Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T02:42:09.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experiments with Cysts of the Potato Eelworm (Heterodera schachtii) of Different Ages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Mary T. Franklin
Affiliation:
(Attached to the Institute of Agricultural Parasilology, St. Albans, by the Agricultural Research Council.)

Extract

One of the peculiarities of the eelworm Heterodera schachtii which makes it a very difficult parasite to control is the length of time it can survive in a dormant condition in the soil. In this state the embryonated eggs are protected by the resistant cyst wall, and, in the case of the potato strain of the eelworm, the larvae only hatch in large numbers in the presence of the host plant. On account of this property, land infected with the parasite remains infected even though the host plant is not grown. It is however well known that if “potato sick” land is rested from potatoes for a few years it is then sometimes possible to grow a potato crop giving a fairly good yield and showing little or no sign of sickness in the overground parts. In these cases, however, it is often found that the roots of the plants are heavily infested with eelworm. These and other observations have led to suggestions that other factors may be associated with H. schachtii in giving rise to the condition known as “potato-sickness.” Such factors may be due wholly or in part to soil conditions, climate, fungal attack or the time of attack by the eelworm. In some cases more than one factor may operate in addition to the nematode, and in different cases it is probable that different factors come into play.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carroll, J. & McMahon, E., 1935. —“Potato Eelworm (Heterodera schachtii) Investigations.” J. Helminth., xIII (2), 7790. (W.L. 11224b.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, M. T., 1937.—“The Effect on the Cyst Contents of Heterodera schachtii of the Cultivation of Maize on Potato Sick Land.” J. Helminth., xv (2), 6168. (W.L. 11224b.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, D. F. & Chapman, L. J., 1935.—“Oat seedling diseases in Ontario. I. The oat nematode, Heterodera schachtii, Schra.” Sci. Agric., xv (9), 633651. (W.L. 19968.)Google Scholar
Smedley, E. M., 1936.—“The action of certain halogen compounds on the potato eelworm, Heterodera schachtii.” J. Helminth., xiv (1), 1120. (W.L. 11224b.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triffitt, M. J., 1934.—“Experiments with the root excretions of grasses as a possible means of eliminating Heterodera schachtii from infected soil.” J. Helminth., xii (1), 112. (W.L. 11224b.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar