Zool. Bot. afr., 5, 190.Google Scholar
Gendre, E., 1911.—“Sur quelques espèces d'Hétérakis du Dahomey.” Actes Soc. Linn. Bordeaux, 65, Proc. Verb.é, 6878.Google Scholar
Hodasi, J. K. M., 1967a.—“Digenetic trematodes from the domestic fowl in Ghana.” J. Helminih., 41, 329336.Google Scholar
Hodasi, J. K. M., 1967b.—“On three species of nematodes from chickens at Odorkor state poultry farm, Ghana.” Ghana J. Sci., 7, 130132.Google Scholar
Hudson, J. R., 1934.—“A list of cestodes known to occur in East African mammals, birds and reptiles.” J. E. Afric. Ug. Nat. Hist. Soc. No. 4950: 205217.Google Scholar
James, B. L. and Llewellyn, L. C., 1967.—“A quantitative analysis of helminth infestation in some passerine birds found dead on the Island of Skomer.” J. Helminth., 41, 1944.Google Scholar
Kenya, 1955.—Annual Report, Veterinary Department, 1954, p. 21.Google Scholar
Kenya, Kenya, 1957.—Annual Report, Veterinary Department, 1956, p. 43.Google Scholar
Lapage, G., 1956.—Monnig's Veterinary Helminthology and Entomology. Baillière, Tindall and Cox, London.Google Scholar
Li, S. Y. and Hsü, H. F., 1951.—“On the frequency distribution of parasitic helminths in their naturally infected hosts.” J. Parasit., 37, 3241.Google Scholar
Northam, J. I. and Rocha, U. F., 1958.—“On the statistical analysis of worm counts in chickens.” Expl Parasit., 7, 428438.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., Henry, A. et Sisoff, P., 1912.—“Sur les affinités des dispharages (Acuaria Bremser), nematodes parasites des oiseaux.” C. r. Séanc. Soc. Biol., 73, 622.Google Scholar
Round, M. C., 1962.—“The helminth parasites of domesticated animals in Kenya.” J. Helminth., 36, 375449.Google Scholar
Solomon, S. G., 1932.—“On a collection of parasitic worms from East Africa.” J. Helminth., 10, 209230.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S., 1961.—Systema Helminthum. Vol. III. The Nemalodes of Vertebrates. Interscience Publishers, New York.Google Scholar