Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-15T02:26:41.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recovery of adult stages and microfilaraemia after low dose inoculation of third stage larvae of Litomosoides carinii in Sigmodon hispidus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Peter Wenk
Affiliation:
Institute of Tropical Medicine, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany
Jürgen Mössinger
Affiliation:
Institute of Tropical Medicine, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany

Abstract

Because of the negative binomial distribution of filarial third stage larvae (L3) in their vectors, under natural conditions only a few are usually transferred per bite. After an inoculation of 5 L3 per animal into eight host animals at least one developed a long lasting patency based on one reproductive female only. After an inoculation of 15 L3, three of eight animals developed long lasting patency, harbouring between two and five fertile females. The rates of adult stages recovered were 0·43 and 0·30 respectively. The parasitaemias of the six patent animals in both experimental groups increased with the number of reproductive females present (r=0·89, p=<0·005). All non-patent animals which were mf-negative in the pleural fluid and lung blood as well had a single sex or no worm load. In only one animal was there an apparently normal but non-reproductive pair of worms without any pathological alterations of the host animal. Encapsulated adult worms were found rarely, but independent of the final worm load or inoculation dose and always beside normal adults. In three of the 16 animals inoculated with 5 or 15 L3 patency passed after 10–12 weeks p.i., in two others it seemed to pass soon. After inoculation of 30, 40 or 60 L3 per animal patency passed early in about one half of 105 animals, when they were observed up to 24–36 weeks p.i. In conclusion all types of host defensive reactions are already visible after inoculation with such small doses. Nevertheless even a single inoculation of 5 L3 may give rise to a patent animal and its microfilaraemia is sufficient for transmission under natural conditions. Higher inoculation doses increase the defensive reactions which nevertheless remain unable to destroy all invasive stages.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anuar, A. K., Katz, S. P. & Orihel, T. C. (1982) Influence of different inocula of Dipetalonema viteae on the development of infection in the jird Meriones unguiculatus. Proceedings 25 Seameo- Tropmed. Seminar, 5564.Google Scholar
Barthold, E. & Wenk, P. (1986) Quantitative relations in the extrinsic development of Dipetalonema viteae (Nematoda, Filarioidea) in the vector tick Ornithodorus moubata. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Zoologie, 73, 4962.Google Scholar
Barthold, E. & Wenk, P. (1990) Influence of the inoculation dose on the recovery rate of Acanthocheilonema viteae after single and repeated inoculations in Meriones unguiculatus. 14th Meeting of the German Society for Parasitology, Marburg, 199O.Google Scholar
Bayer, M. & Wenk, P. (1988) Homologous and crossreacting immune response of the jird and Cotton rat against microfilariae of Dipetalonema viteae and Litomosoides carinii (Nematoda: Filarioidea). Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 39, 304308.Google Scholar
Bleiholder, B. (1983) Aufnahme und Entwicklung von Mikrofilarien (Litomosoides carinii, Nematoda, Filarioidea) bei Fütterung des Überträgers am natürlichen Wirt und in vitro. Thesis for Diploma in Biology, Tuebingen, FRG.Google Scholar
Hoffmeister, K. (1990) Invasion dynamics and early immune response of migrating larvae of Litomosoides carinii in Sigmodon hispidus. Thesis for Diploma in Biology. Erlangen, FRG.Google Scholar
Jaquet, C. (1980) Litomosoides carinii (Travassos. 1919). Chandler. 1913 (Filarioidea) in Cotton Rats (Sigmodon hispidus, Say et Ord. 1825) and Jirds (Meriones unguiculatus, Mime-Edwards, 1867). Comparison of the Infection in Relation to the Immune Response. Thesis PhD, Neuchatel, CH. 113 pgs, 16 figs.Google Scholar
Mössinger, J. & Wenk, P. (1986) Fecundity of Litomosoides carinii (Nematoda. Filarioidea) in vivo and in vitro. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde, 72, 121131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nilsberg, A. & Wenk, P. (1988) Extrinsische Entwicklung und Infektiosität der metazyklischen Larven von Litomosoides carinii (Nematoda: Filarioidea) in Sigmodon hispidus. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Zoololgie, 75 429439.Google Scholar
Petrany, G. & Mieth, H. (1972) Eine rationelle Methode zur quantitativen Infektion adäquater Labortiere mit Litomosides carinii. Zeitschrift für Tropenmedizin und Parasitologie, 23, 29.Google Scholar
Renz, A., Bleiholder, B. & Wenk, P. (1983) Fitting the negative binomial distribution to the frequency distributions of infective larvae of Litomosoides carinii and Onchocerca volvulus (Nematoda: Filarioidea) in their vectors Ornithonyssus bacoti (Acari: Gamasina) and Simulium damnosum s. I. (Diptera: Nematocera). Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie und Hygiene, A 256, 270.Google Scholar
Sachs, L. (1972) Statistische Auswertungsmethoden. Springer Berlin. 545 pp.Google Scholar
Wenk, P. (1986) The function of non circulating microfilariae: Litomosoides carinii (Nematoda: Filariodea). Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift, 93, 414418.Google Scholar
Wenk, P. & Wegerhof, P-H. (1982) Studies on acquired resistance of the cotton rat against microfilariae of Litomosoides carinii. 2. Injection of microfilariae during prepatency. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde, 68, 321329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, M. M. (1964) Studies on microfilaraemia in dogs. I. A search for mechanisms that stabilize the level of microfilaraemia. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 13, 5765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar