Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-nr6nt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T05:20:22.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On a Collection of Helminths from Dutch Guiana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

R. J. Ortlepp
R. J. Ortlepp
Affiliation:
(Research Assistant in Agricultural Helminthology, London School of Tropical Medicine.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the following report 38 species of helminths from vertebrate hosts are considered, of which three are new. All were collected by Dr. C. Bonné of Surinam, and were presented through Prof. Leiper, F.R.S., to the London School of Tropical Medicine. The writer wishes to express his thanks to Prof. Leiper for the privilege of examining this material.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , February 1924 , pp. 15 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1924

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, F. D., 1911.—“The Trematode Genus Optistorchis, R. Blanchard.” Archiv. d.Paraditologie., v. XIV., pp. 513–561. Paris.Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1920.—“On the Classification of the Ascaridæ. I.—The Systematic Value of certain Characters of the Alimentary Canal.” Parasitology, v. XII., pp. 253–264. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1923.—“On the Nematode Genus Streptopharagus, with some Remarks on the Genus Spirocerca.” Trans. of Roy. Soc. Trop. Med. and Hyg. v. XVI., pp. 486–497. London.Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A. and Daubney, R., 1922.—“Report on the Parasitic Nematodes in the collection of the Zoological Survey of India.” Mem. Ind.Mus., v.VII., pp. 263–347. Calcutta.Google Scholar
Boulenger, C. L., 1921.—“On some Filariid Parasites of Cattle and other Ruminants.” Parasitology., v.XII., pp. 341–349. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bouilliez, M., 1916.—“Sur une Filaire du Crapaud de la région du Chari.” Bull. Soc. Path. Exot., v. IX., pp. 133–137. Paris.Google Scholar
Braun, M., 1901.—“Ein neues Dicrocoelium aus der Gallenblase der Zibethkatze.” Centrbl. f. Bakt. u. Parasitenk., Abt. I, v.XXX., pp. 700–702. Jena.Google Scholar
Cameron, T. W. M., 1923.—“Studies on two new genera and some little known species of the nematode family Trichostrongylide Leiper.” Jl. Helm. V. I., PP. 71–96. London.Google Scholar
Cleave, H. J. van, 1920.—“Two New Genera and Species of acanthocephalous Worms from Venezuelan Fishes.” Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., v. LVIII., pp. 455–466. Washington.Google Scholar
Cohn, L., 1903.—“Helminthologische Mitthilungen.” Arch. f.Natrug., v. LXIX., pp. 47–68. Berlin.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M., 1856.—“Zwanzig Arten von Cephalocotyleen.” Denk. d. math.-naturw. cl. d. k. Akad. d. Wissensch., v.XII., pp. 23–38. Vienna.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M., 1861.—“Revision der Nematoden.” Sitzungsb. d. math.-naturw. cl. d. k. Akad. d. Wissensch., v. XLII., pp. 595–736. Vienna.Google Scholar
Dujarding, M. F., 1845.—“Historie Naturelle des Helminthes ou Vers Intestinauzx.” Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faria, G. DE., 1910.—“Contribution towards the classification of Brazilian Entozoa. III.—Anchlostomum braziliense n. Sp. Parasite of cats and dogs.” Mem. Inst. Osw. Cruz., v. II., pp. 286–292. Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Fischœder, F., 1903.—“Die Paramphistomiden der Säugethiere.” Zool. Jahrb., V. XVII., pp. 485–660. Jena.Google Scholar
Füllerborn, F., 1912.—“Zur Morphologie der Dirofilaria immitis Leydi, 1858.” Centrbl. f. Bakt. u. Parasitenk., Abt. I., v. LXL., pp. 341–349. Jena.Google Scholar
Hall, M. C., 1916.—“Nematode Parasited of Mammals of the Orders Rodentis, Lagomorpha, and Hyracoidea.” Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., v. L., pp. 1–258. WashingtonGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. C., 1919.—“The Adult Cestodes of Dogs and Cats, and of related Carnivores in North America.” Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., v. LV., pp. 1–94. Washington.Google Scholar
Hartmeyer, R., 1909.—“Gordiiæ.” Die S¨sswasserfauna Deutschlands. pt. XV., pp. 86–88. Jena.Google Scholar
Kossack, W., 1910.—“Neue Distomen.” Centrbl. f. Bajt. u. Parasitenk., Abt. I., v. LVI., pp. 114–120. Jena.Google Scholar
Lane, C., 1914.—“Suckered Round-Worms from India and Ceylon.” Ind. Jl. Med. Res., v. II., pp. 655–669. Calcutta.Google Scholar
Lane, C., 1916.—“The Genus Ancylostoma in India and Ceylon.”. Ind. Jl. Med. res., v. IV., pp. 74–92. Calcutta.Google Scholar
Leiper, R. T., 1909.—“Lagochilascaris minor, sp. n.” Abstract No. 74, Proc. Zool. Soc. London.Google Scholar
Leiper, R. T., 1910.—“On a New Nematode Worm from Trinidad.” Proc. Zool. Soc., pp. 742–743. London.Google Scholar
Leiper, R. T., 1913.—“The apparent identity of Agchylostoma ceylanicum Looss, 1911, and Agchylostoma braziliense Faria, 1910.” Jl. Trop. Med. Hyg. London.Google Scholar
Linstow, O von, 1899.—“Nematoden aus der Zoologischen Sammlung.” Mitteil, a. d. Zool. Samml. d. Mus. f. Naturk. inBerlin., v. I., pp. 5–28. Berlin.Google Scholar
Looss, A., 1907.—“Ueber einige zum Teil neue Distomen der europäischen Fauna.” Cnetrbl: f. Bakt. u. Parasitenk., Abt. I., v. XLIII., pp. 604–613. Jena.Google Scholar
Lühe, M., 1895.—“Mitteilungen uber einige wenig bekannte bez. neue sudamerikanische Tænien des k. k. naturhistorischen Hof-Museums in Wien. Arch. f. Naturg., v. LXL., pp. 199–212. Berlin.Google Scholar
Lühe, H., 1910.—“Parasitische Plattwurmer II.” Die s¨sserfauna Deutschlands. v. XVIII., pp. 1–153. Jena.Google Scholar
Maplestone, P. A., 1923.—“A Revision of the Amphistomata of Mammals.” Ann. Trop. Med. and Parasit., v. XVII., pp. 113–205. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Marchi, P., 1871.—“Monografia sulla storia genetica e sulla anotomis della, Spiroptera obtusa Rud.” Mem. r. Acad. d. sc. d. Torino cl. d. sc. fis. e. nat. 2 s, v. XXV., pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
May, H. G., 1919.—“Contributions to the Life Histories of Gordius robustus Leidy and Paragordius varius (Leidy).” Illinois Biol. Monog., v. V., n. 2. Illinois.Google Scholar
Meggitt, F. J., 1920.—“A New Species of Cestode (Oochoristica erinacei) from the Hedgehog.” Parasitology, v. XII., pp. 310–313. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Molin, R., 1857.—“Notizie elmintologiche.” Atti. r. Inst. Veneto. d. sc. lett. e.arti., 3 s., v. II., pp. 146–152, and 216–223. Venice.Google Scholar
Molin, R., 1858.—“Versuch einer Monographie der Filaria.” Sitzungsb. d. k. Akad. d. Wissensch., Wien, math.-naturw. cl., v. XXVIII., pp. 365–461. Vienna.Google Scholar
Ortlepp, R. J., 1922.—“The Nematode Genus Physaloptera Rud.” Proc. Zool. Soc., pp. 999–1107. London.Google Scholar
Ortlepp, R. J., 1923.—“Observations on the Nematode Genera Kalicephalus, Diaphanocephalus, and Occipitodontus g.n., and on the Larval Development of Kalicephalus philodryadus sp. n.” Jl. Helm., v. I., pp. 165–189. London.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., 1916.—“Sur les Filaires des Batraciens.” Bull. Soc. Path. exot., v. IX., pp. 137–140. Paris.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., 1923.—“Les strongyles (anciens Sclerostomes) et les strongyloses proprement dites.” Rec. d. Med. Vet., v. XCIX., pp. 377–396. Paris.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. and Henry, A., 1911.—“Sur une Filaire peritoneale des Porcins.” Bull. Soc. Path. Exot., v. IV., pp. 386–389. Paris.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. and Henry, A., 1911.—“Helminthes du Porc recueillis par M. Bouche en Annam.” Bull. Soc. Path. exot., v. IV., pp. 693–699. Paris.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. and Henry, A., 1914.—“Essai de Classification des Heterakidæ.” IX. Congres internat. de. Zool. tenu aMonaco., pp. 674–682. Rennes.Google Scholar
Schneider, A., 1866.—“Monograhie der Nematoden.,” Berlin.Google Scholar
Seurat, L. G., 1913.—“Sur deux Spiropters du Chat ganté (Felis ocreata).” Compt. rend. Soc. Biol., v. LXXIV., pp. 676–679. Paris.Google Scholar
Seurat, L. G., 1914.—“Sur l'habronema (Spiroptera) leptoptera. (Rud.).” Compt. rend. Soc. Biol., 5. LXXVI., pp. 21–24. Paris.Google Scholar
Seurat, L. G., 1914.—“Sur un nouveau parasite de l'outarde houbara.” Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afr. Nd., 10th yr., pp. 117–119. Algiers.Google Scholar
Seurat, L. G., 1914.—“Sur un Nouveau Spiroptere du Chat Ganeté.” Compt. rend. Soc. Biol., v. LXXIX., pp. 344–347. Paris.Google Scholar
Seurat, L. G., 1916.—“Sur l'Habitat normale et les affinites du Protospirura numidica Seur.” Compt. rend. Soc. Biol., VIII., pp. 143–146. Paris.Google Scholar
Seurat, L. G., 1917.—“Filaires des Reptiles et des Batraciens.”Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afr. Nd., v. VIII., pp. 236–242. Algiers.Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W. and Goldberger, J., 1910.—“A Study of the Anatomy of Watsonius (n.g.) watsoni of Man, Etc.” Hyt. Lab. -Bull., 60. Washington.Google Scholar
Theiler, G., 1923.—“The Stronglylids and other Nematodes parasitc in the Intestinal Tract ofSouth African Equines.” pp. 1–175. Pretoria.Google Scholar
Travassos, L., 1913.—“Sobre as especies brazileiras da subfamilia Heterakinæ Railliet and Henry.” Mem. Inst. Osw. Cruz., v. V., pp. 271–318. Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Travassos, L., 1917.—“Alguns helminthos de collecção do Instituto Bacteiologico de S. Paula.” Braz. Med., 31st yr., pp. 99–100. Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Travassos, L., 1919.—“Revisao dos acantocefalos brazileiros. I.—Fam. Gigantorhynchidæ Hamann, 1892.” Mem. Inst. Osw. Crux., v. IX., pp. 5–62. Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Travassos, L., 1922.—“Cruzia tentaculata (Rud., 1819).” Mem. Inst. Osw. Cruz., v. 9., pp. 5–IX. Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Travassos, L., 1922.—“Cruzia tentaculata (Rud., 1819).” Mem. Inst. Osw. Cruz., v. 14., pp. 66–XIV. Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Veners, G. M., 1923.—“Some new and little known Helminthes from British Guiana.” Jl. Helm., v. I., pp. 35–45. London.Google Scholar
Ware, F., 1923.—“Some members of the family Dicroœlidæ affecting Domestic Animals.” Jl. Comp. Path. adn Therap., v. XXXVI. London.Google Scholar
Zschokke, F., 1905.—“Das Genus Oochoristica Lühe.” Zeitsch. f. wissensch. Zool., v. LXXXIII., pp. 53–67. Leipzig.Google Scholar