Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-9klrw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T05:45:25.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On a New Species of Rhabditis found in an Ice-Chest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

J. J. C. Buckley
J. J. C. Buckley
Affiliation:
(Field Officer, Institute of Agricultural Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In January, 1930, some free-living nematodes belonging to the genus Rhabditis were sent to Professor Leiper by Dr. Broughton-Alcock, who had found them in some fungal slime and débris accumulated in the drip from an ice-chest. Herein they are described as a new species of the genus, being named after the finder, and in view of their somewhat unusual habitat, some observations were made on the temperature reactions of the worms. The medium in which they were found proved unsuitable for the purpose of culturing, and at the suggestion of Professor Leiper a suspension in water of a mixture of powdered charcoal and faæ was used, which has proved very successful. Since January, 1930, pure cultures of the nematodes have been kept in this medium in the Department of Helminthology.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , November 1931 , pp. 197 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clapham, P. A., 1930.—“On Variations in the size of the Nematode Worm Rhabditis succaris n. sp., produced by Different Culture Media,” J. Helm, viii No. 4, pp. 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, N. A., 1924.—“Food of Rhabdites and their relatives, with descriptions of two new Rhabdites, and a new Rhabditoid genus,” J. Parasit, xi pp. 116–117. (W.L. 11428.)Google Scholar
Goodey, T., 1929.—“On some New and little-known free-living Nematodes,” J. Helm., Vol. vii No. 1, pp. 27–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hnatewytsch, N., 1929.—“Die Fauna der Erzgruben von Schneeberg im Erzgebirge,” Zool. Jahrb., lvi, pp. 173–261. (W.L. 23831.)Google Scholar
Kreis, H., 1929.—“Freilebende terrestriche Nematoden aus der Umgebung von Peking,” Zool. Anz., pp. 283–294. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Maupas, E., 1900.—“Modes et formes de Reproduction des Nematodes,” Arch. Zool. exp. gén., 3rd Ser., viii, pp. 463–624. (W.L. 1915.)Google Scholar
Mikoletzky, H., 1921.—“Die freilebenden Erd-Nematoden,” Arch. Naturgesch., Jahrg., 87, Abt. A, heft 8–9., pp. 1–650.Google Scholar
Rahm, G., 1925.—“Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Moostierwelt der preussischen Rheinlande,” Arch. Naturgesch., xc, pp. 153–214.Google Scholar
Rahm, G., 1928.—“Alguns Nematodes parasitas e semi-parasitas das plantas culturaes do Bresil,” Arch. Inst. Biologico Sao Paulo, I, pp. 239–252.Google Scholar
Reiter, M., 1928.—“Zur Systematik und Oekologie der zweigeschlectigen Rhabditiden,” Arb. zool. Inst. Univ. Innsbruck, Bd. III, Heft 4, pp. 1–94.Google Scholar
Schingarewa, A., Demidowa, P. & Kudriawzew, W., 1928.—“Neue Art der beim Menschen entdecken Nematode Rhabditis gracilis,” Old. Sborn. Nausch. Wratsch. Leningrad, pp. 183–196.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., 1923.—“Niederrheinische freilebende Nematoden,” Zool. Anz., LVI, pp. 264–281. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Schneider, W., 1925.—“Freilebende Susswassernematoden aus ostholsteinischen Seen”., Archiv. Hydrobiol. Stuttgart, xv, pp. 536–584.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. I. & Scuhlz, R. E., 1926.—“Eine neue Art Rhabditis aus dem Menschen—Rhabditis schactiella.” Results 25th Helminthol. Exped. to Artemov district, Moscow, pp. 69–72.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. I., Schulz, R. E. & Sserbinoff, P. I., 1926.—“Eine neue Art Rhabditis aus dem Menschen— Rhabditis donbass,” Results 25th Helminthol. Exped. to Artemov district, Moscow, pp. 73–77.Google Scholar
Skwarra, E., 1921.—“Diagnosen neuer freilebender Nematoden Ostpreussens.” Zool. Anz., LIII, pp. 66–74. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Steiner, G., 1926.—“Parasitic Nemas on Peanuts in South Africa,” Zbl. Bakt., Abt. ii, LXVII, pp. 351–365. (W.L. 23684.)Google Scholar
Steiner, G., 1929.—“Rhabditis octopleura n. sp. a new Rhabditis (Rhabditidæ, Nematodes) living in the bark of a diseased elm (Ulmus americanus),” Zool. Anz., LXXX, pp. 146–148. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Watanabe, K., 1922.—“On two cases of Rhabditis infection,” Nihon Shyokakibyo Gakk Zasshi, xxi, No. 2.Google Scholar
Wülker, G., 1921.—“Zur Kenntnis der Nematoden-Gattungen Allantonenia und Bradynema,” Senckenbergiana, Bd. III, Heft 1–2., pp. 1–9. (W.L. 20092.)Google Scholar