Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T19:23:00.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Kidney-Flukes from Sudanese Birds, with a Description of a New Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

C. A. Wright
C. A. Wright
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, British Museum (Natural History)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Ignavia venusta de Freitas is recorded from the kidneys of two Fish-eagles (Cuncuma vocifer) and a Goliath heron (Ardea goliath) from the Southern Sudan.

2. Ignavia is regarded as a valid genus and to it is transferred Allechinostomum renale Yeh, 1954.

3. Ignavia inops de Freitas (= Echinostomum sp.inq. Dietz, 1910) probably does not belong to the genus Ignavia or even to the subfamily Echinochasminae.

4. A new species of Renicola is described from the kidney of the Goliath heron and is named R. goliath.

5. The affinities of R. goliath are discussed and R. brantae McIntosh and Farr, 1952 is figured.

6. The significance of the occurrence of these two flukes in the Southern Sudan is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , December 1957 , pp. 229 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dietz, E., 1910.—“Die Echinostomiden der Vogel.” Zool. Jahrb. Supp., 12, 265–512. (W.L. 23835).Google Scholar
Freitas, J. F. Teixeira De, 1948.—“Echinostomatidae parasito de uréter de Ave (Trematoda)”. Rev. Bras. Biol., 8, 489–492. (W.L. 18800d).Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. and Farr, M. M., 1952.—“Renicola brantae n.sp. from the kidney of the Canada Goose Branta canadensis”. J. Parasitol., 38, 35–36.Google Scholar
Odhner, T., 1902. —“Trematoden aus reptilien. ” Ofvers. Vetensk. Akad. Förh., Stockh. 1902 No. 1. Stockholm, 19–46. (W.L. 15615).Google Scholar
Odhner, T., 1910.—“Nordostafrikanische Trematoden, grossenteils vom Weissen Nil (von der schwedischen zoologischen Expedition gessamelt).” Results Swedish Zool. Exped. Egypt and White Nile 1901, No. 23A, 1–170.Google Scholar
Price, E. W., 1931.—“Four new species of trematode worms from the Muskrat, Ondatra zibethica, with a key to the trematode parasites of the Muskrat.” Proc. U.S. nat. Mus., 79, 1–13. (W.L. 16944).Google Scholar
Prudhoe, S., 1944.—“On some Trematodes from Ceylon.” Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. Ser. 11, 1–13. (W.L. 1050).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prudhoe, S., 1951.—“Trematoda, Cestoda and Acanthocephala.” Exploration Hydrobiologique du Lac Tanganyika. (1946–1947). Resultats Scientifiques 3 (2), 1–10.Google Scholar
Wright, C. A., 1954.—“Trematodes of the genus Renicola from birds in British zoos, with descriptions of two new species.” Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., 124, 51–61. (W.L. 16969B).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. A., 1956.—“Studies on the life-history and ecology of the trematode genus Renicola Cohn, 1904.” idem, 126, 1–49.Google Scholar
Yeh, L. S., 1954.—“On a new trematode Allechinostomum renale sp.nov. (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae), from Pelecanus erythrorhynchos.” J. Helminth, 28, 159–164. (W.L. 1122C).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed