Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T21:24:32.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

*On a Remarkable New Cestode, Meggittina baeri gen. et sp. nov. (Anoplocephalinae) from Rodents in Southern Rhodesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Jean A. Lynsdale
Affiliation:
From the Department of Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

Extract

This highly distinctive worm was collected in Honde, Southern Rhodesia, on two separate occasions, from hosts designated “house rat” and “native granary rat” which the writer understands could readily be one and the same, since houses and granaries in these areas are built in fairly close proximity. If, however, it is assumed that these buildings are at a distance from each other, it is possible that two different genera and species are concerned; and if such is the case, the “granary” rat might possibly be a field rat. It is regretted that the identification of the host cannot be more explicit.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baer, J. G., 1927.—“Monographic des cestodes de la familledes Anoplocephalidae.” Bull. biol. France Belg. Suppl., 10, 241 pp. (W.L. 3919.)Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1927.—“The cestode genus Catenotaenia.” Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 9, 19, 433439. (W.L. 1050.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrmann, O., 1932.—“Les ténias des oiseaux.” Mem. Univ. Neuchatel, 8, 381 pp. (W.L. 13345.)Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. and Baer, J. G., 1944.—“Mission biologique Sagan-Omo (Ethiopie méridionale), 1939, dirigée par le Professeur Eduardo Zavattari. Cestodes.” Bull. Soc. neuchatel. Sci. nat., 68, 113140. (W.L. 5299.)Google Scholar
Janicki, C., 1904.—“Zur Kenntnis einiger Saugetiercestoden.” Zool. Anz., 27, 770782. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Janicki, C., 1906.—“Studien an Saugeticrccstoden.” Zeil. wiss. zool., 81, 505597. (W.L. 23635.)Google Scholar
Joyeux, C. E. and Baer, J. G., 1936.—“Faune de France. 30. Cestodes.” Paris. 613 pp.Google Scholar
Joyeux, C. E. and Baer, J. G., 1945.—“Morphologic, évolution et position systématique de Catenotaenia pusilla (Goeze, 1782) cestode parasite de rongeurs.” Rev. suisse Zool., 52, 1351. (W.L. 19288.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyeux, C. E. and Foley, H., 1930.—“Les helninthes de Meriones shawi Rozet dans le nord de l'Algerie.” Bull. Soc. zool., France, 55, 353374 (W.L. 5401.)Google Scholar
Joyeux, C. E., Baer, J. G. and Gaud, J., 1951.—“Recherches helminthologiqucs marocaines. Cestodes (deuxième note).” Arch. Inst. Pasteur Maroc, 4, 93102. (W.L. 1842e.)Google Scholar
Meggitt, F. J., 1924.—“Cestodes of Mammals.” London. 282 pp.Google Scholar
Mcintosh, A., 1941.—“A new dilepidid cestode, Catenotaenia linsdalei, from a pocket gopher in California.” Proc. helm. Soc. Wash., 8, 6062. (W.L. 16747a.)Google Scholar
Wardle, R. and Mcleod, J. A., 1952.—“The Zoology, of Tapeworms.” University of Minnesota Press. Minneapolis. 780 pp.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S., 1942.—“Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Part 42. Cestodes of mammals, II.” Kyoto, Japan. 18 pp.Google Scholar