Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T19:18:18.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of inoculum age and physical parameters on in vitro culture of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema feltiae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2016

L.G. Leite*
Affiliation:
Instituto Biologico, APTA, CP 70, Campinas, SP 13001-970, Brazil
D.I. Shapiro-Ilan*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, SEFTNRL, Byron, GA 31008, USA
S. Hazir
Affiliation:
Adnan Menderes University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Biology, Aydin-Turkey
M.A. Jackson
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, NCAUR, Peoria, IL, 61604, USA

Abstract

Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) of the families Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae have a symbiotic association with bacteria which makes them virulent against insects. EPNs have been mass produced using in vivo and in vitro methods, including both solid and liquid fermentation. This study assessed the effect of nematode inoculum age on the production of Steinernema feltiae in liquid, solid and biphasic processes. Several physical parameters were also assessed: the effect of medium viscosity, flask size and aeration speed on the recovery and yield of infective juveniles (IJs). Inoculum age treatments included inoculum liquid cultures that were 7, 14, 21 and 28 days old. Nematodes from the same inoculum were added to one liquid medium (liquid culture), one solid medium with bacteria previously grown in sponge (solid culture) and a variation of the solid medium (a biphasic culture), in which the bacteria were first grown in liquid and, then, soaked into the sponges, with the purpose of providing a more homogeneous bacterial culture before nematode inoculation. Experiments were conducted in Erlenmeyer flasks. Eight treatments were established involving combinations of three variables: two media (with and without 0.2% agar), two flask sizes (250 and 150 ml) and two agitation speeds (180 and 280 rpm). The study showed increases in nematode yield for liquid cultures, but not for solid or biphasic cultures, with the advance of the inoculum age up to 28 days of growth. Furthermore, the addition of 0.2% agar to the liquid medium and increasing the aeration rate by using larger flasks with higher agitation speed may increase nematode recovery and final yield. The experiments were conducted using shake flasks but the results may also be applicable for bioreactors.

Type
Research Papers
Creative Commons
This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu Hatab, M. & Gaugler, R. (1999) Lipids of in vivo and in vitro cultured Heterorhabditis bacteriophora . Biological Control 15, 113118.Google Scholar
Bedding, R.A. (1981) Low cost in vitro mass production of Neoaplectana and Heterorhabditis species (Nematoda) for field control of insect pests. Nematologica 27, 109114.Google Scholar
Bedding, R.A. (1984) Large scale production, storage and transport of the insect-parasitic nematodes Neoaplectana spp. and Heterorhabditis spp. Annals of Applied Biology 104, 117120.Google Scholar
Buecher, E.J., Hansen, E.L. & Yarwood, E.A. (1970) Growth of nematodes in defined medium containing hemin and supplemented with commercially available proteins. Nematologica 16, 403409.Google Scholar
Cochran, W.G. & Cox, G.M. (1957) Experimental designs. 2nd edn. New York, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ehlers, R.U. (2001) Mass production of entomopathogenic nematodes for plant protection. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 56, 623633.Google Scholar
Ehlers, R.U. & Shapiro-Ilan, D.I. (2005) Mass production. pp. 6578 in Grewal, P.S., Ehlers, R.U. & Shapiro-Ilan, D.I. (Eds) Nematodes as biocontrol agents. Wallingford, Oxfordshire, CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Ehlers, R.U., Lunau, S., Krasomile-Osterfeld, K. & Osterfeld, K.H. (1998) Liquid culture of the entomopathogenic nematode–bacterium-complex Heterorhabditis megidis/Photorhabdus luminescens . BioControl 43, 7786.Google Scholar
Ehlers, R.U., Niemann, I., Hollmer, S., Strauch, O., Jende, D., Shanmugasundaram, M., Mehta, U.K., Easwaramoorthy, S.K. & Burnell, A. (2000) Mass production potential of the bacto-helminthic biocontrol complex Heterorhabditis indica–Photorhabdus luminescens . Biocontrol Science and Technology 10, 607616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, T., Addison, M.F. & Malan, A.P. (2016) Development and population dynamics of Steinernema yirgalemense (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) and growth characteristics of its associated Xenorhabdus indica symbiont in liquid culture. Journal of Helminthology 90, 364371.Google Scholar
Friedman, M.J. (1990) Commercial production and development. pp. 153172 in Gaugler, R. & Kaya, H.K. (Eds) Entomopathogenic nematodes in biological control. Boca Raton, CRC.Google Scholar
Gaugler, R. (1997) Alternative paradigms for commercializing bio-pesticides. Phytoparasitica 25, 179182.Google Scholar
Gaugler, R. & Han, R. (2002) Production technology. pp. 289310 in Gaugler, E. (Ed.) Entomopathogenic nematology. New York, CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giese, H., Azizan, A., Kümmel, A., Liao, A., Peter, C.P., Fonseca, J.A., Hermann, R., Duarte, T.M. & Büches, J. (2013) Liquid films on shake flask walls explain increasing maximum oxygen transfer capacities with elevating viscosity. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 111, 295308.Google Scholar
Han, R.C. (1996) The effect of inoculum size on yield of Steinernema carpocapsae and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora in liquid culture. Nematologica 42, 546553.Google Scholar
Han, R. & Ehlers, R.-U. (2000) Pathogenicity, development and reproduction of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora and Steinernema carpocapsae under axenic in vivo conditions. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 75, 5558.Google Scholar
Han, R. & Ehlers, R.-U. (2001) Effect of Photorhabdus luminescens phase variants on the in vivo and in vitro development and reproduction of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora and Steinernema carpocapsae . FEMS Microbiology Ecology 35, 239247.Google Scholar
Han, R.C., Cao, L. & Liu, X. (1992) Relationship between medium composition, inoculum size, temperature and culture time in the yields of Steinernema and Heterorhabditis nematodes. Fundamental Applied Nematology 15, 223229.Google Scholar
Han, R.C., Cao, L. & Liu, X. (1993) Effects of inoculum size, temperature and time on in vitro production of Steinernema carpocapsae Agriotos. Nematologica 39, 366375.Google Scholar
Hassane, S.O.S., Farah, A., Satrani, B., Ghanmi, M., Chahmi, N., Chahmi, N., Soidrow, S.H. & Chaouch, A. (2012) Chemical composition and antimicrobial ativity of comorian Ocimum canum essential oil harvested in the region of Maweni Dimani-Grande Comoros. pp. 443452 in Bhowon, M.G., Jhaumeer-Laulloo, S., Wah, H.L.K. & Ramasami, P. (Eds) Chemistry for sustainable development. London, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazir, S., Kaya, H.K., Stock, S.P. & Keskin, N. (2003) Entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae) for biological control of soil pests. Turkish Journal of Biology 27, 181202.Google Scholar
Hieb, W.F. & Rothstein, M. (1968) Sterol requirements for reproduction of a free-living nematode. Science 160, 778779.Google Scholar
Hieb, W.F., Stokstad, E.L.R. & Rothstein, M. (1970) Heme requirement for reproduction of a free-living nematode. Science 168, 143144.Google Scholar
Hirao, A. & Ehlers, R.U. (2010) Influence of inoculum density on population dynamics and dauer juvenile yields in liquid culture of biocontrol nematodes Steinernema carpocapsae and S. feltiae (Nematoda: Rhabditida). Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 85, 507515.Google Scholar
Jeffke, T., Jende, D., Matje, C., Ehlers, R.U. & Berthe-Corti, L. (2000) Growth of Photorhabdus luminescens in batch and glucose fed batch culture. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 54, 326330.Google Scholar
Jess, S., Schweizzer, H. & Kilpatrick, M. (2005) Mushroom applications. pp. 191213 in Grewal, P.S., Ehlers, R.U. & Shapiro-Ilan, D.I. (Eds) Nematodes as biocontrol agents. Wallingford, Oxfordshire, CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Kim, T.W., Kim, T.H., Yasunaga-Aoki, C. & Yu, Y.M. (2014) Mass production of entomopathogenic nematode, Heterorhabditis megidis by using micorosparger of Gandong strain. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University 59, 283288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leite, L.G., Shapiro-Ilan, D.I., Hazir, S. & Jackson, M.A. (2016) The effects of nutrient concentration, addition of thickeners, and agitation speed on liquid fermentation of Steinernema feltiae . Journal of Nematology 48, 126133.Google Scholar
Lewis, E.E. & Clarke, D.J. (2012) Nematode parasites and entomopathogens. pp. 395424 in Vega, F.E. & Kaya, H.K. (Eds) Insect pathology. California, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mascarin, G.M., Jackson, M.A., Kobori, N.N., Behle, R.W., Dunlap, C.A. & Delalibera, I. Jr (2015) Glucose concentration alters dissolved oxygen levels in liquid cultures of Beauveria bassiana and affects formation and bioefficacy of blastospores. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology 99, 66536665.Google Scholar
Neves, J.M., Teixeira, J.A., Simoes, N. & Mota, M. (2001) Effect of air-flow rate on yield of Steinernema carpocapsae Az in liquid culture in an external loop airlift bioreactor. Biotechnology Bioengineering 73, 369373.Google Scholar
Shapiro-Ilan, D. & Gaugler, R. (2002) Production technology for entomopathogenic nematodes and their bacterial symbionts. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology 28, 137146.Google Scholar
Shapiro-Ilan, D., Han, R. & Dolinski, C. (2012) Entomopathogenic nematode production and application technology. Journal of Nematology 44, 206217.Google ScholarPubMed
Shapiro-Ilan, D., Han, R. & Qiu, X. (2014) Production of entomopathogenic nematodes. pp. 321355 in Morales-Ramos, J.A., Rojas, M.G. & Shapiro-Ilan, D.I. (Eds) Mass production of beneficial organisms. Oxford, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Shapiro-Ilan, D.I., Hazir, S. & Glazer, I. (2016) Basic and applied research: entomopathogenic nematodes. pp. 91–105 in Lacey, L.A. (Ed.) Microbial agents for control of insect pests: from discovery to commercial development and use. Amsterdam, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Southwood, T.R.E. (1978) Ecological methods: With particular reference to the study of insect populations. London, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Stock, P. (2015) Diversity, biology and evolutionary relationships. pp. 327 in Campos-Herrera, R. (Ed.) Nematode pathogenesis of insects and other pests. New York, Springer.Google Scholar
Strauch, O. & Ehlers, R. (1998) Food signal production of Photorhabdus luminescens inducing the recovery of entomopathogenic nematodes Heterorhabditis spp. in liquid culture. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 50, 369374.Google Scholar
Strauch, O. & Ehlers, R.U. (2000) Influence of the aeration rate on the yield of the biocontrol nematode Heterorhabditis megidis in liquid culture. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 54, 913.Google Scholar
Tomalak, M., Piggott, S. & Jagdale, G.B. (2005) Glasshouse application. pp. 147166 in Grewal, P.S., Ehlers, R.U. & Shapiro-Ilan, D.I. (Eds) Nematodes as biocontrol agents. Wallingford, Oxfordshire, CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Vanfleteren, J.R. (1974) Nematode growth factor. Nature 248, 255257.Google Scholar
Wang, J.X. & Bedding, R.A. (1998) Population dynamics of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora and Steinernema carpocapsae in vitro solid culture. Fundamental Applied Nematology 21, 165171.Google Scholar
Yoo, S., Brown, I. & Gaugler, R. (2000) Liquid media development for Heterorhabditis bacteriophora: lipid source and concentration. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 54, 759763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoo, S.K., Brown, I., Cohen, N. & Gaugler, R. (2001) Medium concentration influencing growth of the entomopathogenic nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora and its symbiotic bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens . Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 11, 644648.Google Scholar