Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-w588h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-04T09:17:22.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The potential role of habitat on intestinal helminths of mountain hares, Lepus timidus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2024

I.A.R. Hulbert  and
B. Boag
I.A.R. Hulbert*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Aberdeen, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen, AB9 2TN, UK The Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB9 2QJ, UK: Birch Brae, Knapp, Perthshire, PH14 9RN, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: SAC Hill and Mountain Research Centre, Food Systems Division, Kirkton, Crianlarich, West Perthshire, FK20 8RU, UK Fax: 01838 400 248 E-mail: I.Hulbert@au.sac.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over the last century in the uplands of Scotland, the extent of heather moorland which supports high densities of mountain hares Lepus timidus has diminished and has gradually been replaced by large-scale commercial forestry plantations or expanding natural woodlands. The potential impact of such a change in land use on host–parasite interactions was investigated by comparing the intensity and prevalence of infection of hares by parasites in two separate habitats: a large hare-fenced young forestry plantation and the adjacent open moorland. Carcasses were collected in November 1990 from within both habitats and after the woodland had been enclosed for nine months. Age, sex, fatness (kidney fat index) and degree of infection of hares were noted. Two parasites were recorded: the nematode Trichostrongylus retortaeformis and the cestode Mosgovoyia pectinata. Clear differences in the intensity of infection of adults occupying the different habitats had occurred in the nine months since woodland enclosure. Adult mountain hares in the woodland had levels of infections approaching four times that observed in hares occupying the open moorland and although not significant, the prevalence of infection was greater in hosts inhabiting the woodland than the open moorland. It is suggested that the parasite–host relationship differs between the two habitats and as heather-dominated moorland landscapes become more fragmented with the increasing establishment of woodlands, the impact of parasites on the life history strategies of mountain hares needs to be reconsidered.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 75 , Issue 4 , December 2001 , pp. 345 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, P. & Yalden, D.W. (1981) Increased sheep numbers and the loss of heather moorland in the peak district, England. Biological Conservation 20, 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angerbjörn, A. (1981) Winter food as a limiting factor of dense mountain hare populations on islands, a comparative study. pp. 529–535 in Myers, K., MacInnes, C.D. (Eds) Proceedings of the World Lagomorph Conference. University of Guelph.Google Scholar
Boag, B. & Iason, G.R. (1986) The occurrence and abundance of helminth parasites of the mountain hare Lepus timidus (L) and the wild rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus (L.) in Aberdeenshire, Scotland. Journal of Helminthology 60, 92–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boggs, J.F., McMurry, S.T., Leslie, D.M., Engle, D.M. & Lochmiller, R.L. (1978) Influence of habitat modification on the intestinal helminth community ecology of cottontail rabbit populations. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 26, 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broekhuizen, S. & Kemmers, R. (1976) The stomach worm, Graphidium strigosum (Dujardin) Railliet and Henry, in the European hare, Lepus europaeus Pallus. pp. 157–170 in Pielowski, Z., Pucek, Z. The ecology and management of European hare populations. Warsaw, Polish Hunting Association.Google Scholar
Countryside Commission for Scotland and Nature Conservancy Council (1988) National Countryside Monitoring Scheme, Grampian, 39 pp. Countryside Commission for Scotland.Google Scholar
Crofton, H.D. (1948a) The ecology of immature phases of the trichostrongyle nematodes I. The vertical distribution of infective larvae of Trichostrongylus retortaeformis in relation to their habitat. Parasitology 39, 17–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crofton, H.D. 1948b The ecology of immature phases of the trichostrongyle nematodes II. The effect of climatic factors on the availability of the infective larvae of Trichostrongylus retortaeformis to the host. Parasitology 39, 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Custer, J.W. & Pence, D.B. (1981) Helminths of wild canids from the Gulf coastal prairies of Texas and Louisiana. Journal of Parasitology 67, 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flux, J.E.C. (1970) Life history of the mountain hare (Lepus timidus scoticus) in north-east Scotland. Journal of Zoology 161, 75–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genstat 5 Committee (1993) Genstat 5 reference manual. 796 pp. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hulbert, I.A.R. Iason, G.R. (1996) The possible effects of landscape change on diet composition and body weight of mountain hares Lepus timidus. Wildlife Biology 2, 269–273.10.2981/wlb.1996.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulbert, I.A.R., Iason, G.R. & Racey, P.A. 1996a Habitat utilisation in a stratified landscape of two lagomorphs with different feeding strategies. Journal of Applied Ecology 33, 315–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulbert, I.A.R., Iason, G.R., Elston, D.A. & Racey, P.A. 1996b Home-range sizes in a stratified landscape of two lagomorphs with different feeding strategies. Journal of Applied Ecology 33, 1479–1488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iason, G.R. & Boag, B. (1988) Do intestinal helminths affect condition and fecundity of adult mountain hares. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 24, 599–605.Google ScholarPubMed
Jacobson, H.A., Kirkpatrick, R.L. & McGinnes, B.S. (1978) Disease and physiologic characteristics of two cottontail populations in Virginia. Wildlife Monographs pp. 60.53 The Wildlife Society.Google Scholar
Jones, H.G. (1983) Plants and microclimate: a quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology 323 pp. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keith, L.B., Cary, J.R., Yuill, T.M. & Keith, I.M. (1985) Prevalence of helminths in a cyclic snowshoe hare population. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 21, 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, L., Esch, G.W., Holmes, J.C., Kuris, A.M. & Schad, G.A. (1982) The use of ecological terms in parasitology. Journal of Parasitology 68, 131–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, D. (1959) The effects of temperature and humidity on the free-living stages of Trichostrongylus retortaeformis . Canadian Journal of Zoology 37, 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D.L. (1987) Estimation and use of variance components. The Statistician 36, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S. & Castellan, N.J. (1988) Non-parametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. 399 pp. New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G.W. & Cochran, W.G. (1980) Statistical methods 593 pp. Iowa, Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Sykes, J.M., Lowe, V.P.W., Briggs, D.R. (1989) Some effects of afforestation on the flora and fauna of an upland sheep walk during 12 years after planting. Journal of Applied Ecology 26, 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teel, P.D., Marin, W.E. & Grant, W.E. (1996) Simulation of host–parasite–landscape interactions: influence of season and habitat on cattle fever tick (Boophilus sp.) population dynamics. Ecological Modelling 84, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usher, M.J.B. & Thompson, D.B.A. (Eds) (1988) Ecological change in the uplands. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Van der Merwe, M., Racey, P.A. (1991) Body composition and reproduction in mountain hares (Lepus timidus scoticus) in north-east Scotland. Journal of Zoology 225, 676–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar