Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-jhxnr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T06:35:20.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Further Observations on the Morphology of Heterodera schachtii, with Remarks on the Bionomics of a strain attacking Mangolds in Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Marjorie J. Triffitt
Affiliation:
Field Officer, Institute of Agricultural Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Extract

In a previous publication the morphological characters of a strain of H. schachtii specialised on the potato in Lincolnshire were discussed. The size and shape of the brown cysts, size of the eggs and first stage larvæ and the general characters of the adult males of this strain were compared with those of a strain attacking potatoes in Rostock, Mecklenburg, for which the specific name H. rostochiensis was suggested by Wollenweber 1923.

Considerable dimensional variations were found to exist in the Lincolnshire strain, and a study of the literature on the morphological characters of H. schachtii specialised on sugar-beet and oats, showed equally wide divergencies between the findings of different workers. A certain amount of preserved material of infected roots of beet and oats being available to the writer, as many developmental stages as possible were extracted from these, on which similar morphological studies were carried out. Thus a fairly complete comparative survey of H. schachtii specialised on beet, oats and potatoes was completed, and the morphological variations between the strains were found to be insufficient to justify the separation of the strain specialised on potato from those on beet and oats. The name H. rostochicnsis was, therefore, deemed a synonym for H. schachtii.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chatin, J., 1891.—“Recherches sur l'anguillule de la betterave (Helerodera schachtii)”. Bull. Minist. Agric. Paris. Ann. 10, No. 5, pp. 457506. (W.L. 4570.)Google Scholar
Cobb, N. A., 1914.—“Antarctic Marine Free-living Nematodcs of the Shackleton Expedition”. Contr. Sci. Nematology. 1, pp. 133.Google Scholar
Marcinowski, K., 1909.—“Parasitisch und Semiparasitisch an Pflanzen lebende Nematoden”. Arb. biol. Anst. (Abt.) Berl. Bd. 7, Heft 1, p. 149. (W.L. 1628.)Google Scholar
Morgan, D. O., 1925.—“Investigations on Eelworm in Potatoes in South Lincolnshire”. J. Helm. Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 185192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strubell, A., 1888.—“Untersuchungen über den Bau und die Entwicklung des Rübennematoden ‘Heterodera schachtii, Schmidt.‘” Bibl. zool. (Cassel). Heft 2, pp. 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triffitt, M. J., 1928.—“On the Morphology of Heterodera schachtii with Special Reference to the Potato-strain”. J. Helm. Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 3950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voigt, W., 1892.—“Beitrag zur Naturgeschichte des Rüben-, Hafer-, und Erdsen-nematoden (Heterodera schachtii)”. Deuts, landw. Pr. Jahrg. 19, No. 78, pp. 813815. (W.L. 7262.)Google Scholar
Wollenweber, W., 1923.—“Krankheiten und Beschadigungen der Kartoffel”. Arb. Forschlnst. Kartoff. Heft 7, p. 52.Google Scholar