Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T12:43:34.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two new species of Enenterum Linton, 1910 (Digenea) in the marine fish Neoscorpis lithophilus (Kyphosidae) from the south-western Indian Ocean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

R. A. Bray
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD

Abstract

Enenterum elsti sp. nov. and E. prudhoei sp. nov. are described from the intestine of Neoscorpis lithophilus off Mapelane, Natal, South Africa. These species differ from others of the genus Enenterum in the ratio of the oral sucker to body-length and in the length of the prepharynx. E. elsti differs from. E. prudhoei in size, in sucker-ratio and in the number and configuration of the oral lobes. A key to the species of Enenterum is presented and the status of the genus briefly discussed.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dollfus, R. P. (1946) Sur trois espéces de distomes, dont une a 17 ventouses (Enenterum (Jeancadenatia) brumpti n. sp.) parasites du poisson marin Kyphosus sectatrix (L.). Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée, 21, 119128.Google Scholar
Fischthal, J. H. and Thomas, J. D. (1972) Digenetic trematodes of marine fishes from Senegal. Bulletin de l’Institute Fondamental d’ Afrique Noire, Ser. A. Sci. nat., 34, 292322.Google Scholar
Gibson, D. I. (1976) Monogenea and Digenea from fishes. Discovery Reports, 36, 179266.Google Scholar
Gomes, D. C., Fabio, S. P. de and Rolas, F. J. T.-S. (1974) Contribução para o conhecimento dos parasitos de peixes do litoral do Estado da Guanabara. – Parte II. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 72, 919.Google Scholar
Greenwood, P. H., Rosen, D. E., Weitzman, S. H. and Myers, G. S. (1966) Phyletic studies of teleostean fishes, with a provisional classification of living forms. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 131, 339456.Google Scholar
Hafeezullah, M. (1977) Two digenetic trematodes of a marine fish, Kyphosus cinerascens (Forskal), from the Gulf of Manaar with a note on the systematic positions of the genera Enenterum Linton, 1910, Cadenatella Dollfus, 1946 and Jeancadenatia Dollfus, 1946. Abstracts of the 1st National Congress of Parasitology, India (Baroda, 24–26, 02., 1977), 22.Google Scholar
Hopkins, S. H. (1934) The papillose Allocreadiidae. Illinois Biological Monographs, 13, 180.Google Scholar
Ichihara, A. (1969) Enenterum spp. of rudder fish, Kyphosus lembus, from Katsuura, Pacific coast, Japan (In Japanese). Japanese Journal of Parasitology, 18, 664665.Google Scholar
Linton, E. (1910) Helminth fauna of the Dry Tortugas. II. Trematodes. Papers from the Tortugas Laboratory of the Carnegie Institute of Washington, 4, 1198.Google Scholar
Manter, H. W. (1947) The digenetic trematodes of marine fishes of Tortugas, Florida. The American Midland Naturalist, 38, 257416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manter, H. W. (1949) An additional trematode from Tortugas, Florida, and a new name for Opisthoporus Manter, 1947, preoccupied. The American Midland Naturalist, 41, 432435.Google Scholar
Nagaty, H. F. (1942) Trematodes of fishes from the Red Sea. Part 3 – On seven new allocreadiid species. Publications of the Marine Biological Station, Ghardaqa (Red Sea), 4, 127.Google Scholar
Nagaty, H. F. (1948) Trematodes of fishes from the Red Sea. Part 4 – On some new and known forms with a single testis. The Journal of Parasitology, 34, 355363.Google Scholar
Nahhas, F. M. (1964) Digenetic trematodes from marine fishes of Curaçao and Jamaica. Dissertation Abstracts, 24, 56265627.Google Scholar
Nahhas, F. M. and Cable, R. M. (1964) Digenetic and aspidogastrid trematodes from marine fishes of Curação and Jamaica. Tulane Studies in Zoology, 11, 167228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overstreet, R. M. (1969) Digenetic trematodes of marine teleost fishes from Biscayne Bay, Florida. Tulane Studies in Zoology and Botany, 15, 119176.Google Scholar
Poche, F. (1926) Das System der Platodaria. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, Abteilung A, 91, 1459.Google Scholar
Schell, S. C. (1970) How to know the trematodes. Wm. C. Brown Co.: Dubuque, 355 pp.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. I. and Koval, V. P. (1966a) Superfamily Allocreadioidea Nicoll, 1934. In Skrjabin, K. I. (ed) Trematodes of animals and man. Principles of trematodology (In Russian). Moscow, 22, 177182.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. I. and Koval, V. P. (1966b) Family Enenteridae Skrjabin et Koval, 1965. In Skrjabin, K. I. (ed) Tremateodes of animals and man. Principles of trematodology (In Russian). Moscow, 22, 479506.Google Scholar
Smith, M. M. (1975) Common and Scientific names of the fishes of Southern Africa. Part 1. Marine fishes. The J. L. B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Special Publication No. 14, 178 pp.Google Scholar
Sogandares-Bernal, F. (1959) Digenetic trematodes of marine fishes from the Gulf of Panama and Bimini, British West Indies. Tulane Studies in Zoology, 7, 69117.Google Scholar
Winter, H. A. (1957) Trematodes de peces marinos de aguas mexicanas. XII. Dos generos de digeneos (Lepocreadiidae), incluyendo una nueva especie procedente de Kyphosus elegans (Peters) de las Islas Tres Marias, en el Oceano Pacifico. Anales del Instituto de Biologia, Universidad de México, 27, 403413.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1953) Systema helminthum. Part 1. Digenetic trematodes of fishes. Published by the author: Tokyo, 405 pp.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1958) Systema helminthum. Vol. 1. The digenetic trematodes of vertebrates. Interscience Publications, New York, 1575 pp.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1970) The digenetic trematodes of Hawaiian fishes. Keigaku Publishing Co.; Tokyo, 436 pp.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1971) Synopsis of digenetic trematodes of vertebrates. Keigaku Publishing Co.; Tokyo, Vol. I, 1074 pp., Vol. II, 349 plates.Google Scholar